In this study, we translated to Turkish and evaluated the validity, reliability, and measurement invariance for respondent sex, grade level and analysis programs the Short Form and Very Short Form of the Positive Youth Development Scale (Turkish version). We had 435 youth, aged 11–17 years, complete the Short (34 items) and Very Short (17 items) Forms of the instrument. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that both forms had a 5-factor structure, and validity testing showed good criterion-related correlation validity between this tool and the Satisfaction with Life Scale. The Short Form had adequate reliability coefficients, but the Very Short Form lacked sufficient reliability for some dimensions. Test-retest correlations were satisfactory for both forms. While the Short and Very Short Forms showed measurement invariance across gender and grade level, CFI, NNFI (TLI), and IFI values diverged between LISREL and AMOS analysis programs. In summary, our data suggest that the Short Form is a reliable measure of positive youth development, while the Very Short Form may not be as reliable due to insufficient confidence values.
Abdul KadirN. B. Y.MohdR. H. (2021). The 5Cs of positive youth development, purpose in life, hope, and well-being among emerging adults in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 641876. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641876.
2.
Akgülİ. (2019). The mediating role of perceived organizational support in the effect of knowledge sharing on employee creativity and innovative behavior: A research on information technology employees. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Business.
3.
AlbrightJ. J.ParkH. M. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis using AMOS, LISREL, Mplus, SAS/STAT CALIS. Indiana University Information Technology Services.
4.
AlparR. (2006). Applied statistics in sport sciences (3rd ed.). Nobel Publication Distribution.
5.
Ayçiçeği-DinnA.Caldwell-HarrisC. L. (2011). Individualism–collectivism among Americans, Turks and Turkish immigrants to the US. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.11.006
6.
BabaeeJ.NajafiM.RezaeiA. (2018). The psychometric properties of positive youth development scale in students. Journal of Psychological Science, 16(64), 540–553.
7.
BeatonD. E.BombardierC.GuilleminF.FerrazM. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
8.
BensonP. L.LeffertN.ScalesP. C.BlythD. A. (1998). Beyond the “village” rhetoric: Creating healthy communities for children and adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 2(3), 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0203_2
9.
BowersE. P.GeldhofG. J.SchmidK. L.NapolitanoC. M.MinorK.LernerJ. V. (2012). Relationships with important nonparental adults and positive youth development: An examination of youth self-regulatory strengths as mediators. Research in Human Development, 9(4), 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2012.725183
10.
BowersE. P.LiY.KielyM. K.BrittianA.LernerJ. V.LernerR. M. (2010). The five Cs model of positive youth development: A longitudinal analysis of confirmatory factor structure and measurement invariance. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(7), 720–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9476-5
11.
BrislinR. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In LonnerW. J.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Sage.
12.
BrunerM. W.EysM. A.WilsonK. S.CôtéJ. (2014). Group cohesion and positive youth development in team sport athletes. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 3(4), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000027
13.
BuenconsejoJ. U.DatuJ. A. D.ChiuM. M.ChanR. C. (2022). Psychometric validity and measurement invariance of positive youth development in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Applied Developmental Science, 27(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2022.2069827
14.
BundickM. J.TirriK. (2014). Student perceptions of teacher support and competencies for fostering youth purpose and positive youth development: Perspectives from two countries. Applied Developmental Science, 18(3), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2014.908253
15.
ByrneB. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4
16.
CatalanoR. F.BerglundM. L.RyanJ. A. M.LonczakH. S.HawkinsJ. D. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 98–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203260102
17.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling. A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
18.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
ConwayR. J.HearyC.HoganM. J. (2015). An evaluation of the measurement properties of the five Cs model of positive youth development. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1941. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01941.
21.
DağlıA.BaysalN. (2016). Adaptation of the satisfaction with life scale into Turkish: The study of validity and reliability. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 15(59), 1250–1262. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.263229
22.
DamonW. (2004). What is positive youth development?The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620326009
23.
DavisM. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10(4), 1–17.
24.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
25.
Domínguez EspinosaA. D. C.WiiumN.JackmanD.Ferrer-WrederL. (2021). Healthy lifestyle behaviors and the 5Cs of positive youth development in Mexico. In Padilla-WalkerL. M.CarloG. (Eds.), Handbook of positive youth development (pp. 109–121). Springer.
26.
DudaJ. L.AllisonM. T. (1990). Cross-cultural analysis in exercise and sport psychology: A void in the field. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 12(2), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.12.2.114
27.
DvorskyM. R.KoflerM. J.BurnsG. L.LuebbeA. M.GarnerA. A.JarrettM. A.SotoE. F.BeckerS. P. (2019). Factor structure and criterion validity of the five Cs model of positive youth development in a multi-university sample of college students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(3), 537–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0938-y
28.
