In this study, we compared the orthographic and semantic preferences of healthy adults and age and gender matched adults with aphasia, an acquired language disorder. Previous research in word retrieval and word associations has addressed semantic and phonological connections, but it has not as often included analyses of orthographic skills. We matched (on age and gender) 10 neurotypical adults and 11 older adults with aphasia and administered to both groups a lexical discrimination task requiring them to select, from 18 choices, those words that were most different from three words (daughter, laughter, son). Among the choices were foil words (e.g., daughter), orthographic similarities (laughter) and semantic similarities (son). Results revealed that individuals with aphasia focused on orthographic differences, while healthy adults chose semantic differences. Further studies should further explore this orthographic focus to develop treatment strategies, using behavioral and objective measures, for word-finding deficits in aphasia.
AbelS.WillmesK.HuberW. (2007). Model-oriented naming therapy: Testing predictions of a connectionist model. Aphasiology, 21(5), 411–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701192687
2.
BassoA.MarangoloP.PirasF.GalluzziC. (2001). Accquisition of new “words” in normal participants: A suggestion for the treatment of anomia. Brain and Language, 77(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2422
3.
BestW.HerbertR.HickinJ.OsborneF.HowardD. (2002). Phonological and orthographic facilitation of word-retrieval in aphasia: Immediate and delayed effects. Aphasiology, 16(1–2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17–0214
4.
BestW.NickelsL (2000). From theory to therapy in aphasia: Where are we now and where to next?Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10(3), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/096020100389147
5.
BoyleM (2010). Semantic feature analysis treatment for aphasic word retrieval impairments: What’s in a name?Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 17(6), 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1706-411
6.
BoyleM.CoelhoC. A. (1995). Application of semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 4(4), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0404.94
7.
BrookshireC. E.ConwayT.PomponR. H.OelkeM.KendallD. L. (2014). Effects of intensive phonomotor treatment on reading in eight individuals with aphasia and phonological alexia. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 23(2), S300–S311. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13–0083
8.
BruceC.HowardD. (1988). Why don’t Broca’s aphasics cue themselves? An investigation in phonemic cueing and tip-of-tongue information. Neuropsychologia, 26(2), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(88)90078-4
9.
CaramazzaA. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access?Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 177–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/026432997381664
10.
CherneyL. R.PattersonJ. P.RaymerA.FrymarkT.SchoolingT. (2008). Evidence- based systematic review: Effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 51(5), 1282–1299. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0206)
11.
CoelhoC. A.McHughR. E.BoyleM. (2000). Semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia: A replication. Aphasiology, 14(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870300401513
DellG. S.SchwartzM. F.MartinE. M.GagnonD. A (1997). Lexical access in aphasia and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801–838. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801
14.
EalesC.PringT. (1998). Using individual and group therapy to remediate word finding difficulties. Aphasiology, 12(10), 913–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039808249459
15.
EdmundsL. A.BabbM. (2011). Effect of verb network strengthening treatment in moderate-to-severe aphasia. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 20(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10–0036)
16.
EdmundsL. A.KiranS. (2006). Effects of semantic naming treatment on crosslinguistic generalization in bilingual aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research, 49(4), 729–748. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/053)
17.
EfstratiadouE. A.PapathanasiouI.HollandR.ArchontiA.HilariK (2018). A systematic review of semantic feature analysis therapy studies for aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(5), 1261–1278. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-16-0330
18.
FolsteinM. F.FolsteinS. E.McHughP. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatry Research, 12(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
19.
FranklinS. E.BuerkF.HowardD. (2002). Generalized improvement in speech production for a subject with reproduction conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 16(10–11), 1087–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030244000491
20.
GoldfarbR.Balant-CampbellA. (1984). Cognitive discrimination in brain-damaged adults: Color versus form preference. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.58.1.63–71
21.
GoldfarbR.BekkerN. (2009). Noun-verb ambiguity in chronic undifferentiated schizophrenia. Journal of Communication Disorders, 42(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2008.08.006
22.
GoldfarbR.HalpernH (1989). Impairments of naming and word finding. In CodeC. (Ed.), The characteristics of aphasia (pp. 33–52). Taylor & Francis.
23.
GreenwoodA.GrasslyJ.HickinJ.BestW. (2010). Phonological and orthographic cueing therapy: A case of generalized improvement. Aphasiology, 24(9), 991–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030903168220
24.
HalpernH.GoldfarbR. (2013). Language and motor speech disorders in adults. Jones & Bartlett.
25.
HarnishS. M.MorganJ.LundineJ. P.BauerA.SingletaryF.BenjaminM. L. (2014). Dosing of a cued picture-naming treatment for anomia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23(2), S285–S299. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13–0081
26.
HerbertR.BestW.HickenJ.HowardD.OsborneF. (2001). Phonological and orthographic approaches to the treatment of word retrieval in aphasia. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36(supp l), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682820109177850
27.
HickenJ.BestW.HerbertR.HowardD.OsborneF. (2002). Phonological therapy for word-finding difficulties: A re-evaluation. Aphasiology, 16(10–11), 981–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030244000509
28.
HowardD. (1994). The treatment of acquired aphasia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 346(1315), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1994.0135
29.
HowardD. (2000). Cognitive neuropsychology and aphasia therapy: The case of word retrieval. In PapathanasiouI. (Ed.), Acquired neurogenic communication disorders: A clinical perspective (pp. 76–99). Whurr.
30.
HowardD.HardingD. (1998). Self-cueing of word retrieval by a woman with aphasia: Why a letter board works. Aphasiology, 12(4-5), 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039808249540
31.
HowardD.PattersonK.FranklinS.Orchard-LisleV.MortonJ. (1985a). Treatment of word retrieval deficits in aphasia. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 108(4), 817–829.
