Factorial Validity,Reliability,Measurement Invariance and the Graded Response Model for the COVID-19 Anxiety Scale in a Sample of Ecuadorians

Abstract

The aims of the research are to evaluate the factorial validity, internal consistency, measurement invariance, discrimination, and difficulty of the Covid-19 Anxiety Scale (CAS) applied to a sample of Ecuadorian adults (N = 451). The study is based on an instrumental design with Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT) technics. The results confirmed the validity of the CAS single-factor structure, with measurement invariance across gender and high internal consistency. Additionally, all CAS items displayed adequate discrimination indexes and proper ordering of the difficulty thresholds. In a conclusion, the CAS is a valid measurement scale for Ecuadorian adults.

Keywords

anxiety Covid-19 discrimination difficulty reliability scale validity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmed

Faisal

R. A.

Sharker

Lee

S. A.

Jobe

M. C.

(2020). Adaptation of the Bangla version of the COVID-19 anxiety scale. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00357-2

Ahorsu

D. K.

Lin

C. Y.

Imani

Saffari

Griffiths

M. D.

Pakpour

A. H.

(2020). The fear of COVID-19 scale: Development and initial validation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20(3), 1537–1545, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8

Asparouhov

Muthén

(2014). Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(4), 495–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.919210

Ato

López

Benavente

(2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038–1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511

Bajema

K. L.

Dahl

R. M.

Prill

M. M.

Meites

Rodriguez-Barradas

M. C.

Marconi

V. C.

Beenhouwer

D. O.

Brown

S. T.

Holodniy

Lucero-Obusan

Rivera-Dominguez

Morones

R. G.

Whitmire

Goldin

E. B.

Evener

S. L.

Tremarelli

Tong

Hall

A. J.

Schrag

S. J.

Enteric

S. P.

(2021). Effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines against COVID-19–associated Hospitalization—five veterans affairs medical centers, United States, February 1–August 6, 2021. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 70(37), 1294–1299. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7037e3

Birnbaum

(1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In Lord

Novick

(Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Wesley.

Broche-Pérez

Fernández-Castillo

Fernández-Fleites

Jiménez-Puig

Vizcaíno-Escobar

Ferrer-Lozano

Martin-Gonzalez

(2020). Adaptation of the Cuban version of the coronavirus anxiety scale. Death Studies, 46(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1855610

Brown

T. A.

(2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications.

Byrne

(2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20(4), 872–882. https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/PST/article/view/8744

10.

Cain

M. K.

Zhang

Yuan

K. H.

(2017). Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis for measuring nonnormality: Prevalence, influence and estimation. Behavior Research Methods, 49(5), 1716–1735. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0814-1

11.

Caycho-Rodríguez

Barboza-Palomino

Ventura-León

Carbajal-León

Noe-Grijalva

Gallegos

Reyes-Bossio

Vivanco-Vidal

(2020). Traducción al español y validación de una medida breve de ansiedad por el COVID-19 en estudiantes de ciencias de la Salud. Ansiedad y Estrés, 26(2-3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anyes.2020.08.001

12.

Caycho-Rodríguez

Vilca

Carbajal-León

White

Vivanco-Vidal

Saroli-Araníbar

Pena-Calero

B. N.

Moreta-Herrera

(2021b). Coronavirus anxiety scale: New psychometric evidence for the Spanish version based on CFA and IRT models in a Peruvian sample. Death Studies, 46(5), 1090–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1865480

13.

Caycho-Rodríguez

Vilca

L. W.

Peña-Calero

B. N.

Barboza-Palomino

White

Reyes-Bossio

(2021a). Measurement of coronaphobia in older adults: Validation of the Spanish version of the coronavirus anxiety scale. Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología, 57(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regg.2021.09.001

14.

Chang

K. C.

Hou

W. L.

Pakpour

A. H.

Lin

C. Y.

Griffiths

M. D.

(2020). Psychometric testing of three COVID-19-related scales among people with mental illness. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00361-6

15.

Chen

J. H.

Tong

K. K.

E. W.

A. M.

(2021). Measuring COVID-19 related anxiety and obsession: Validation of the coronavirus anxiety scale and the obsession with COVID-19 scale in a probability Chinese sample. Journal of Affective Disorders, 295(1), 1131–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.104

16.

Choi

Lee

S. A.

(2020). Validation of the Korean version of the obsession with COVID-19 scale and the Coronavirus anxiety scale. Death Studies, 46(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1833383

17.

Cullen

Gulati

Kelly

B. D.

(2020). Mental health in the COVID-19 pandemic. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 113(5), 311–312. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaa110

18.

DeMars

(2010). Item response theory. Oxford University Press.

19.

DeVellis

(2006). Classical test theory. Medical Care, 44(11), S50–S59. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245426.10853.30

20.

Eidman

Arbizu

Marturet

(2021). Análisis Psicométrico de la Escala de Ansiedad por Coronavirus en Población Argentina. Interacciones, 2021, Article e192. https://doi.org/10.24016/2020.v7.192

21.

Evren

Dalbudak

Topcu

Kutlu

(2020). Measuring anxiety related to COVID-19: A Turkish validation study of the coronavirus anxiety scale. Death Studies, 46(5), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1774969

22.

Ferrando

P. J.

Anguiano-Carrasco

(2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 18–33. https://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/pdf/1793.pdf

23.

