This paper uses plant-level estimates of total factor productivity covering 40 years to examine what role, if any, productivity has played in the decline of output share and employment in British manufacturing. The results show that TFP growth in British manufacturing was negative between 1973 and 1982, marginally positive between 1982 and 1994 and strongly positive between 1994 and 2012. Poor TFP performance therefore does not appear to be the main cause of the decline of UK manufacturing. Productivity growth decompositions show that, in the latter period, the largest contributions to TFP growth come from foreign-owned plants, industries that are heavily involved in trade, and industries with high levels of intangible assets.
AckerbergD., CavesK. and FrazerG. (2015), ‘Identification properties of recent production function estimators’, Econometrica, 83(6), pp. 2411–51.
2.
AmitiM. and WeiS.-J. (2009), ‘Service offshoring and productivity: evidence from the US’, World Economy, 32(2), pp. 203–20.
3.
BarneyJ. (1991), ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 99–120.
4.
BartelsmanE. and DhrymesP. (1998), ‘Productivity dynamics: US manufacturing plants, 1972–1986’, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 9(1), pp. 5–34.
5.
BaumolW. (1984), ‘On productivity growth in the long run’, Atlantic Economic Journal, 12(3), pp. 4–10.
6.
BIS (2010), ‘Manufacturing in the UK: an economic analysis of the sector’, BIS Occasional Paper 10A, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
7.
BIS (2012a), ‘The impact of investment in intangible assets on productivity’, BIS Research Paper 75, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
8.
BIS (2012b), ‘Industrial strategy: UK sector analysis’, BIS Economics Paper 18, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
9.
BosworthD., JonesP. and WilsonR. (2008), ‘The transition to a highly qualified workforce’, Education Economics, 16(2), pp. 127–47.
10.
BrunoM. (1978), ‘Duality, intermediate inputs and value-added’, in FussM. and McFaddenD. (eds), Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, pp. 4–16, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
11.
BrysonA. and ForthJ. (2010), ‘Trade union membership and influence 1999–2009’, CEP Discussion Paper 1003, Centre for Economic Performance.
12.
BrysonA., ForthJ. and KirbyS. (2005), ‘High-involvement management practices, trade union representation and workplace performance in Britain’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 52(3), pp. 451–91.
13.
CameronG. (2003), ‘Why did UK manufacturing productivity growth slow down in the 1970s and speed up in the 1980s?’, Economica, 70(277), pp. 121–41.
14.
CastellacciF. and LieC.M. (2015), ‘Do the effects of R&D tax credits vary across industries? A meta-regression analysis’, Research Policy, 44(4), pp. 819–32.
15.
CavesR. (1998), ‘Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms’, Journal of Economic Literature, 36(4), pp. 1947–82.
Dal BorgoM., GoodridgeP., HaskelJ. and PesoleA. (2013)., ‘Productivity and growth in UK industries: an intangible investment approach’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 75(6), pp. 806–34.
20.
DiewertW.E. (1978), ‘Hicks’ aggregation theorem and the existence of a real value-added function’, in FussM. and McFaddenD. (eds), Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, pp. 17–52, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
21.
DisneyR., HaskelJ. and HedenY. (2003), ‘Restructuring and productivity growth in UK manufacturing’, Economic Journal, 113(489), pp. 666–94.
22.
DoucouliagosC. and LarocheP. (2003), ‘What do unions do to productivity? A meta-analysis’, Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 42(4), pp. 650–91.
23.
FäreR. and PrimontD. (1995), Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
FelsteadA., GallieD., GreenF. and ZhouY. (2007), Skills at Work, 1986–2006, Oxford: ESRC Research Centre on Skills, Knowledge and Organizational Performance.
27.
FieldS. and FranklinM. (2013), Micro-data Perspectives on the UK Productivity Conundrum – An Update, Newport, Office for National Statistics, available at http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171766_329419.pdf.
28.
