Myanmar has experienced considerable economic and social changes since its political transition in the early 2010s. Its agriculture sector has demonstrated rapid intensification and modernization. Agricultural best management practices (BMPs), e.g., drum seeders and laser land levelling, were introduced to rice farmers in Bago Region in 2012 to increase sustainable production and counter negative environmental impacts. The objective of this study was to determine the socioeconomic and agronomic changes due to the adoption of BMPs between adopters and non-adopters. Using a digital survey questionnaire application to collect household data, 200 farmers in eight villages were interviewed in 2012 and 2017. Data were analysed using uni- and multivariate statistics. Mediation analysis was utilized to evaluate the effect of the farmer group on rice yields. Overall, all farmers in this study experienced substantial positive changes over the course of five years in line with the national development efforts. Differences among adopters and non-adopters were not significant, but notable distinctions existed between cropping patterns. Rice-pulse farmers had higher yields ( + 0.4 t/ha), yet rice-rice farmers had larger cultivation areas, received higher agricultural credits, and had superior income levels. Nevertheless, rice yields remained low (<4 t/ha). Education was found to be an important predictor of yield. Hence, this factor is crucial for accelerating agricultural development in Myanmar. Improving extension services and knowledge transfer are necessary to expand the dissemination of sustainable BMPs and make farmers more resilient against the negative implications of climate change.
AbdulaiAOwusuVBakangJ-EA (2011) Adoption of safer irrigation technologies and cropping patterns: Evidence from Southern Ghana. Ecological Economics70(7). Special Section: Ecological Economics and Environmental History: 1415–1423.
2.
AdarshSJacobJGiffyT (2019) Role of pulses in cropping systems: A review. Agricultural Reviews40(3): 185–191.
3.
AdriJRahimBRefdina, et al. (2020) Rice thresher machines in handling system alley blow rice in post-HarvestJournal of Physics: Conference Series1594(012028): –8.
4.
AramburuJFigal GaroneLMaffioliA, et al. (2019) Direct and Spillover Effects of Agricultural Technology Adoption Programs: Experimental Evidence from the Dominican Republic. IDB Working Paper Series IDB-WP-00971. New York, NY, USA: Inter-American Development Bank.
5.
AungNNguyenH-T-MSparrowR (2019) The impact of credit policy on rice production in Myanmar. Journal of Agricultural Economics70(2): 426–451.
6.
AungNM (2011) Agricultural efficiency of rice farmers in Myanmar: A case study in selected areas. IDE Discussion Papers 306. Chiba, Japan: Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO).
7.
Aye AyeMKraasFSpohnerR, et al. (2017) Socio-Economic Atlas of Myanmar. Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden GmbH.
8.
BeltonBFilipskiM (2019) Rural transformation in central Myanmar: By how much, and for whom?Journal of Rural Studies67: 166–176.
9.
BeltonBWinMTZhangX, et al. (2021) The rapid rise of agricultural mechanization in Myanmar. Food Policy101: 102095.
10.
CastelliGOoWMdi MaggioA, et al. (2020) Participatory analysis of sustainable land and water management practices for integrated rural development in Myanmar. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development11(1): 26–36.
11.
CawleyAO’DonoghueCHeanueK, et al. (2019) The impact of agricultural knowledge transfer resources on farm level profitability during the economic recession – a quantitative study. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension25(2). Routledge: 161–177.
12.
ChakeredzaSTemuABSakaJDK, et al. (2008) Tailoring tertiary agricultural education for sustainable development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Opportunities and challenges. Scientific Research and Essays3(8). Academic Journals: 326–332.
13.
ChandiramaniMKosinaPJonesJ (2007) Laser land leveling - a precursor technology for resource conservation. Fact Sheet. IRRI-CIMMYT Alliance Cereal Knowledge Bank.
14.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edHillsdale, NJ, USA: L. Erlbaum Associates.
15.
ConnorMde GuiaAHPustikaAB, et al. (2021b) Rice farming in central Java, Indonesia—adoption of sustainable farming practices, impacts and implications. Agronomy11(5). 5. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute:1–14.
16.
ConnorMQuilloyRde GuiaAH, et al. (2021a) Sustainable rice production in Myanmar impacts on food security and livelihood changes. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability22(1): 88–102. DOI: 10.1080/14735903.2021.1918471.
17.
ConnorMSanSS (2021) Sustainable rice farming and its impact on rural women in Myanmar. Development in Practice31(1). Routledge:49–58.
18.
Danso-AbbeamGEhiakporDSAidooR (2018) Agricultural extension and its effects on farm productivity and income: Insight from Northern Ghana. Agriculture & Food Security7(74): 1–10.
19.
DapiceDOVallelyTJWilkinsonB, et al. (2011) Myanmar Agriculture in 2011: Old Problems and New Challenges. Cambridge, MA, USA: Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, Harvard Kennedy School.
20.
DeepMKumarRMSahaS, et al. (2018) Rice-based cropping systems for enhancing productivity of food grains in India: Decadal experience of AICRP. Indian Farming68(1): 1–4.
21.
