The importance of mechanisation in improving agricultural productivity needs no emphasis, but the most appropriate system depends very much on local socio-economic factors. In western countries, where labour is scarce and expensive, the tractor and an associated range of implements may well be the most attractive choice on the basis of cost-benefit analysis. However, in many Third World countries—where quite different socio-economic situations prevail—the use of animal power, or even simply of human power using improved hand implements, may be the more attractive.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LonnemarkH. ‘Multifarm use of agricultural machinery’. FAO, Rome. 1967.
2.
PollardS., and MorrisJ.The Agricultural Engineer, 33, 29, 1978.
3.
GilesG. W. In ‘Report of Expert Panel on the Effect of Mechanisation on Production and Employment in Agriculture’, FAO.Rome. Feb. 4-7, 1975.
ITDG (various).Agricultural equipment and tools for farmers designed for local construction: design notes. Intermediate Technology Development Group Ltd., Shinfield, Reading.
6.
MorrisJ., and PollardS.International Agricultural Development, Nov. 1981.
7.
MettrickH. ‘Oxenisation in the Gambia: an Evaluation’. ODM (UK). 1977.
8.
DaltonG. E. ‘British Aid Tractors in India; an Expost Evaluation’. ODA (UK). 1976.
9.
EicherC. ‘Employment generation in African Agriculture’. Institute of International Agriculture, Michigan State University.1970.
10.
YudelmanM., ButlerG., and BanerjiR. ‘Technological Change in Agriculture and Employment in Developing Countries’. OECD, Paris.1971.
11.
MettrickH., RoyS., and ThorntonD. S.Agricultural Mechanisation in Southern Asia’. A Report to ODA (UK). Reading University.
12.
BartschW. H. ‘Employment and Technology Choice in Asian Agriculture’. Praeger, 1977.
13.
RoyS., and BlaseM. G.Journal of Development Studies, 14, 2, 1978.
14.
BalaB. K., and HussainA.Agric. Mech. in Asia, 11, 3, 1978.
15.
El HagH. E.In ‘Report of Expert Panel on the Effect of Mechanisation on Production and Employment in Agriculture’, FAO, Rome. 1975.
16.
ClaytonE. S. In ‘Mechanisation and Employment in Agriculture’ ILO, Geneva, 1973.
17.
AbercrombieK. C. In ‘Mechanisation and Employment in Agriculture’, ILO, Geneva, 1973.
18.
McInernayJ. P., and DonaldsonE. F. ‘The Consequences of Farm Tractors in Pakistan’. Working Paper 21D, IBRD, Washington.1975.
19.
KahlonA. S.impact of Mechanisation on Punjab Agriculture’. Dept. Econ., Punjab Agricultural University, Mimeo. 1975.
20.
SinghR. P., and GaswamiH. E. ‘A Comparative Study of Tractorised and Bullock Operated Farms in Punea District, India’. Agro-Econ. Res. Centre, University of Allahabad. Mimeo. 1977.
21.
Era 2000 Inc. ‘Further Mechanisation of Egyptian Agriculture’. Gaithersbury, Maryland. 1979.
22.
GotschC. H. In “Mechanisation and Employment in Agriculture”. ILO, Geneva. 1975.
23.
StoutB. A., and DowningC. M. In ‘Report of Expert Panel on the Effect of Mechanisation on Production and Employment in Agriculture’. FAO, Rome. Feb. 4-7. 1975.
24.
VossC. In ‘Report of Expert Panel on the Effect of Mechanisation on Production and Employment in Agriculture’. FAO, Rome. Feb. 4-7. 1975.