FosterL., HaltiwangerJ. and KrizanC.J. (2001), ‘Aggregate productivity growth: lessons from microeconomic evidence’, in HultenC., DeanE.R. and HarperM.J. (eds), New Developments in Productivity Analysis, pp. 303–72, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
GandhiA., NavarroS. and RiversD. (2012), ‘On the identification of production functions: how heterogenous is productivity’, Collegio Carlos Alberto Working Paper 288, Collegio Carlos Alberto.
30.
GennaioliN., La PortaR., Lopez-de-SilanesF. and ShleiferA. (2013), ‘Human capital and regional development’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1), pp. 105–64.
31.
GirmaS., GreenawayD. and WakelinK. (2001), ‘Who benefits from foreign direct investment in the UK?’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48(2), pp. 119–33.
32.
GorgH., HenryM. and StroblE. (2008), ‘Grant support and exporting activity’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(1), pp. 168–74.
GregoryM., ZissimosB. and GreenhalghC. (2001), ‘Jobs for the skilled: how technology, trade, and domestic demand changed the structure of UK employment, 1979–90’, Oxford Economic Papers, 53(1), pp. 20–46.
35.
GriffithR. (1999), ‘Using the ARD establishment level data to look at foreign ownership and productivity in the United Kingdom’, Economic Journal, 109(456), pp. F416–42.
36.
GriffithR., ReddingS. and SimpsonH. (2005), ‘The dynamics of establishment productivity: technology transfer and productivity dispersion’, IFS Working Paper, London, Institute for Fiscal Studies, available at http://www.princeton.edu/~reddings/papers/grs_v2_final.pdf.
37.
HarrisR. (1987), ‘The role of manufacturing in regional growth’, Regional Studies, 21(4), pp. 301–12.
38.
HarrisR. and DrinkwaterS. (2000), ‘UK plant and machinery capital stocks and plant closures’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 62(2), pp. 243–65.
39.
HarrisR. and MoffatJ. (2012), ‘Is productivity higher in British cities?’, Journal of Regional Science, 52(5), pp. 762–86.
40.
HarrisR. and MoffatJ. (2013a), ‘The direct contribution of FDI to productivity growth in Britain, 1997–2008’, The World Economy, 36(6), pp. 713–36.
41.
HarrisR. and MoffatJ. (2013b), ‘Intangible assets, absorbing knowledge and its impact on firm performance: theory, measurement and policy implications’, Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 8(3), pp. 346–61.
42.
HarrisR. and MoffatJ. (2015a), ‘The impact of exporting and importing goods and services on productivity in the UK’, The World Economy, 38(11), pp. 1781–94.
43.
HarrisR. and MoffatJ. (2015b), ‘Plant-level determinants of total factor productivity in Great Britain, 1997–2008’, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 44(1), pp. 1–20.
44.
HarrisR. and MoffatJ. (2016), ‘The UK productivity puzzle, 2008–2012: evidence using plant level estimates of total factor productivity’, Oxford Economic Papers, 69 (3). pp. 529–49.
45.
HarrisR. and RobinsonC. (2003), ‘Foreign ownership and productivity in the United Kingdom estimates for U.K. manufacturing using the ARD’, Review of Industrial Organization, 22(3), pp. 207–23.
46.
KaldorN. (1966), Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth in the United Kingdom, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
KogutB. and ZanderU. (1996), ‘What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning’, Organization Science, 7(5), pp. 502–18.
48.
KrugmanP. (1997), The Age of Diminished Expectations: US Economic Policy in the 1990s, 3rd edn., Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press.
49.
LevinsohnJ. and PetrinA. (2003), ‘Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables’, The Review of Economic Studies, 70, pp. 317–41.
50.
MadsenJ. (2013), ‘Human capital and the world technology frontier’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(4), pp. 676–92.
51.
MartinR. (2008), ‘Productivity dispersion, competition and productivity measurement’, CEP Discussion Paper 692, Centre for Economic Performance.
52.
MasonG., O'MahonyM. and RileyR. (2018), ‘What is holding back UK productivity? Lessons from decades of measurement’, National Institute Economic Review, 246(1), pp. R24–35.