32.
HowardD.PattersonK.FranklinS.Orchard-LisleV.MortonJ. (1985b). The facilitation of picture naming in aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2(1), 49–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643298508252861
33.
KendallD. L.MoldestadM. O.AllenW.TorrenceJ.NadeauS. E. (2019). Phonomotor versus semantic feature analysis treatment for anomia in 58 persons with aphasia: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 62(12), 4464–4482. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0257
34.
KendallD. L.OelkeM.BrookshireC. E.NadeuaS. E. (2015). The influence of phonomotor treatment on word retrieval abilities in 26 individuals with chronic aphasia: An open trial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(3), 798–812. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0131
35.
KendallD. L.RosenbekJ. C.HeilmanK. M.ConwayT.KlenbergK.Gonzalez-RothiL. (2008). Phoneme-based rehabilitation of anomia in aphasia. Brain and Language, 105(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.11.007
36.
KerteszA. (2007). The western aphasia battery-revised. Grune & Stratton.
37.
KiranS.BassettoG. (2008). Evaluating the effectiveness of semantic-based treatment for naming deficits in aphasia: What works?Seminar in Speech and Language, 29(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1061626
38.
KiranS.RobertsP. M. (2010). Semantic feature analysis treatment in Spanish–English and French–English bilingual aphasia. Aphasiology, 24(2), 231–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902958365
39.
KiranS.ThompsonC. K. (2003). Effect of typicality on online category verification of animate category exemplars in aphasia. Brain and Language, 85(3), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00064-6
40.
KurlandJ.PulvermullerF.SilvaN.BurkeK.AndrianopoulosM. (2012). Constrained versus unconstrained intensive language therapy in two individuals with chronic, moderate-to-severe aphasia and apraxia of speech: Behavioral and fMRI outcomes. American Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 21(2), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0113)
41.
LaineM.MartinN. (2006). Brain damage, behaviour, and cognition. Anomia: Theoretical and clinical aspects. Psychology Press.
42.
LeonardC.RochonE.LairdL. (2008). Treating naming impairments in aphasia: Findings from a phonological components analysis treatment. Aphasiology, 22(9), 923–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701831474
43.
LeveltW. J.RoelofsA.MeyerA. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x99001776
LowellS.BeesonP. M.HollandA. L. (1995). The efficacy of a semantic cueing procedure on naming abilities of adults with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language. Pathology, 4(4), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0404.109
46.
MaddyK. M.CapiloutoG. J.McComasK. L. (2014). The effectiveness of semantic feature analysis: An evidence-based systematic review. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 57(4), 254–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2014.03.002
MarcotteK.PerlbargV.MarrelecG.BenaliH.Ines AnsaldoA. (2013). Default-mode network functional connectivity in aphasia: Therapy-Induced neuroplasticity. Brain and Language, 124(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.11.004
49.
MarshallJ.PoundC.White-thomsonM.PringT. (1990). The use of picture/word matching tasks to assist word retrieval in aphasic patients. Aphasiology, 4(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039008249068
50.
MinkinaI.Oelke MoldestadM.BislickL.BrookshireC.Hunting PomponRSilkesJ (2015). An investigation of aphasic naming error evolution following phonomotor treatment. Aphasiology, 30(8), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-19–0014
51.
MinkinaI.SilkesJ. P.BislickL.Brookshire MaddenE.LaiV.Hunting PomponR. (2019). The influence of phonomotor treatment on word retrieval: Insights from naming errors. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 62(11), 4080–4104. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-19-0014
52.
NeumannY. (2018). A case series comparison of semantically focused versus phonologically focused cued naming treatment in aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 32(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2017.1326166
53.
NickelsL. A. (1992). Self-generated phonemic cues in the treatment of a disorders of reading and naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9(2), 155–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299208252057
NickelsL. A.BestW. (1996a). Therapy for naming deficits (Part I): Principles, puzzles and progress. Aphasiology, 10(1), 21-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039608248397.
56.
NickelsL. A.BestW. (1996b). Therapy for naming deficits (Part II): specifics, surprises and suggestions. Aphasiology, 10(2), 109–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039608248401
57.
PattersonK. E.PurellC.MortonJ. (1983). Facilitation of word retrieval in aphasia. In CodeC.MillerD. J. (Eds.), Aphasia therapy (pp. 76–87). Edward Arnold.
58.
PulvermullerF.NeiningerB.ElbertT.MohrB.RockstrohB.KoebbelP. (2001). Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke; A Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 32(7), 1621–1626. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.7.1621
59.
RalphM. A. L.SnellC.FillinghamJ. K.ConroyP.SageK (2010). Predicting the outcome of anomia therapy for people with aphasia post CVA: Both language and cognitive status are key predictors. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 20(2), 289-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010903237875
RaymerA. M.ThompsonC. K.JacobsB.Le GrandH. R. (1993). Phonological treatment of naming deficits in aphasia: Model-based generalization analysis. Aphasiology, 7(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039308249498
62.
RochonE.LairdL.BoseA.ScofieldJ. (2005). Mapping therapy for sentence production impairments in nonfluent aphasia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 15(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010343000327
63.
RoseM. L. (2006). The utility of arm hand gestures in the treatment of aphasia. Advanced Speech Langugae Pathology, 8(2), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/14417040600657948
64.
SchwartzM. F.DellG. S.MartinN.GahlS.SobelP. (2006). A case-series test of the interactive two-step models of lexical access: Evidence from picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(2), 228–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.001
65.
VitaliP.AbutalebiJ.TettamantiM.DannaM.AnsaldoA. I.PeraniD. (2007). Training-induced brain remapping in chronic aphasia: A pilot study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 21(2), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968306294735
