The current study was conducted to adapt the Grief and Meaning Reconstruction Inventory (GMRI) into Spanish and to establish its psychometric properties in a group of 202 mourners seeking treatment in Spain. A confirmatory factor analysis established that the Spanish GMRI yielded eight factors, displaying strong reliability and convergent validity, through the scale’s inverse correlation with the Inventory of Complicated Grief and various measures of psychological distress, explaining a 48% of the variance of the former measure. A network analysis suggested that sense-making could play a central role in meaning-making during bereavement.
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.
2.
BelletB. W.JonesP. J.NeimeyerR. A.McNallyR. J. (2018). Bereavement outcomes as causal systems: A network analysis of the co-occurrence of complicated grief and posttraumatic growth. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(6), 797–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618777454
3.
BringmannL. F.ElmerT.EpskampS.KrauseR. W.SchochD.WichersM.WigmanJ. T. W.SnippeE. (2019). What do centrality measures measure in psychological networks?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(8), 892–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000446
4.
BurkeL. A.ClarkK. A.AliK. S.GibsonB. W.SmigelskyM. A.NeimeyerR. A. (2015). Risk factors for anticipatory grief in family members of terminally ill Veterans receiving palliative care services. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care, 11(3-4), 244–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2015.1110071
5.
BurkeL. A.NeimeyerR. A.BottomleyJ. S.SmigelskyM. A. (2017). Prospective risk factors for intense grief in family members of veterans who died of terminal illness. Illness, Crisis & Loss, 27(3), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054137317699580
6.
ColemanR. A.NeimeyerR. A. (2010). Measuring meaning: Searching for and making sense of spousal loss in late life. Death Studies, 34(9), 804–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481181003761625
7.
CurrierJ. M.HollandJ. M.NeimeyerR. A. (2008). Making sense of loss: A content analysis of end-of-life practitioners’ therapeutic approaches. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 57(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.57.2.a
8.
CurrierJ. M.HollandJ. M.NeimeyerR. A. (2012). Prolonged grief symptoms and growth in the first 2 years of bereavement: Evidence for a nonlinear association. Traumatology, 18(4), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534765612438948
EpskampS.MarisG.WaldorpL. J.BorsboomD. (2018). Network psychometrics. In IrwingP.BoothT.HughesD. J. (Eds.), The wiley handbook of psychometric testing (Vol. 35, pp. 953–986). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489772.ch30
11.
GilliesJ.NeimeyerR. A. (2006). Loss, grief, and the search for significance: Toward a model of meaning reconstruction in bereavement. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 19(1), 31–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720530500311182
12.
GilliesJ.NeimeyerR. A.MilmanE. (2014). The meaning of loss codebook: Construction of a system for analyzing meanings made in bereavement. Death Studies, 38(1–5), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2013.829367
13.
GilliesJ. M.NeimeyerR. A.MilmanE. (2015). The grief and meaning reconstruction inventory (GMRI): Initial validation of a new measure. Death Studies, 39(1–5), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2014.907089
14.
HancockG. R.AnJ. (2020). A closed-form alternative for estimating ω reliability under unidimensionality. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2019.1656049
15.
HayesA. F.CouttsJ. J. (2020). Use omega rather than cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But… Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
16.
HerreroM. J.BlanchJ.PeriJ. M.PabloJ. dePintorL.BulbenaA. (2003). A validation study of the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) in a Spanish population. General Hospital Psychiatry, 25(4), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-8343(03)00043-4
17.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7CF7R
18.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
LichtenthalW. G.CurrierJ. M.NeimeyerR. A.KeeseeN. J. (2010). Sense and significance: A mixed methods examination of meaning-making following the loss of one’s child. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66(7), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20700
24.
Limonero GarcíaJ. T.Lacasta ReverteM.García GarcíaJ. A.Maté MéndezJ.PrigersonH. G. (2009). Adaptación al castellano del inventario de duelo complicado [Spanish adaptation of the complicated grief inventory]. Medicina Paliativa, 16(5), 291–297.
25.
