This article reviews the concept of postmortem identity, noting its relationships to other concepts such as relational trauma. Identity is a very fluid concept that can change even after an individual's death as new information becomes available or even as social values change. Such modifications of postmortem identity can affect the course of bereavement-complication reactions to loss.
BishopH.RiehmanF. (1974) The situational context of deviance: “The other side” of labeling theory, Montreal, Canada: American Sociological Association.
2.
Brubaker, J. R., & Hayes, G. R. (2011). “We will never forget you [online]”: An empirical investigation of post-mortem MySpace com. In Proceedings of ACM CSCW11 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 123–132). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958843.
3.
Doka, K. J. (Ed.). (2002). Disenfranchised grief: New directions, challenges, and strategies for practice. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
4.
JackmanN.O’TooleR.GeisG. (1963) The self-image of the prostitute. The Sociological Quarterly4: 150–157.
5.
MeadG. H. (1962) Mind, self and society, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
6.
MeltzerB. (1972) The Chicago and Iowa schools of symbolic interactionism. In: ManisJ.MeltzerB. (eds) Symbolic interaction: A reader in social psychology, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 43–57.
7.
MelvinM. (1969) Behavior rhythms in mental hospitals. American Journal of Sociology74: 650–664.
8.
RubinS.MalkinsonR.WitztumE. (2012) Working with the bereaved: Multiple lenses on loss, New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
Schwartz, M., & Styker, S. (1970). Deviance, Selves, and Others. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, Sykes.
10.
StraussA. (1997) Mirrors and masks: The search for identity, Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
11.
StraussA.SchatzmanL.EhrlichD.BucherR.SabshinM. (1963) The hospital and its negotiated order. In: FieldsonG. (ed.) The hospital in modern society, Glencoe, IL: Free Press, pp. 147–169.
12.
StrykerS. (1968) Identity salience and role performance: Relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and Family30: 558–564.
13.
StrykerS.SchwartzM. (1970) Deviance, self and others, Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
14.
SullivanH. S. (1953) The interpersonal theory of psychiatry, New York, NY: WW Norton.
15.
TeigheJ. E. (1982) Death work and the construction on[of?] post-mortem identity. NRIC National Reporter5: 516–518.
16.
WarnerL. W. (1960) Social class in America, New York, NY: Johanna Cotler Books.