53.
MelitzM. and PolanecS. (2015), ‘Dynamic Olley-Pakes productivity decomposition with entry and exit’, The RAND Journal of Economics, 46(2), pp. 362–75.
54.
MetcalfD. (2003), ‘Unions and productivity, financial performance and investment: international evidence’, in AddisonJ. and SchnabelC. (eds), International Handbook of Trade Unions, pp. 118–71, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
55.
MoffatJ. (2013), ‘Recent micro-economic trends in the manufacturing sector’, Future of Manufacturing EP23, Government Office for Science.
56.
OeschD. and Rodríguez MenésJ. (2011), ‘Upgrading or polarization? Occupational change in Britain, Germany, Spain and Switzerland, 1990–2008’, Socio-Economic Review, 9(3), pp. 503–31.
57.
OlleyG.S. and PakesA. (1996), ‘The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry’, Econometrica, 64(6), pp. 1263–97.
58.
O'DonnellC. (2016), ‘Using information about technologies, markets and firm behaviour to decompose a proper productivity index’, Journal of Econometrics, 190(2), pp. 328–40.
59.
O'MahonyM. (1998), Britain's Productivity Performance 1950–1996: An International Perspective, London: National Institute of Economics and Social Research.
60.
O'MahonyM. and de BoerW. (2002), ‘Britain's relative productivity performance: has anything changed?’, National Institute Economic Review, 179(1), pp. 38–43.
61.
O'MahonyM. and TimmerM. (2009), ‘Output, input and productivity measures at the industry level: the EU KLEMS Database’, Economic Journal, 119, pp. F374–403.
PengF. and KangL. (2013), ‘Labor market institutions and skill premiums: an empirical analysis on the UK, 1972–2002’, Journal of Economic Issues, 47(4), pp. 959–82.
64.
PenroseE. (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65.
PriceR. and BainG. (1983), ‘Union growth in Britain: retrospect and prospect’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 21(1), pp. 46–68.
66.
RestucciaD. and RogersonR. (2008), ‘Policy distortions and aggregate productivity with heterogeneous establishments’, Review of Economic Dynamics, 11(4), pp. 707–20.
67.
RileyR., Rincon-AznarA. and SamekL. (2018), ‘Below the aggregate: a sectoral account of the UK productivity puzzle’, ESCoE Discussion Paper 2018–06, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence.
SchwörerT. (2013), ‘Offshoring, domestic outsourcing and productivity: evidence for a number of European countries’, Review of World Economics, 149(1), pp. 131–49.
70.
SianesiB. and Van ReenenJ. (2003), ‘The returns to education: macroeconomics’, Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(2), pp. 157–200.
71.
SuditE. and FingerN. (1981), ‘Methodological issues in aggregate productivity analysis’, in DogramaciA. and AdamN. (eds), Aggregate and Industry-Level Productivity Analyses, pp. 7–30, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
72.
TeeceD. and PisanoG. (1998), ‘The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction’, in DosiG., TeeceD. and ChytryJ. (eds), Technology, Organization, and Competitiveness. Perspectives on Industrial and Corporate Change, pp. 193–213, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73.
Van ArkB., HaoJ., CorradoC. and HultenC. (2009), ‘Measuring intangible capital and its contribution to economic growth in Europe’, EIB Papers, 14(1), pp. 62–93.
74.
Van BiesebroeckJ., YuE. and ChenS. (2016), ‘The impact of trade promotion services on Canadian exporter performance’, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d'Economique, 48(4), pp. 1481–512.
75.
Van ReenenJ. (2013), ‘Productivity under the 1997–2010 Labour government’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 29(1), pp. 113–41.
76.
WagnerJ. (2012), ‘International trade and firm performance: a survey of empirical studies since 2006’, Review of World Economics, 148(2), pp. 235–67.
77.
WrightC. and BrownW. (2014), ‘From center stage to bit player: trade unions and the British Economy’, The Singapore Economic Review, 59(04), pp. 1450030–1450001–1450030–1450020.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