MacKinnonC. J.MilmanE.SmithN. G.HenryM.BerishM.CopelandL. S.KörnerA.ChochinovH. M.CohenS. R. (2013). Means to meaning in cancer-related bereavement. The Counseling Psychologist, 41(2), 216–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012459969
26.
MilmanE.NeimeyerR. A.FitzpatrickM.MacKinnonC. J.MuisK. R.CohenS. R. (2019). Prolonged grief and the disruption of meaning: Establishing a mediation model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(6), 714–725. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000370
27.
MilmanE.NeimeyerR. A.FtizpatrickM.MacKinnonC. J.MuisK.R.CohenS. R. (2017). Prolonged grief symptomatology following violent loss: The mediating role of meaning. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 8(sup6), 1503522. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2018.1503522
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(4), 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8
30.
NeimeyerR. A. (2000). Meaning reconstruction and the experience of loss (1st ed.). American Psychological Association.
31.
NeimeyerR. A. (2011). Grief and bereavement in contemporary society: Bridging research and practice (The series in death, dying, and bereavement). In NeimeyerR. AMooreA (Eds.), Routledge.
32.
NeimeyerR. A. (2012). Techniques of grief therapy: Creative practices for counseling the bereaved (Series in death, dying, and bereavement). In NeimeyerR. A (Ed.), Routledge.
33.
NeimeyerR. A. (Ed), (2016). Techniques of grief therapy: Assessment and intervention. Routledge.
NeimeyerR. A. (Ed), (2022). New techniques of grief therapy: Bereavement and beyond. Routledge.
36.
NeimeyerR. A.KlassD.DennisM. R. (2014). Mourning, meaning and memory: Individual, communal and cultural narration of grief. In BatthyanyA.Russo-NetzerP. (Eds.), Meaning in existential and positive psychology (pp. 325–346). Springer.
37.
ParkC. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018301
38.
PrigersonH. G.BoelenP. A.XuJ.SmithK. V.MaciejewskiP. K. (2021). Validation of the new DSM-5-TR criteria for prolonged grief disorder and the pg-13-revised (pg-13-r) scale. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 20(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20823
39.
PrigersonH. G.MaciejewskiP. K.ReynoldsC. F.BierhalsA. J.NewsomJ. T.FasiczkaA.FrankE.DomanJ.MillerM. (1995). Inventory of complicated grief: A scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss. Psychiatry Research, 59(1–2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(95)02757-2
40.
QuintanaJ. M.PadiernaA.EstebanC.ArosteguiI.BilbaoA.RuizI. (2003). Evaluation of the psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 107(3), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00062.x
41.
RandoT. A. (1986). Loss and anticipatory grief. Lexington Books.
42.
R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing[computer software]. https://www.R-project.org/
43.
RichesG.DawsonP. (2000). An intimate loneliness: Supporting bereaved parents and siblings/Gordon Riches and Pam Dawson. Facing death. Open University Press.
44.
RobinaughD. J.LeBlancN. J.VuletichH. A.McNallyR. J. (2014). Network analysis of persistent complex bereavement disorder in conjugally bereaved adults. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123(3), 510–522. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000002
45.
RobinaughD. J.MillnerA. J.McNallyR. J. (2016). Identifying highly influential nodes in the complicated grief network. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(6), 747–757. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000181
46.
RStudio Team (2021). Rstudio: Integrated development for R[computer software]. RStudio, Inc. http://www.rstudio.com/
47.
ShearM. KWangY.SkritskayaN.DuanN.MauroC.GhesquiereA. (2014).Treatment of complicated grief in elderly persons: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;71(11):1287-95. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1242. PMID: 25250737; PMCID: PMC5705174.
48.
SunJ. (2005). Assessing goodness of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37(4), 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2005.11909764
49.
TedeschiR. G.CalhounL. G. (1996). The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02103658
50.
VanierA.OortF. J.McClimansL.OwN.GulekB. G.BöhnkeJ. R.SprangersM.SébilleV.MayoN. (2021). Response shift in patient-reported outcomes: Definition, theory, and a revised model. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02846-w
51.
WolfE. J.HarringtonK. M.ClarkS. L.MillerM. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
52.
World Health Organization (2018). International classification of diseases 11th revision (11th ed.). World Health Organization.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
