The aim of this study was to measure the technical efficiency and productivity performance of livestock production activities across different regions of Vietnam, based on panel data covering the period 2008–2012. Although efficiency improvements did occur in some regions over this period, low technical efficiency, poor productivity performance, and variations in performance composition dominate across most regions. Households that depend heavily on the livestock income particularly or the agricultural income generally are more vulnerable than others in terms of livestock production.
Agrifood Consulting International (2001) Policy Option for Using Livestock to Promote Rural Income Diversification and Growth in Vietnam. Hanoi: International Food Policy Research Institute.
2.
AkterSJabbarMAEhuiSK (2003) Competitiveness and efficiency in poultry and pig production in Vietnam (Socio-economics and Policy Research Working Paper 57). Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute.
3.
AlirezaeeMRHowlandMVan De PanneC (1998) Sampling size and efficiency bias in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Applied Mathematics & Decision Sciences2(1):51–64.
4.
AndorMHesseF (2011) A Monte Carlo simulation comparing DEA, SFA and two simple approaches to combine efficiency estimates. CAWM Discussion Paper, University of Münster, 51. Available at: http://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/51383/1/672474034.pdf
CoelliT (1995) Recent developments in frontier modeling and efficiency measurement. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics Research39:219–245.
7.
CoelliTPrasada RaoDSBatteseGE (1998) An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8.
EfronB (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the Jackknife. The Annals of Statistics7:1–26.
9.
FarrellMJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General)120(3):253–290.
10.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (1979) Production Yearbook. Rome: FAO.
11.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2005) Livestock sector brief - Vietnam. Rome: FAO.
12.
General Statistics Office of Vietnam (GSO) (2008) Vietnam Access to Resources Household Survey. Hanoi: Statistical Publishing House.
13.
General Statistics Office of Vietnam (GSO) (2010) Characteristics of the Vietnamese Rural Economy: Evidence from a 2010 Rural Household Survey in 12 Provinces of Vietnam. Hanoi: GSO.
14.
General Statistics Office of Vietnam (GSO) (2012a) Statistical Database. Hanoi: GSO.
15.
General Statistics Office of Vietnam (GSO) (2012b) Vietnam Access to Resources Household Survey. Hanoi: Statistical Publishing House.
16.
HayamiYRuttanVW (1970) Agricultural productivity differences among countries. The American Economic Review60(5):895–911.
17.
JahnkeHE (1982) Livestock Production Systems and Livestock Development in Tropical Africa. Kiel: Kieler Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk.
18.
Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD) (2012) The 2011 – 2020 Restructuring Scheme on Agriculture Sector. Hanoi: MARD.
19.
O’DonnellCJPrasada RaoDSBatteseGE (2008) Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Empirical Economics34:231–255.
20.
Prasada RaoDSO’DonnellCJBatteseGE (2003) Metafrontier functions for the study of inter-regional productivity differences. CEPA Working Papers Series(WP012003), School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
21.
SimarLWilsonPW (1998) Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science44(11):49–61.
22.
SimarLWilsonPW (2000) Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: the state of the art. Journal of Productivity Analysis13(1):49–78.
23.
SimarLWilsonPW (2007) Estimation and inference in two-sage semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics136:31–64.
24.
SimarLWilsonPW (2011) Two-stage DEA: Caveat emptor. Journal of Productivity Analysis36:205–218.
25.
StaatM (2001) The effect of sample size on the mean efficiency in DEA: comment. Journal of Productivity Analysis15:129–137.
26.
WilsonPW (2008) FEAR: a software package for frontier efficiency analysis with R. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences42(4):247–254.
27.
ZhangYBartelsR (1998) The effect of sample size on mean efficiency in DEA with an application to electricity distribution in Australia, Sweden and New Zealand. Journal of Productivity Analysis9:187–204.
