Inventories of Human Lateral Preference: A Systematic Review

Abstract

There are a variety of inventories available to evaluate human lateral preference, but no previous review has systematically analyzed and compared them. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify these inventories and describe their characteristics (e.g., dimensions, scales, tasks, psychometric properties). We included 26 articles, each presenting a different inventory to assess lateral preference, published between 1900 and 2022, selected from the following databases: PubMed, SportDiscus, APA PsycNET, and Web of Science. These inventories analyzed tasks performed in everyday life (domestic, work-related, sports, and leisure/recreation activities), covering hand, foot, hearing, visual and other non-usual lateral preference dimensions, such as trunk and head. Most inventories classified individuals based on the direction (left, indifferent or right preference) and degree (consistent or moderate) of laterality. However, many of the reviewed inventories lack established psychometric verification in their original publication, such as validity, reliability, responsiveness, and practical applicability. Inventories also presented tasks that may be specific to a given cultural setting, limiting their application across different countries. Based on these findings, we provide a comprehensive guide for researchers to select a lateral preference assessment tool, but also advocate for a new inventory with a broader approach, containing more than one dimension of lateral preference (i.e., not only handedness) and tasks that are common to different cultures to enhance practical applicability worldwide.

Keywords

functional laterality handedness footedness evaluation instruments psychometric properties

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Annett

(1970). A classification of hand preference by association analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 61(3), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2044-8295.1970.TB01248.X

Annett

(1972). The distribution of manual asymmetry. British Journal of Psychology, 63(3), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2044-8295.1972.TB01282.X

Annett

(2004). Hand preference observed in large healthy samples: Classification, norms and interpretations of increased non-right-handedness by the right shift theory. British Journal of Psychology, 95(Pt 3), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126041528130

Bazo

N. S.

Marcori

A. J.

Monteiro

P. H. M.

Okazaki

V. H. A.

(2022). Cultural and environmental aspects influence lateral preferences. International Journal of Psychology: Journal International de Psychologie, 57(6), 753–759. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12863

Beukelaar

L. J.

Kroonenberg

P. M.

(1983). Towards a conceptualization of hand preference. British Journal of Psychology, 74(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2044-8295.1983.TB01841.X

Bryden

P. J.

(2016). The influence of M. P. Bryden’s work on lateralization of motor skill: Is the preferred hand selected for and better at tasks requiring a high degree of skill? Laterality, 21(4–6), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2015.1099661

Cano

S. J.

Hobart

J. C.

(2011). The problem with health measurement. Patient Preference and Adherence, 5, 279–290. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S14399

Chapman

J. P.

Chapman

L. J.

Allen

J. J.

(1987). The measurement of foot preference. Neuropsychologia, 25(3), 579–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(87)90082-0

Chapman

L. J.

Chapman

J. P.

(1987). The measurement of handedness. Brain and Cognition, 6(2), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(87)90118-7

10.

Cook

D. A.

Beckman

T. J.

(2006). Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. The American Journal of Medicine, 119(2), 166.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMJMED.2005.10.036

11.

Coren

(1993). The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness: Norms for young adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334122

12.

Coren

Porac

Duncan

(1979). A behaviorally validated self-report inventory to assess four types of lateral preference. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688637908401098

13.

Crovitz

H. F.

Zener

(1962). A group-test for assessing hand- and eye-dominance. American Journal of Psychology, 75(2), 271–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1419611

14.

Curt

Mesbah

Lellouch

Dellatolas

(1997). Handedness scale: How many and which items? Laterality, 2(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/713754262

15.

de Agostini

Khamis

A. H.

Ahui

A. M.

Dellatolas

(1997). Environmental influences in hand preference: An African point of view. Brain and Cognition, 35(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1006/BRCG.1997.0935

16.

Domellöf

Johansson

A. M.

Rönnqvist

(2011). Handedness in preterm born children: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2299–2310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.033

17.

Downs

S. H.

Black

(1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52(6), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1136/JECH.52.6.377

18.

Doyen

A. L.

Duquenne

Nuques

Carlier

(2001). What can be learned from a lattice analysis of a laterality questionnaire? Behavior Genetics, 31(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010205528113

19.

Elias

L. J.

Bryden

M. P.

(1998). Footedness is a better predictor of language lateralization than handedness. Laterality, 3(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/713754287

20.

Fazio

Dunham

K. J.

Griswold

Denney

R. L.

(2013). An improved measure of handedness: The Fazio laterality inventory. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 20(3), 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/09084282.2012.684115

21.

Forrester

(2017). Hand, limb, and other motor preferences. In Rogers

Vallortigara

(Eds.), Lateralized brain function: Methods in human and non-human species (pp. 121–152). Human Press.

22.

Healey

J. M.

Liederman

Geschwind

(1986). Handedness is not a unidimensional trait. Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 22(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(86)80031-4

23.

