Rating procedures were replicated and extended to screen instructional improvement proposals based on four criteria: learning relevance, innovation, feasibility, and potential for continuation. A composite total score correlated .77 with project funding. Quantitative approach complements collegial decision making.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EbleK. E., & McKeachieW. J.Improving undergraduate education through faculty development.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1985.
2.
KozmaR. B.Faculty development and the adoption and diffusion of classroom innovations.Journal of Higher Education, 1978, 49, 438–449.
