The study was conducted in jute-growing areas of West Bengal (India) to explore the potential resource use efficiency for economic benefits of selected climate smart practices to marginal landholder farmers. Integrated crop management (ICM) practices as part of climate smart jute farming (CSJF) was practised by 170 randomly selected farmers in six villages. An estimation of cost of adoption, change in fibre yields, net returns and human development index (HDI) before and after ICM interventions was done. The mean HDI value increased by 38.85% and farm income by 31.5%. The net benefits of adaptation to climate smart jute technologies were estimated based on specific adaptation actions. Empirical scientific evidence of the study indicates that the livelihoods of marginal landholders can be improved using new crop varieties, changing planting dates and bringing necessary changes in other variable inputs for line sowing, intercropping, weeding, nutrients, water and retting.
AggarwalPKJarvisACampbellBM. (2018) The climate-smart village approach: framework of an integrative strategy for scaling up adaptation options in agriculture. Ecology and Society23(1):14. DOI: 10.5751/ES-09844-230114.
2.
AlamMMKarimRLadhaJK (2013) Integrating best management practices for rice with farmers’ crop management techniques: a potential option for minimizing rice yield gap. Field Crops Res. 144:62–68.
3.
BalasubramanianVRajendranRRaviV. (2005) Integrated crop management for enhancing yield, factor productivity and profitability in Asian rice farms. Paper presented at the FAO Viet Nam Consultation Workshop on Rice Integrated Crop Management Systems – Rice Check Methodology for Food Security, Livelihood Improvement and Environmental Conservation, Ho Chi Minh, 28 Feb–2 Mar 2005, pp. 63–72.
4.
CRIJAF (2015) Vision 2050. Kolkata: ICAR-Central Research Institute for Jute and Fibre Crops.
5.
CampbellCALafondGPVandenbygaartAJ. (2011) Effect of crop rotation, fertilizer and tillage management on spring wheat grain yields and N and P content in a thin Black Chernozem: a long term study. Canadian Journal of Plant Science91(3):467–483.
6.
DAC (2018) Agriculture Census 2015-16. New Delhi: Agriculture Census Division Department of Agriculture, Co-Operation & Farmers Welfare Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India.
7.
DasSMajumdarBSahaAR (2015) Biodegradation of plant pectin and hemicelluloses with three novel Bacillus pumilus strains and their combined application for quality jute fibre production. Agriculture Research4(4):354–364.
8.
DasSMajumdarBSahaAR. (2018) Comparative study of conventional and improved retting of jute with microbial formulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India, Section B: Biological Science88:1351–1357.
9.
FAOSTAT (2016) Statistical database of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO). Available athttp://faostat3.fao.org/home/E (accessed 24 May 2017).
10.
GeethalakshmiVPalanismyKAggarwalPK. (2009) Impact of climate change on rice, maize and sorghum productivity in Tamil Nadu. In: AggarwalPK (ed.), Global climate change and Indian agriculture: Case studies from the ICAR network project. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR), pp. 13–18.
11.
GhoraiAKMukeshKShaileshK. (2015) Intercropping in jute with green gram for weed smothering. Paper presented at theAsian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference on Weed Science for Sustainable Agriculture, Environment and Biodiversity, during13–16 October 2015, Hyderabad, India
12.
GhoraiAKMukeshKKarCS (2016) Weed smothering in jute with green gram intercropping. Indian Journal of Weed Science48(3):343–344.
13.
GVR (2015) Global Geotextiles Market Size, Trends and Forecasts to 2020. San Francisco: Grand view research (GVR) Inc.
14.
IJSG (2013) Carbon credit of jute and sustainable environment, International Jute Study Group (IJSG). Jute Matter1(7):1–2.
15.
MajumdarBSuparnaDSahaAR. (2013) Improved Retting of Jute and Mesta with Microbial Formulation. Kolkata: ICAR-Central Research Institute for Jute and Allied Fibres.
16.
MEF (2004) India’s Initial National Communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests (MEF).
17.
MOT (2016) Office of the Jute Commissioner, Ministry of Textiles (MOT). Available at: http://www.jutecomm.gov.in (accessed 7 August 2017).
RajagopalKSanyalT (2012) Sustainable Infrastructure Development Including Limited Life Geosynthetics. Bangkok: Proceedings of Geosynthetics Asia 2012.
20.
SahaMNSahaARMandalBC. (2000) Effect of long-term jute-rice-wheat cropping system on crop yields and soil fertility. In: AbrolIPBronsonKFDuxburyJMGuptaRK (eds), Long-Term Soil Fertility Experiments in Rice-Wheat Cropping Systems. New Delhi: Rice-Wheat Consortium for the Indo-Gangetic Plains, pp 94–104.
21.
SinghAK (2017) The potential of jute crop for mitigation of greenhouse gas emission in the changing climatic scenario. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences13(2):419–423.
22.
SinghAKBarmanDKunduDK (2017a) Impact of rainfall and temperature change on productivity of jute, rice and wheat under long term fertilizer experiment. Paper presented at the National Seminar onNutrients and pollutants in soil-plant-animal-human continuum for sustaining soil, food and nutritional security - way forward, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, 9–10 June 2017, Kalyani, West Bengal (India).
23.
SinghAKMukeshKMitraS (2018) Carbon footprint and energy use in jute and allied fibre production. The Indian Journal of Agriculture Science88(8):1305–1311.
24.
SinghAKBeheraMSBarmanD. (2018a) Modelling carbon sequestration under jute based agro-ecosystem. Annual Report 2017-18, Kolkata: ICAR-Central Research Institute for Jute and Allied Fibres.
25.
SinghRPDasSKBhaskar RaoVM. (1990) Towards Sustainable Dry Land Agriculture Practices. Hyderabad: Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture.
26.
UNDP (2017) Human Development for Everyone. New York: Human Development Report 2016.
