Abstract
The complex interactions between people, domestic animals and the environment have led to animals being assigned different roles in different regions of the world, in pastoral, semipastoral and commercial farming societies. These roles depend on the value system of the society and on its attitude to risks. There are many sources of risk in animal production systems, including environmental risks, wars, civil unrest and the economic risks associated with high inputs, and these will be perceived differently according to the society: high inputs, for instance, tend to decrease risk in intensive farming, but increase it in pastoral systems. While monetary returns are the driving force in a free-market economy, biological survival and established cultural tradition may define the essential values of a peasant community. In view of these differences an alternative research paradigm, relevant to the needs of traditional production systems and based on risk-spreading criteria, is presented here for consideration by animal scientists.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