Hoffmann

Latza

Baumeister

S. E.

Brünger

Buttmann-Schweiger

Hardt

Hoffmann

Karch

Richter

Schmidt

C. O.

Schmidtmann

Swart

van den Berg

(2019). Guidelines and recommendations for ensuring good epidemiological practice (GEP): A guideline developed by the German society for epidemiology. European Journal of Epidemiology, 34(3), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00500-x

24.

Hopkins

W. D.

(2006). Comparative and familial analysis of handedness in great apes. Psychological Bulletin, 132(4), 538–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.4.538

25.

Hopkins

W. D.

(2013). Comparing human and nonhuman primate handedness: Challenges and a modest proposal for consensus. Developmental Psychobiology, 55(6), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/DEV.21139

26.

Hull

C. J.

(1936). A study of laterality test items. The Journal of Experimental Education, 4(3), 287–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1936.11010014

27.

Humphrey

M. E.

(1951). Consistency of hand usage: A preliminary enquiry. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 21(3), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2044-8279.1951.TB02790.X

28.

Ittyerah

(2019). Hand and foot preference in two cultures. Laterality, 24(6), 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2019.1575389

29.

Kashihara

(1979). Lateral preference and style of cognition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48(3 Pt 2), 1167–1172. https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.1979.48.3C.1167

30.

Kawakami

Hatta

Ito

(2004). Handedness and footedness in members of general Japanese population. Journal of Human Environmental Studies, 2(2), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.4189/shes.2.2_51

31.

Kushner

H. I.

(2013). Why are there (almost) no left-handers in China? Endeavour, 37(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2012.12.003

32.

Landis

Koch

(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

33.

Mandal

M. K.

Pandey

Singh

S. K.

Asthana

H. S.

(1992). Degree of asymmetry in lateral preferences: Eye, foot, ear. The Journal of psychology, 126(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1992.10543350

34.

Marcori

Grosso

Porto

A. B.

Okazaki

V. H. A.

Okazaki

V. H. A.

(2019a). Beyond handedness: Assessing younger adults and older people lateral preference in six laterality dimensions. Laterality, 24(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2018.1495725

35.

Marcori

Monteiro

P. H. M.

Okazaki

V. H. A.

(2019b). Changing handedness: What can we learn from preference shift studies? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 107(December), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.019

36.

Marcori

Okazaki

(2020). A historical, systematic review of handedness origins. Laterality, 25(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2019.1614597

37.

Marcori

Teixeira

L. A.

Dascal

J. B.

Okazaki

V. H. A.

(2020a). Are the predictions of the dynamic dominance model of laterality applicable to children? Developmental Neuropsychology, 45(7–8), 496–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2020.1849220

38.

Marcori

A. J.

Teixeira

L. A.

Dascal

J. B.

Okazaki

V. H. A.

(2020b). Are the predictions of the dynamic dominance model of laterality applicable to the lower limbs? Human Movement Science, 73(May), 102684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2020.102684

39.

Marim

Lafasse

Okazaki

V. H. A.

(2011). Inventário de preferência lateral global (IPLAG). Brazilian Journal of Motor Behavior, 6(3), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v6i3.57

40.

Marshall

J. C.

Caplan

Holmes

J. M.

(1975). The measure of laterality. Neuropsychologia, 13(3), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(75)90008-1

41.

Martin

W. L. B.

Machado

A. H.

(2005). Deriving estimates of contralateral footedness from prevalence rates in samples of Brazilian and non-Brazilian right- and left-handers. Laterality, 10(4), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500442000148

42.

Meguerditchian

Calcutt

S. E.

Lonsdorf

E. V.

Ross

S. R.

Hopkins

W. D.

(2009). Brief communication: Captive gorillas are right-handed for bimanual feeding. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 141(4), 638–645. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21244

43.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

Altman

D. G.

PRISMA Group . (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

44.

Nicholls

M. E. R.

Thomas

N. A.

Loetscher

Grimshaw

G. M.

(2013). The flinders handedness survey (FLANDERS): A brief measure of skilled hand preference. Cortex; A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 49(10), 2914–2926. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CORTEX.2013.02.002

45.

Nurhayu

Nila

Raymond

Suryobroto

(2017). Are right- and left-handedness relevant as general categories in a non-industrialized country? Acta Ethologica, 21(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10211-017-0279-Y

46.

Oldfield

R. C.

(1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4

47.

Oliveira

Moura

T. B. M. A.

Rodacki

A. L. F.

Tilp

Okazaki

V. H. A.

(2020). A systematic review of volleyball spike kinematics: Implications for practice and research. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 15(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954119899881

48.

Ouzzani

Hammady

Fedorowicz

Elmagarmid

(2016). Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13643-016-0384-4

49.

Packheiser

Schmitz

Berretz

Carey

D. P.

Paracchini

Papadatou-Pastou

Ocklenburg

(2020). Four meta-analyses across 164 studies on atypical footedness prevalence and its relation to handedness. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 14501. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71478-w

50.

