The Distinctness of Illusory and Non-Illusory Conjunctions in the Perception of Chinese Words: Assessing the Roles of Stimulus Exposure Time

Abstract

Previous studies of illusory conjunction (IC) mainly focused on alphabetic languages, while researchers have poorly understood the IC mechanism of Chinese words as an ideographic writing system. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the dynamic changes of IC effects for Chinese words under different stimulus exposure times and spatial arrangements. We conducted two experiments with a 3 (Condition: IC, non-IC-same, non-IC-different) × 3 (Exposure time: 38 ms, 88 ms, 138 ms) within-subject design. The results showed that in the IC condition, the two characters recombined regardless of exposure time as long as they could form an orthographically correct new word, demonstrating the universality of IC. In non-IC conditions, increasing exposure time decreased response time and significantly reduced error rate, indicating that attention played a decisive role in perceptual processing. The spatial arrangement had no impact on IC production. These findings support the feature confirmation account model, suggesting that attention modulates IC through top-down feature confirmation processes. These data expand an understanding of IC mechanisms, validate the role of attention in feature confirmation, and elucidate the inimitable mechanism of the Chinese word IC influenced by both low-level visual processing and high-level cognitive control.

Keywords

illusory conjunction feature integration exposure time attention level Chinese words

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arguin

Cavanagh

Joanette

(1994). Visual feature integration with an attention deficit. Brain and Cognition, 24(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1994.1003

Beier

Oderkerk

C. A.

(2021). High letter stroke contrast impairs letter recognition of bold fonts. Applied Ergonomics, 97, 103499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103499

Botella

Suero

Barriopedro

M. I.

(2001). A model of the formation of illusory conjunctions in the time domain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(6), 1452–1467. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.27.6.1452

Botella

Suero

Durán

J. I.

(2017). On the reality of illusory conjunctions. The Journal of General Psychology, 144(3), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2017.1299677

Ceja

Franconeri

(2018). A binding illusion of ambiguous color location between two locations. Visual Cognition, 17(1–2), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1167/18.10.475

Chen

Watanabe

(2020). Colour–shape associations affect feature binding. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 28(1), 1–9.

Chen

Zhang

(2004). The automatic activation of morphological phonological semantic information of chinese words in color word interference. Journal of Psychological Science, 27(5), 1112–1115. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2004.05.022

Cobos

M. I.

Chica

A. B.

(2022). Attention does not always help: The role of expectancy, divided, and spatial attention on illusory conjunctions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(11), 2087–2104. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218221089625

Debner

J. A.

Jacoby

L. L.

(1994). Unconscious perception: Attention, awareness, and control. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(2), 304–317. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.20.2.304

10.

Deng

Zhang

(2020). The levels and influencing factors of the illusion conjunction in Chinese. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 18(3), 289–296.

11.

Esteban

R. S.

Chica

A. B.

Paz-Alonso

P. M.

(2023). Functional characterization of correct and incorrect feature integration. Cerebral Cortex, 33(4), 1440–1451. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhac147

12.

Fang

S. P.

(1989). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.15.3.434

13.

Geng

Zhu

(2001). Conscious and unconscious perception: The trade-offs between attention and stimulus quality. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 33(5), 390–397.

14.

Liversedge

S. P.

(2015). Character order processing in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038639

15.

Shi

(2021). The cognitive mechanism of Chinese character position processing and word boundary effect. Advances in Psychological Science, 29(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2021.00191

16.

Gunther

K. L.

McKinney

M. R.

(2020). Poor peripheral binding depends in part on stimulus color. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 82(7), 3606–3617. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02086-z

17.

Henderson

C. M.

Mcclelland

J. L.

(2020). Intrusions into the shadow of attention: A new take on illusory conjunctions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(2), 564–584. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01893-3

18.

Humphreys

G. W.

(2016). Feature confirmation in object perception: Feature integration theory 26 years on from the Treisman Bartlett lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(10), 1910–1940. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.988736

19.

Ivry

R. B.

Prinzmetal

(1991). Effect of feature similarity on illusory conjunctions. Perception and Psychophysics, 49(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03205032

20.

Kristjánsson

Á.

Egeth

(2020). How feature integration theory integrated cognitive psychology, neurophysiology, and psychophysics. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 82(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01803-7

21.

Chen

H. C.

(1999). Radical processing in Chinese character recognition: Evidence from illusory conjunction. Journal of Psychological Science, 22(3), 213–217.

22.

Pollatsek

(2017). Chinese readers can perceive a word even when it's composed of noncontiguous characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(1), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000298

23.

Matthews

Schröder

Kaunitz

Van Boxtel

J. J.

Tsuchiya

(2018). Conscious access in the near absence of attention: Critical extensions on the dual-task paradigm. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 373(1755), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0352

24.

McCrea

S. M.

Buxbaum

L. J.

Coslett

H. B.

(2006). Illusory conjunctions in simultanagnosia: Coarse coding of visual feature location? Neuropsychologia, 44(10), 1724–1736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.017

25.

Merikle

P. M.

Joordens

(1997). Parallels between perception without attention and perception without awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 6(2–3), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1997.0310

26.

Prinzmetal

Henderson

Ivry

(1995). Loosening the constraints on illusory conjunctions: Assessing the roles of exposure duration and attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(6), 1362–1375. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.21.6.1362

27.

Prinzmetal

Keysar

(1989). Functional theory of illusory conjunctions and neon colors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(2), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.118.2.165

28.

Reicher

G. M.

(1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(2), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027768

29.

Treisman

Schmidt

(1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14(1), 107–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90006-8

30.

Treisman

A. M.

Gelade

(1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5

31.

Tsal

Meiran

Lavie

(1994). The role of attention in illusory conjunctions. Perception and Psychophysics, 55(3), 350–358. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03207605

32.

Vul

Rieth

C. A.

Lew

T. F.

Rich

A. N.

(2020). The structure of illusory conjunctions reveals hierarchical binding of multipart objects. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 82(2), 550–563. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01867-5

33.

Wang

Qin

Zhang

(2019). Location effect of Chinese wordable components in the component priming paradigm. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00163

34.

Wolfe

J. M.

Horowitz

T. S.

(2017). Five factors that guide attention in visual search. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0058

35.

Tan

Wang

Chen

(2013). The influencing factors of subliminal semantic priming effects. Advances in Psychological Science, 21(4), 626–636. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2013.00626

36.

Wang

Chen

H. C.

(2015). ERP effects of radical combinability in Chinese character recognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00157

37.

Zhang

Chen

(2018). The recognition of Chinese global characters: Effect of semantic properties between the global characters and their local components. Psychological Exploration, 38(6), 504–508.