Hambleton

R. K.

van der Linden

W. J.

Wells

C. S.

(2010). IRT models for the analysis of polytomously scored data: Brief and selected history of model building advances. In: Nering

Ostini

(Eds.).

24.

Jonason

Zemojtel-Piotrowska

Piotrowski

Sedikides

Campbell

Gebauer

Maltby

Adamovic

Adams

B. G.

Kadiyono

A. L.

Atitsogbe

K. A.

Bundhoo

H. Y.

Balțatescu

Bilic

Brulin

J. G.

Chobthamkit

Del Carmen Dominguez

Dragova‐Koleva

El-Astal

Yahiiaev

(2020). Country-level correlates of the dark triad traits in 49 countries. Journal of Personality, 88(6), 1252–1267. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12569

25.

Karim

S. S.

Karim

Q. A.

(2021). Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant: A new chapter in the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet, 398(10317), 2126–2128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02758-6

26.

Lee

S. A.

(2020). Coronavirus anxiety scale: A brief mental health screener for COVID-19 related anxiety. Death Studies, 44(7), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1748481

27.

Lee

S. A.

(2020a). How much “Thinking” about COVID-19 is clinically dysfunctional? Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 87(1), 97–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.067

28.

C. H.

(2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s1342

29.

Lieven

(2021). Global validation of the coronavirus anxiety scale (CAS). Current Psychology, 2021, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02583-w

30.

Magano

Vidal

D. G.

Dinis

M. A.

Leite

Â.

Leite

(2021). Validation and psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS) and fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) and associations with travel, tourism and hospitality. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), Article 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020427

31.

Mardia

(1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and Kurtosis with applications measures of multivariate skewness and Kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.2307/2334770

32.

McDonald

R. P.

(1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

33.

Mohammadpour

Ghorbani

Moradi

Khaki

Foroughi

A. A.

Rezaei

M. R.

(2020). Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the coronavirus anxiety scale. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 26(3), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.32598/ijpcp.26.3482.1

34.

Mora-Magana

Lee

S. A.

Maldonado-Castellanos

Jimenez-Gutierrez

Mendez-Venegas

Maya-del Moral

Rosas-Munive

M. D.

Mathis

A. A.

Jobe

M. C.

(2020). Coronaphobia among healthcare professionals in Mexico: A psychometric analysis . Death Studies, 1(2), 280–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1808762

35.

Moreta-Herrera

López-Calle

Caycho-Rodríguez

Cabezas Guerra

Gallegos

Cervigni

Calandra

(2021). Is it possible to find a bifactor structure in the fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19S)? Psychometric evidence in an Ecuadorian sample. Death Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2021.1914240

36.

Moreta-Herrera

Mayorga-Lascano

Larzabal-Fernandez

Vaca-Quintana

(2020). Factor analysis, reliability and validity of a measurement model for the intent of alcohol consumption among Ecuadorian teenagers. Health and Adictions/Salud y Drogas, 20(1), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.21134/haaj.v20i1.489

37.

Mueller

R. O.

Hancock

G. R.

(2018). Structural equation modeling the reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences. In Hancock

Stapleton

Mueller

, (Eds.). The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 445–456). Routledge.

38.

Padovan-Neto

F. E.

Lee

S. A.

Guimarães

R. P.

Godoy

L. D.

Costa

H. B.

Zerbini

F. L.

Fukusima

S. S.

(2021). Brazilian Adaptation of the coronavirus anxiety scale: A psychometric investigation of a measure of coronaphobia. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 2021, 0030222821991325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222821991325

39.

Peteet

J. R.

(2020). COVID-19 anxiety. Journal of Religion and Health, 59(5), 2203–2204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-020-01041-4

40.

Rasch

(1960). Probabilistic models for Some Intelligence and Attainment tests. The Danish Institute for Educational Research.

41.

R Core Team . (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

42.

Rodas

J. A.

Jara-Rizzo

M. F.

Greene

C. M.

Moreta-Herrera

Oleas

(2021). Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and psychological distress during lockdown due to COVID-19. International Journal of Psychology, 57(3), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12818

43.

Samejima

(1997). Graded response model. In Van der Linden

Hambleton

(Eds.). Springer.

44.

Schafer

K. M.

Lieberman

Sever

A. C.

Joiner

(2022). Prevalence rates of anxiety, depressive, and eating pathology symptoms between the pre-and peri-COVID-19 eras: A meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 298(Part A), 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.115

45.

Serpas

D. G.

Ignacio

D. A.

(2021). Psychometric properties of the coronavirus anxiety scale in a US college sample. Death Studies, 2021, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2021.1975178

46.

Toland

M. D.

(2014). Practical guide to conducting an item response theory analysis. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(1), 120–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431613511332

47.

Usher

Durkin

Bhullar

(2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and mental health impacts. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 29(3), 315–318, https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12726

48.

Vinaccia

Bahamón

M. J.

Trejos-Herrera

A. M.

Lee

S. A.

Quiceno

J. M.

Gómez

C. A.

Pelaez

E. C.

(2021). Validating the coronavirus anxiety scale in a Colombian sample. Death Studies, (online first), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2021.1944401

49.

Wolf

E. J.

Harrington

K. M.

Clark

S. L.

Miller

M. W.

(2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237

50.

Zumba-Tello

Moreta-Herrera

(2022). Afectividad, Regulación Emocional, Estrés y Salud Mental en adolescentes del Ecuador en tiempos de pandemia. Revista de Psicología de la Salud UHM, 10(1), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.21134/pssa.v10i1.801