DuboisMJAkesterMLeemansK, et al. (2019) Integrating fish into irrigation infrastructure projects in Myanmar: Rice-fish what if…?Marine and Freshwater Research70(9). CSIRO PUBLISHING: 1229–1240.
FlorRJMaatHLeeuwisC, et al. (2017) Adaptive research with and without a learning alliance in Myanmar: Differences in learning process and agenda for participatory research. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences81(1). Taylor & Francis: 33–42.
24.
FlorRJTuanLAHungNV, et al. (2021) Unpacking the processes that catalyzed the adoption of best management practices for lowland irrigated rice in the Mekong Delta. Agronomy11(9). 9. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute: 1–18.
25.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2016) Pulses: Nutritious Seeds for a Sustainable Future. Rome, Italy: FAO. DOI: 10.4060/i5528e.
26.
ForsythTSpringate-BaginskiO (2021) Are landscape approaches possible under authoritarianism? Multi-stakeholder governance and social transformation in Myanmar. Environmental Science & Policy124: 359–369.
27.
Forté-GardnerOYoungFLDillmanDA, et al. (2004) Increasing the effectiveness of technology transfer for conservation cropping systems through research and field design. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems19(4). Cambridge University Press:199–209.
28.
GaoYZhaoDYuL, et al. (2020) Influence of a new agricultural technology extension mode on farmers’ technology adoption behavior in China. Journal of Rural Studies76: 173–183.
29.
Global Rice Science Partnership (GRiSP) (2013) Rice Almanac: Source Book for One of the Most Important Economic Activities on Earth, 4th edLos Baños, Philippines: IRRI.
30.
GloverDSumbergJAnderssonJA (2016) The adoption problem; or why we still understand so little about technological change in African agriculture. Outlook on Agriculture45(1). SAGE Publications Ltd: –6.
31.
GriggDB (2001) Green revolution. In: SmelserNJBaltesPB (eds) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Oxford, UK: Pergamon, pp.6389–6393. DOI: 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/04157-7
32.
GummertMCabardoCQuilloyR, et al. (2020) Assessment of post-harvest losses and carbon footprint in intensive lowland rice production in Myanmar. Scientific Reports10(19797). 1. Nature Publishing Group: 1–13.
33.
HaggbladeSBoughtonDChoKM, et al. (2014) Strategic choices shaping agricultural performance and food security in Myanmar. Journal of International Affairs67(2). Journal of International Affairs Editorial Board: 55–71.
34.
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) (2018) Closing rice yield gaps in Asia (CORIGAP) - Myanmar. Available at: https://corigap.irri.org/countries/myanmar (accessed 17 January 2021).
JansenLJMKalasPPBicchieriM (2021) Improving governance of tenure in policy and practice: The case of Myanmar. Land Use Policy100: 104906.
40.
JatMLChandnaPGuptaR, et al. (2006) Laser land leveling: A precursor technology for resource conservation. Rice-Wheat Consortium Technical Bulletin Series7: 1–48.
41.
KabirHUphoffN (2007) Results of disseminating the system of rice intensification with farmer field school methods in northern Myanmar. Experimental Agriculture43(4). Cambridge University Press: 463–476.
42.
KondylisFMuellerVZhuJ (2017) Seeing is believing? Evidence from an extension network experiment. Journal of Development Economics125: 1–20.
43.
KristunasCASmithKLGrayLJ (2017) An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome. Trials18(1): 09.
44.
LampayanRMRejesusRMSingletonGR, et al. (2015) Adoption and economics of alternate wetting and drying water management for irrigated lowland rice. Field Crops Research170: 95–108.
45.
LarNMArunratNTintS, et al. (2018) Assessment of the potential climate change on rice yield in lower ayeyarwady delta of Myanmar using EPIC model. Environment and Natural Resources Journal16(2). 2: 45–57. Available at: https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ennrj/article/view/118648 (accessed 21 January 2021).
46.
LinnTMaenhoutB (2019) The impact of environmental uncertainty on the performance of the rice supply chain in the ayeyarwady region. Myanmar. Agricultural and Food Economics7(11): 1–29.
47.
MinAKudoT (2013) New government’s initiatives for industrial development in Myanmar. In: LimHYamadaY (eds) Economic Reforms in Myanmar: Pathways and Prospects. BRC Research Report 10. Bangkok, Thailand: Bangkok Research Center, IDE-JETRO, pp.39–84.
48.
MoeisFRDartantoTMoeisJP, et al. (2020) A longitudinal study of agriculture households in Indonesia: The effect of land and labor mobility on welfare and poverty dynamics. World Development Perspectives20(100261): 1–17.
49.
MolleF (2020) Agrarian change in the central plain of Thailand (1950-2020): A longitudinal study of farm characteristics. Japan-ASEAN Transdisciplinary Studies Project (J-ASEAN), Center for Southeast Asian Studies (CSEAS), Kyoto University. Available at: DOI: 10.14989/TDWPS_9 (accessed 13 October 2021).
50.
MtegaWPNgoepeM (2018) Strengthening the Flow of Agricultural Knowledge among Agricultural Stakeholders: The Case of Morogoro Region in Tanzania. IntechOpen. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.72731.