EisenbergN.FabesR. A.MurphyB. C.KarbonM.SmithM.MaszkP. (1996). The relations of children’s dispositional empathy-related responding to their emotionality, regulation, and social functioning. Developmental Psychology, 32(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.2.195
29.
ErentaitėR.RaižienėS. (2015). Lithuanian version of measure of positive youth development based on the Five Cs model. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(6), 701–717. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2015.1091772
30.
FerrerE.HamagamiF.McArdleJ. J. (2004). Modeling latent growth curves with incomplete data using different types of structural equation modeling and multilevel software. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 452–483. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_8
31.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
Gaspar de MatosM.SantosT.ReisM.MarquesA.TomeG.SimoesC.WiiumN. (2018). Portuguese validation of the positive youth development short form (PYD-SF): A shortened version. Psicologia, Saúde & Doenças, 19(3), 477–489. https://doi.org/10.15309/18psd190309
34.
GeldhofG. J.BowersE. P.BoydM. J.MuellerM. K.NapolitanoC. M.SchmidK. L.LernerJ. V.LernerR. M. (2014a). Creation of short and very short measures of the five Cs of positive youth development. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(1), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12043
35.
GeldhofG. J.BowersE. P.MuellerM. K.NapolitanoC. M.CallinaK. S.LernerR. M. (2014b). Longitudinal analysis of a very short measure of positive youth development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(6), 933–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0087-1
36.
GestsdottirS.GeldhofG. J.LernerJ. V.LernerR. M. (2017). What drives positive youth development? Assessing intentional self-regulation as a central adolescent asset. International Journal of Developmental Science, 11(3–4), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-016-0011-1
37.
Gomez-BayaD.Babić ČikešA.HirnsteinM.KurtovićA.VrdoljakG.WiiumN. (2022). Positive youth development and depression: An examination of gender differences in Croatia and Spain. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 820194. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.820194.
38.
Gomez-BayaD.SantosT.Gaspar de MatosM. (2021). Developmental assets and positive youth development: An examination of gender differences in Spain. Applied Developmental Science, 26(3), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2019.1625787
39.
GonzalezJ. M.KozinaA.WiiumN. (2017). Short-form measure of positive youth development: Psychometrics and preliminary findings in Slovenia. In TrommsdorffE.StecherG. D. (Eds.), European congress of developmental psychology (pp. 252–257). Hogrefe Publishing.
40.
GoregenliM. (1995). Individualism collectivism orientations in the Turkish culture: A preliminary study. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 10(35), 1–14.
41.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall.
42.
HarterS. (1983). Supplementary description of the self-perception profile for children: Revision of the perceived competence scale for children. University of Denver. [Unpublished manuscript].
43.
HarterS. (1986). Manual for the self-perception profile for adolescents. University of Denver.
44.
HolsenI.GeldhofJ.LarsenT.AardalE. (2016). The five Cs of positive youth development in Norway: Assessment and associations with positive and negative outcomes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(5), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025416685462
45.
HoltN. L.NeelyK. C. (2011). Positive youth development through sport: A review. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología del Ejercicio y el Deporte, 6(2), 299–316.
46.
HoxJ. J. (1995). Amos, EQS, and LISREL for Windows: A comparative review. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(1), 79–91. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519509539996
47.
IlhanM.CetinB. (2014). Comparing the analysis results of the structural equation models (SEM) conducted using LISREL and AMOS. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation In Education And Psychology, 5(2), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.31126
48.
IwasakiY. (2016). The role of youth engagement in positive youth development and social justice youth development for high-risk, marginalized youth. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 21(3), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2015.1081158
49.
KabirR. S.DokuD. T.WiiumN. (2021). Connection in youth development key to the mental health continuum in Ghana: A structural equation model of thriving and flourishing indicators. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 676376. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.676376.
50.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
51.
LernerJ. V.PhelpsE.FormanY.BowersE. P. (2009). Positive youth development. In LernerR. M.SteinbergL. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology, vol 1: Individual bases of adolescent development (3rd ed., pp. 524–558). John Wiley.
52.
LernerR. M.LernerJ. V.AlmerigiJ. B.TheokasC.PhelpsE.GestsdottirS.NaudeauS.JelicicH.AlbertsA.MaL.SmithL. M.BobekD. L.Richman-RaphaelD.SimpsonI.ChristiansenE. D.Von EyeA. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth-grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H study of positive youth development. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 17–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431604272461
53.
