The carcass is central to improvements in the efficiency of beef production. Carcass quality is the primary measure of output and a key selection criterion; it is the focus of trade and of marketing efforts by farmers to adapt output to changing demand. This article reviews recent developments in the search for more accurate methods of assessing carcass quality in breeding programmes and in carcass classification and grading schemes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KempslerA. J., CuthbertsonA., and HarringtonG. ‘Carcase Evaluation in Livestock Breeding, Production and Marketing’, Granada Press, London. 1982.
2.
European Association for Animal Production, ‘Beef carcases–-methods of dressing, measuring, jointing and tissue separation’ EAAP Publication no. 18, Meat Research Institute, Bristol. 1976.
3.
WilliamsD. R., and BergstromP. L. ‘Anatomical Joint, Tissue Separation and Weight Recording proposed as the EEC Standard Method for Beer. CEC Luxembourg (EUR 5720). 1976.
4.
CrossH. R. American Meat Science Association Carcass Composition Guidelines. To be published in the Proceedings of the 36th Annual Reciprocal Meal Conference, North Dakota State University. 1983.
5.
Commission of the European Communities. ‘Development of Uniform Methods of Pig Carcase Classification in the EC’. Information on Agriculture Series. no. 70, Brussels–-Luxembourg, CEC. 1979.
6.
MilesC. A. Note on recent advances in ultrasonic scanning of animals. Proc. 24th European Meat Research Workers’ Congress, Kulmbach, pp W13.3–W13.6. 1978.
7.
TullohN. M., TruscottT. G., and LangC. P. ‘An Evaluation of the Scanogram for Predicting the Carcase Composition of Live Cattle’. A report submitted to the Australian Meat Board. School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne. 1973.
8.
KempsterA. J., CuthbertsonA., JonesD. W., and OwenM. G.J. agric Sci., Camb. 96, 301, 1981.
9.
Bech AndersenB., BuskH., ChadwickJ. P., CuthbertsonA., FurseyG. A. J., LewinP., MilesC. A., and OwenM. G. ‘Ultrasonic Techniques for Describing Carcase Characteristics in Live Cattle’. CEC Luxembourg (EUR 7640), 1981.
10.
Bech AndersenB. (Editor)“In Vivo Estimation of Body Composition in Beef. Report on a CEC Workshop held in Copenhagen, December, 1981, 524 Beretning fra Statens Husdyrbrugs forsøg. 1982.
11.
AbrahamH. C., MurpheyC. E., CrossH. R., SmithG. C., and FranksW. J.Jr.J. Anim. Sci. 50, 841, 1980.
12.
CrouseJ. D., and DikemanM. E.J. Anim. Sci. 42, 584, 1976.
13.
PowellW. E., and HuffmanD. L.J. Anim. Sci., 27, 1554, 1968.
14.
KempsterA. J., and ChadwickJ. P.Prediction of beef carcass composition from fat and muscle measurements taken on cut surfaces between the 6th and 13th ribs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. (in press). 1983.
15.
De BoerH., DumontB. L., PomeroyR. W., and WenigerH. H.Livest. Prod. Sci. 1, 151, 1974.
16.
ArndtG.A state-of-the-art survey of the application and development of the FDI and HGP. 32nd Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production. Zagreb, 1981.
17.
LuckockC. R. ‘A Test of Three Electronic Fat Probes for Measuring the Fat Depth of Hot Unquartered Beef Carcases’. Report to the National Carcase Classification Steering Committee. 1979.
18.
ChadwickJ. P., and KempsterA. J.The estimation of beef carcass composition from subcutaneous fat measurements taken on the intact side using different probing instruments. J. agric. Sci. Camb. (in press). 1983.
19.
KutskyJ. A., MurpheyC. E., SmithG. C., SavellJ. W., StufferD. M., and TerrellR. N.J. Anim. Sci. 55, 565, 1982.