51.
MuraokaRFuruyaJHiranoA, et al. (2021) Climate risk and agricultural technology adaption: Evidence from rice farmers in the Ayeyarwady River delta of Myanmar. Paddy and Water Environment: 1–14. DOI: 10.1007/s10333-021-00870-7.
52.
Myanmar Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation (2015) Myanmar Rice Sector Development Strategy. Naypyitaw, Myanmar: The Government of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar.
53.
Myanmar Ministry of Commerce and International Trade Centre (2015) National Export Strategy - Rice: Sector Strategy 2015-2019. Naypyitaw, Myanmar: Myanmar Department of Trade Promotion, Ministry of Commerce.
54.
NaingTaAKingsburyAJBuerkertA, et al. (2008) A survey of Myanmar rice production and constraints. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (JARTS)109(2). 2: 151–168.
55.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2015) Multi-Dimensional Review of Myanmar: Volume 2. In-Depth Analysis and Recommendations. OECD Development Pathways. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/9789264220577-en.
56.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2017) OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2017-2026. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/agr_outlook-2017-5-en.
57.
PalisFGMalabayabasAJBSingletonGR, et al. (2016) Early harvest of monsoon rice to address seasonal hunger in northwest Bangladesh. Food Security8(2): 443–457.
58.
PhyoASGrunbuhelCMWilliamsL, et al. (2019) Does selective mechanization make up for labour shortages in rural Myanmar?IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science338(012010): 1–12.
59.
RahmanMThantAWinM, et al. (2015) Participatory varietal selection (PVS): A “bottom-up” breeding approach helps rice farmers in the ayeyarwady delta, Myanmar. SABRAO journal of breeding and genetics47: 299–314.
60.
RaitzerDWongLCYSamsonJN (2015) Myanmar’s Agriculture Sector: Unlocking the Potential for Inclusive Growth. ADB Economics Working Paper Series 470. Manila, Philippines: ADB.
61.
ReimersMKlasenS (2013) Revisiting the role of education for agricultural productivity. American Journal of Agricultural Economics95(1): 131–152.
62.
RogersEM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edNew York, NY, USA: Free Press.
63.
RojasMF (2018) Gender Sensitive Labour Saving Technology - Drum Seeders: Saving Time, Effort and Money. A Case Study from the Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Bangkok, Thailand: FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.
64.
ShewAMDurand-MoratAPutmanB, et al. (2019) Rice intensification in Bangladesh improves economic and environmental welfare. Environmental Science & Policy95: 46–57.
65.
SingletonGLabiosR (2019) Diversification and intensification of rice-based cropping systems in lower Myanmar (MyRice). FR2019–78, Final Report. Canberra, Australia: ACIAR.
66.
SnoxellSLyneM (2019) Constraints to commercialisation of smallholder agriculture in Tanintharyi division, Myanmar. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (JARTS)120(2). 2: 219–227.
67.
StuartAMPameARPSilvaJV, et al. (2016) Yield gaps in rice-based farming systems: Insights from local studies and prospects for future analysis. Field Crops Research194: 43–56.
68.
StürWKhanhTTDuncanA (2013) Transformation of smallholder beef cattle production in Vietnam. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability11(4). Taylor & Francis: 363–381.
69.
SundingDZilbermanD (2001) The agricultural innovation process: Research and technology adoption in a changing agricultural sector. In: GardnerBLRausserGC (eds) Handbook of Agricultural Economics. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland, pp.207–261.
70.
ThantAATeutscherovaNVazquezE, et al. (2020) On-farm rice diversity and farmers’ preferences for varietal attributes in ayeyarwady Delta, Myanmar. Journal of Crop Improvement34(4). Taylor & Francis: 549–570.
71.
TunTKennedyANischanU (2015) Promoting Agricultural Growth in Myanmar: A review of policies and an assessment of knowledge gaps. ReSAKSS-Asia Working Paper 7. Washington D.C., USA: IFPRI.
72.
TunYKangH-J (2015) An analysis on the factors affecting rice production efficiency in Myanmar. Journal of East Asian Economic Review19(2): 167–188.
73.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2016) Myanmar. Available at: http://uis.unesco.org/en/country/mm (accessed 23 November 2020).
van CrowderLLindleyWIBrueningT, et al. (1998) Agricultural education for sustainable rural development: challenges for developing countries in the 21st century. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension5(2). Routledge: 71–84.
76.
WehmeyerHde GuiaAHConnorM (2020) Reduction of fertilizer use in south China—impacts and implications on smallholder rice farmers. Sustainability12(6). 6. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute: 1–21.
77.
World Bank (2019) Myanmar Rice and Pulses: Farm Production Economics and Value Chain Dynamics. Washington D.C., USA: World Bank Group.
YuYuTHye-JungK (2015) An analysis on the factors affecting rice production efficiency in Myanmar. Journal of East Asian Economic Integration19(2): 167–188.
80.
ZilbermanD (2008) Diffusion of agricultural technology. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp.2816–2811. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2816-1.