LernerR. M.LernerJ. V.Lewin-BizanS.BowersE. P.BoydM.MuellerM. K.NapolitanoC. M. (2011). Positive youth development: Processes, programs, and problematics. Journal of Youth Development, 6(3), 40–64.
54.
LernerR. M.Von EyeA.LernerJ. V.Lewin-BizanS.BowersE. P. (Eds.), (2010). The meaning and measurement of thriving in adolescence: Findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development [Special issue]. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(7), 113–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9545-9
55.
McDonaldR. P.HoM. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.64
56.
MurphyC. O.DavidshoferK. R. (2005). Psychological testing: Principles and applications. Pearson Education International.
57.
NamS. T.KimD. G.JinC. Y. (2018). A comparison analysis among structural equation modeling (AMOS, LISREL and PLS) using the same data. Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, 22(7), 978–984. https://doi.org/10.6109/jkiice.2018.22.7.978
58.
NewlandA.NewtonM.MooreE. W. G.LeggW. E. (2019). Transformational leadership and positive youth development in basketball. International Sport Coaching Journal, 6(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2017-0038
ParkN. (2009). Building strengths of character: Keys to positive youth development. Reclaiming. Children and Youth, 18(2), 42–47.
61.
PhelpsE.ZimmermanS.WarrenA. E. A.JeličićH.von EyeA.LernerR. M. (2009). The structure and developmental course of positive youth development (PYD) in early adolescence: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 571–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2009.02.003
62.
SandersJ.MunfordR.Thimasarn-AnwarT.LiebenbergL.UngarM. (2015). The role of positive youth development practices in building resilience and enhancing wellbeing for at-risk youth. Child Abuse & Neglect, 42, 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.02.008.
63.
Schermelleh-EngelK.MoosbruggerH.MüllerH. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395793
64.
SchreiberJ. B.NoraA.StageF. K.BarlowE. A.KingJ. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
65.
ShekD. T.ChaiW. (2020). The impact of positive youth development attributes and life satisfaction on academic well-being: A longitudinal mediation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2126. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02126.
66.
SmallS. A.RodgersK. B. (1995). Teen assessment project (TAP) Survey Question Bank. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
67.
SuS.GuoH.LinD. (2017). Positive youth development among Chinese migrant youth: The protective roles of future orientation and social support. In CostaP. T.García-MontalvoJ. T. (Eds.), Well-being of youth and emerging adults across cultures (pp. 209–222). Springer.
68.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
69.
TirrellJ. M.GeldhofG. J.KingP. E.DowlingE. M.SimA. T.WilliamsK.IrahetaG.LernerJ. V.LernerR. M. (2019). Measuring spirituality, hope, and thriving among Salvadoran youth: Initial findings from the compassion international study of positive youth development. Child & youth care forum, 48(2), 241–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-018-9454-1
70.
TomeG.MatosM. G. D.CamachoI.GomesP.ReisM.BranquinhoC. S. D. S.Gomez-BayaD.WiiumN. (2019). Positive youth development (PYD-SF): Validação para os adolescentes portugueses. Psicologia, Saúde & Doenças, 20(3), 556–568. https://doi.org/10.15309/19psd200301
71.
TurnnidgeJ.CôtéJ. (2018). Applying transformational leadership theory to coaching research in youth sport: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16(3), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2017.1410303
72.
TurnnidgeJ.CôtéJ.HancockD. J. (2014). Positive youth development from sport to life: Explicit or implicit transfer?Quest, 66(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2013.829574
73.
TylerC. P.GeldhofG. J.BlackK. L.BowersE. P. (2020). Critical reflection and positive youth development among White and Black adolescents: Is understanding inequality connected to thriving?Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(4), 757–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01111-1
74.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
75.
VellaS. A.OadesL. G.CroweT. P. (2013). The relationship between coach leadership, the coach–athlete relationship, team success, and the positive developmental experiences of adolescent soccer players. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 18(5), 549–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.724952
76.
WongP. W. C.KwokK. W.ChowS. L. (2021). Validation of positive youth development scale and implications for adolescent in Hong Kong community. Child and Youth Care Forum, 50(5), 807–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-021-09670-5
77.
WoolliamsD.SpencerK.WaltersS.KrägelohC. (2021). Resolving uncertainties of the factor structures of the coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q). Australian Journal of Psychology, 73(2), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1882275
78.
WorthingtonR. L.WhittakerT. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
79.
YangP. J.McGinleyM. (2021). Commonalities and specificities of positive youth development in the US and Taiwan. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 73, 101251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101251.
80.
YurdugülH. (2006). The comparison of reliability coefficients in parallel, tau-equivalent, and congeneric measurements. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 39(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000127
