The present study uses primary data collected by the researchers on residential burglaries committed in the time-period of 1991–2021 to analyze the individual year frequency of obituary burglaries and patterns across time in relation to obituary burglaries. The goal is to assess the frequency of this form of burglary and the potential impact of increased web based publishing of obituaries on incidents of residential burglaries during funerary rites. Findings indicate that while this form of burglary is rare, it is a niche form of residential burglary committed by specialized burglars who utilize information available about funerals to specifically target the family of the deceased’s home or the vacant home of the deceased. Recommendations for protecting against this form of victimization are provided.
AcquistiA.TuckerC. (2022). Guns, privacy, and crime (No. w29940). National Bureau of Economic Research.
2.
ArgunU.DağlarM. (2016). Examination of routine activities theory by the property crime. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 1188–1198. https://doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v13i1.3665
3.
BendlerJ.RatkuA.NeumannD. (2014). Crime mapping through geo-spatial social media activity.
4.
BennettT.WrightR. (1984). Burglars on burglary: Prevention and the offender. Gower.
5.
BernascoW.JohnsonS. D.RuiterS. (2015). Learning where to offend: Effects of past on future burglary locations. Applied Geography, 60, 120-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.03.014.
6.
BernascoW.LuykxF. (2003). Effects of attractiveness, opportunity and accessibility to burglars on residential burglary rates of urban neighborhoods. Criminology, 41(3), 981–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb01011.x
7.
BottomsA. E. (2007). Place, space, crime, and disorder. In The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 4 (pp. 528–574).Oxford University Press.
8.
BreetzkeG. D.CohnE. G. (2013). Burglary in gated communities: An empirical analysis using routine activities theory. International Criminal Justice Review, 23(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567713476887
CardosoÉ. A. D. O.SilvaB. C. D. A. D.SantosJ. H. D.LotérioL. D. S.AccoroniA. G.SantosM. A. D. (2020). The effect of suppressing funeral rituals during the COVID-19 pandemic on bereaved families (28). Revista latino-americana de enfermagem.
12.
CoupeT.BlakeL. (2006). Daylight and darkness targeting strategies and the risks of being seen at residential burglaries. Criminology, 44(2), 431–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00054.x
13.
CromwellP. F.OlsonJ. N.Aunn Wester Avary (1991). Breaking and entering: An ethnographic analysis of burglary (8). Sage.
14.
CutlerD. M.GlaeserE. L. (2021). When innovation goes wrong: Technological regress and the opioid epidemic. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(4), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.4.171
15.
DonoghueB. (2017). Risks: Hacking, identity theft and burglary that are associated with students (aged 18-24) in sharing personal data through social media applications. [Doctoral dissertation, Cardiff Metropolitan University].
16.
FelsonM.JiangS.XuY. (2020). Routine activity effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on burglary in Detroit, March, 2020. Crime Science, 9(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-020-00120-x
17.
GatelyN.FlemingJ.McGintyN.ScottA. (2014). The‘oldest tricks in the book’don’t work! Reports of burglary by DUMA detainees in Western Australia. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, (489), 1-9.
HakimS.RengertG. F.ShachmuroveY. (2001). Target search of burglars: A revised economic model. Papers in Regional Science, 80(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00013617
20.
Hayslett-McCallK. L.QiuF.CurtinK. M.ChastainB.SchubertJ.CarverV. (2008). The simulation of the journey to residential burglary. In Artificial crime analysis systems: Using computer simulations and geographic information systems (pp. 281–299). IGI Global.
21.
HumeJ. (2000). Obituaries in American culture. University Press of Mississippi.
22.
KrögerJ. L.MiceliM.MüllerF. (2021). How data can Be used against people: A classification of personal data misuses. Available at SSRN 3887097.
LeinerB. M.CerfV. G.ClarkD. D.KahnR. E.KleinrockL.LynchD. C.PostelS.RobertsL. G.WolffS. (2009). A brief history of the Internet. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 39(5), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/1629607.1629613
25.
MaguireM.BennettT. (1982). Burglary in a dwelling: The offence, the offender and the victim. Heinemann.
26.
MeenaghanA.NeeC.Van GelderJ. L.OtteM.VernhamZ. (2018). Getting closer to the action: Using the virtual enactment method to understand burglary. Deviant Behavior, 39(4), 437–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1407104
27.
PollockW.JooH. J.LawtonB. (2010). Juvenile arrest rates for burglary: A routine activities approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 572–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.04.028
28.
RengertG. F.WasilchickJ. (1985). Suburban burglary: A time and a place for everything. CC Thomas.
29.
RepettoT. A. (1974). Residential crime, ballinger. Mass.
RobertsL. (2010). Police warn of burglary risk from social media sites. BBC News.
32.
RoseC. (2011). The security implications of ubiquitous social media. International Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS), 15(1), Article 1593. https://doi.org/10.19030/ijmis.v15i1.1593
RountreeP. W.LandK. C. (2000). The generalizability of multilevel models of burglary victimization: A cross-city comparison. Social Science Research, 29(2), 284–305. https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.2000.0670
35.
SieglerM. G. (2010, February 17). Please Rob me makes foursquare super useful for burglars. https://techcrunch.com/2010/02/17/please-rob-me-makes-foursquare-super-useful-for-burglars/#:∼:text=Location%2Dbased%20services%20are%20all,element%20to%20its%20mobile%20site.
36.
TseloniA.WittebroodK.FarrellG.PeaseK. (2004). Burglary victimization in England and Wales, the United States and The Netherlands: A cross-national comparative test of routine activities and lifestyle theories. British Journal of Criminology, 44(1), 66–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/44.1.66
U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (n.d.). BJS data report. The Bureau, 19871990.
39.
VandeviverC.NeutensT.van DaeleS.GeurtsD.Vander BekenT. (2015). A discrete spatial choice model of burglary target selection at the house-level. Applied Geography, 64(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.08.004
40.
WilcoxP.MadensenT. D.TillyerM. S. (2007). Guardianship in context: Implications for burglary victimization risk and prevention. Criminology, 45(4), 771-803. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00094.x.
41.
WinchesterS.JacksonH. (1982). Residential burglary: The limits of prevention (No. 74). HM Stationery Office.
42.
WrightR. T.DeckerS. H. (1996). Burglars on the job: Streetlife and residential break-ins. UPNE.
43.
YostJ. E. (2018). Physical crimes informed by publicly available identity information: Underreported risk or overhyped myth? (Doctoral dissertation).
