This study assessed death anxiety (Death Anxiety Questionnaire, DAQ) and psychophysical- (psychological and physical) symptom experience following cadaveric dissection among the Silent Mentor Program (SMP) participants before thawing (T1), after the suturing, dressing and coffining session (T2), and one month post-program (T3). There was a significant decline in the total DAQ score comparing T1 and T2 (t = 7.69, p < 0.001) and T2 and T3 (t = 5.00, p < 0.001) and T1 and T3 (t = 10.80, p < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in total psychological-symptom score comparing T1 and T2 (t = 4.92, p < 0.001) and between T1 and T3 (t = 4.85, p < 0.001). However, for the physical-symptom experience, a significant increase in the physical-symptom score between T1 and T2 (t = –3.25, p = 0.001) was reported but the scores reduced significantly one month after the program (T2–T3; t = 4.12, p < 0.001). The mentoring concept of the SMP program has beneficial effects on improving attitude towards death and psychophysical-symptom experience associated with cadaver dissection.
AgnihotriG.SagooM. G. (2010). Reactions of first year Indian medical students to the dissection hall experience. NJIRM, 1(4), 4–9.
2.
AsadpourM.SabzevariL.EkramifarA.BidakiR. (2016). The attitude of medical students toward death: A cross-sectional study in Rafsanjan. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 22(3), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.185084
BatiA. H.OzerM. A.GovsaF.PinarY. (2013). Anxiety of first cadaver demonstration in medical, dentistry and pharmacy faculty students. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy : Sra, 35(5), 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1075-7
5.
ChiaT. I.OyeniranO. I.AjagbeA. O.OnigbindeO. A.OraebosiM. I. (2020). The symptoms and stress experienced by medical students in anatomy dissection halls. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 15(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.01.001
6.
ChiouR. J.TsaiP. F.HanD. Y. (2017). Effects of a “silent mentor” initiation ceremony and dissection on medical students’ humanity and learning. BMC Research Notes, 10(1), 483–487. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2809-0
7.
ConteH. R.WeinerM. B.PlutchikR. (1982). Measuring death anxiety: Conceptual, psychometric, and factor-analytic aspects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(4), 775–785. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.43.4.775
8.
CurfmanS. E.AustinG. P.NicholasJ. S. (2018). Post-traumatic stress and academic performance among entry-level doctoral physical therapy students in a human anatomy cadaver dissection course. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 16(3), 1.
9.
DickinsonG. E.TournierR. E.StillB. J. (1999). Twenty years beyond medical school: Physicians' attitudes toward death and terminally ill patients. Archives of Internal Medicine, 159(15), 1741–1744. doi:10.1001/archinte.159.15.1741
10.
DurandR. P.DickinsonG. E.SumnerE. D.LancasterC. J. (1990). Family physicians' attitudes toward death and the terminally-ill patient. Family Practice Research Journal,
11.
EvansE. J.FitzgibbonG. H. (1992). The dissecting room: Reactions of first year medical students. Clinical Anatomy, 5(4), 311–320.
12.
FinkelsteinP.MathersL. H. (1990). Post‐traumatic stress among medical students in the anatomy dissection laboratory. Clinical Anatomy, 3(3), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.980030308
13.
GetachewD. (2014). Reaction of medical students to experiences in dissection room. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, 24(4), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v24i4.9
14.
GreeneS. J.RosenL. (2021). Tracking medical student emotionality in relation to whole body dissection and donation. Clinical Anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 34(1), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23676
15.
GurdoganE. P.KınıcıE.AksoyB. (2019). The relationship between death anxiety and attitudes toward the care of dying patient in nursing students. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 24(7), 843–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2019.1576914.
16.
HancockD.WilliamsM.TaylorA. (1998). Psychological impact of cadavers and prosections on physiotherapy and occupational therapy students. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 44(4), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60384-6.
17.
HongM. K.ChuT. Y.DingD. C. (2017). How the silent mentor program improves our surgical level and safety and nourishes our spiritual life. Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy, 6(3), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gmit.2016.12.003
18.
KhanH. M.MirzaT. M. (2013). Physical and psychological effects of cadaveric dissection on undergraduate medical students. J Pak Med Assoc, 63(7), 831–834.
19.
LalitM.MahajanA.AroraA. K.PiplaniS. (2018). Attitude and response of first-year medical students toward cadaver, dissection, and subject of anatomy: A qualitative study. Amei's Current Trends in Diagnosis & Treatment, 2(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10055-0053
20.
Romo BarrientosC.José Criado-ÁlvarezJ.González-GonzálezJ.Ubeda-BañonI.Saiz-SanchezD.Flores-CuadradoA.Luis Martín-ContyJ.ViñuelaA.Martinez-MarcosA.Mohedano-MorianoA. (2019). Anxiety among medical students when faced with the practice of anatomical dissection. Anatomical Sciences Education, 12(3), 300–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1835
21.
RussaA. D.MligilicheN. L. (2014). Inspiring tanzanian medical students into the profession: Appraisal of cadaveric dissection stress and coping strategies. Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology = Archivio Italiano di Anatomia ed Embriologia, 119(3), 268–276.
22.
SantibañezS.BoudreauxD.TsengG. F.KonkelK. (2016). The tzu chi silent mentor program: Application of buddhist ethics to teach student physicians empathy, compassion, and self-sacrifice. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(5), 1483–1494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0110-x
23.
SawA. (2018). A new approach to body donation for medical education: The silent mentor programme. Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal, 12(2), 68–72. https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1807.015
24.
ZubairA.WaheedS.ShujaF. (2021). Psychological impact of cadaveric dissection on first-year medical students. The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 51(2), 173–176.https://doi.org/10.4997/JRCPE.2021.219