Page

M. J.

Moher

Bossuyt

P. M.

Boutron

Hoffmann

T. C.

Mulrow

C. D.

Shamseer

Tetzlaff

J. M.

Akl

E. A.

Brennan

S. E.

Chou

Glanville

Grimshaw

J. M.

Hróbjartsson

Lalu

M. M.

Loder

E. W.

Mayo-Wilson

Mcdonald

Mckenzie

J. E.

(2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(n160). https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.N160

51.

Palmer

R. D.

(1964). Development of a differentiated handedness. Psychological Bulletin, 62(4), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046588

52.

Papadatou-Pastou

Ntolka

Schmitz

Martin

Munafò

M. R.

Ocklenburg

Paracchini

(2020). Human handedness: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(6), 481–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000229

53.

Peters

(1998). Description and validation of a flexible and broadly usable handedness questionnaire. Laterality, 3(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/713754291

54.

Polit

D. F.

(2015). Assessing measurement in health: Beyond reliability and validity. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(11), 1746–1753. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJNURSTU.2015.07.002

55.

Porac

Coren

(1979). Individual and familial patterns in four dimensions of lateral preference. Neuropsychologia, 17(5), 543–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(79)90064-2

56.

Prieur

Barbu

Blois-Heulin

(2017). Assessment and analysis of human laterality for manipulation and communication using the Rennes Laterality Questionnaire. Royal Society Open Science, 4(8), 170035. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170035

57.

Provins

K. A.

Cunliffe

(1972). The reliability of some motor performance tests of handedness. Neuropsychologia, 10(2), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(72)90060-7

58.

Raczkowski

Kalat

J. W.

Nebes

(1974). Reliability and validity of some handedness questionnaire items. Neuropsychologia, 12(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(74)90025-6

59.

Raymond

Pontier

(2004). Is there geographical variation in human handedness? Laterality, 9(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500244000274

60.

Roach

(2006). Measurement of health outcomes: Reliability, validity and responsiveness. JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, 18(Proceedings), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008526-200601001-00003

61.

Roberts

Priest

(2006). Reliability and validity in research. Nursing Standard: 1987), 20(44), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.7748/NS2006.07.20.44.41.C6560

62.

Sainburg

R. L.

(2014). Convergent models of handedness and brain lateralization. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(SEP), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01092

63.

Searleman

Porac

(2001). Lateral preference patterns as possible correlates of successfully switched left hand writing: Data and a theory. Laterality, 6(4), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/713754420

64.

Steenhuis

R. E.

Bryden

M. P.

(1989). Different dimensions of hand preference that relate to skilled and unskilled activities. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 25(2), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-9452(89)80044-9

65.

Steenhuis

R. E.

Bryden

M. P.

(1999). The relation between hand preference and hand performance: What you get depends on what you measure. Laterality, 4(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/713754324

66.

Teixeira

L. A.

(2008). Categories of manual asymmetry and their variation with advancing age. Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 44(6), 707–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2006.10.002

67.

Teng

E. L.

Lee

P.-H.

Yang

Chang

P. C.

(1976). Handedness in a Chinese population: Biological, social, and pathological factors. Science, 193(4258), 1148–1150. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.986686

68.

Terwee

C. B.

Bot

S. D. M.

de Boer

M. R.

van der Windt

D. A. W. M.

Knol

D. L.

Dekker

Bouter

L. M.

de Vet

H. C. W.

(2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2006.03.012

69.

Tran

U. S.

Voracek

(2015). Evidence of sex-linked familial transmission of lateral preferences for hand, foot, eye, ear, and overall sidedness in a latent variable analysis. Behavior Genetics, 45(5), 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-015-9726-6

70.

Vauclair

Meguerditchian

(2007). Perceptual and motor lateralization in two species of baboons. In Hopkins

(Ed.), The evolution of hamispheric specialization in primates (5th ed., pp. 183–202). Elsevier.

71.

Veale

J. F.

(2014). Edinburgh handedness inventory - short form: A revised version based on confirmatory factor analysis. Laterality, 19(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2013.783045

72.

Vingerhoets

Verhelst

Gerrits

Badcock

Bishop

D. V. M.

Carey

Flindall

Grimshaw

Harris

L. J.

Hausmann

Hirnstein

Jäncke

Joliot

Specht

Westerhausen

LICI consortium . (2023). Laterality indices consensus initiative (LICI): A Delphi expert survey report on recommendations to record, assess, and report asymmetry in human behavioural and brain research. Laterality, 28(2–3), 122–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2023.2199963

73.

von Elm

Altman

D. G.

Egger

Pocock

S. J.

Gøtzsche

P. C.

Vandenbroucke

J. P.

STROBE Initiative . (2014). The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. International Journal of Surgery, 12(12), 1495–1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSU.2014.07.013

74.

Woytowicz

E. J.

Westlake

K. P.

Whitall

Sainburg

R. L.

(2018). Handedness results from complementary hemispheric dominance, not global hemispheric dominance: Evidence from mechanically coupled bilateral movements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 120(2), 729–740. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00878.2017