The Institute is a world leader in macroeconomic modelling and forecasting. It has produced quarterly economic forecasts for around sixty years, supported by macroeconomic models. The aim of the original builders of macroeconomic models was to transform understanding of how economies worked and use that knowledge to improve economic policy. In the early years, when computers were rare, macroeconomic modelling was a new frontier and Institute economists were among the first to produce a working model of the UK economy. It is remarkable how quickly models were being used to produce forecasts, assess policy and influence the international macroeconomic research agenda. The models built at the Institute were mainstream in the sense that they followed the contents of standard macroeconomic textbooks, developed with the subject, and fitted the facts as they were known at the time. There were continual improvements in understanding as the subject developed in response to new ideas and developments in the global economy. This article celebrates the development of macroeconomic modelling at the Institute and the contribution it has made to public life.
AndertonR. and BarrellR. (1995), ‘The ERM and structural change in European labour markets: a study of 10 countries’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Band 131, Heft 1.
2.
ArmstrongA. and PortesJ. (2016), ‘The economic consequences of leaving the EU’, National Institute Economic Review, 236, May pp. 2–6.
3.
BarrellR. (2001), ‘Forecasting the world economy’, in HendryD.F. and EricssonN.R., Understanding Economic Forecasts, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 152–73.
4.
BarrellR., BeckerB., ByrneJ., GottschalkS., HurstI. and van WelsumD. (2004), ‘Macroeconomic policy in Europe: experiments with monetary responses and fiscal impulses’, Economic Modelling, 21, pp 877–931.
5.
BarrellR., ByrneJ. and DuryK. (2003), ‘The implications of diversity in consumption behaviour for the choice of monetary policy rules in Europe’, Economic Modelling, 20, pp. 275–99.
6.
BarrellR. and DavisP. (2007), ‘Financial liberalisation, consumption and wealth effects in 7 OECD countries’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, May, 54, pp. 254–67.
7.
BarrellR., DavisP., FicT., HollandD., KirbyS., and LiadzeI. (2009), ‘Optimal regulation of bank capital and liquidity: how to calibrate new international standards’, FSA Occasional Paper no. 38, October.
8.
BarrellR., DavisP., KarimD. and LiadzeI. (2010), ‘Bank regulation, property prices and early warning systems for banking crises in OECD countries’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 34, pp. 2255–64.
9.
BarrellR., DavisP. and PomerantzO. (2006), ‘Costs of financial instability, household-sector balance sheets and consumption’, Journal of Financial Stability, 2, 2, pp. 194–216.
10.
BarrellR. and DuryK. (2000a), ‘Choosing the regime: macroeconomic effects of UK entry into EMU’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 30 (4).
11.
BarrellR. and DuryK. (2000b), ‘An evaluation of monetary targeting regimes’, National Institute Economic Review, 174, October.
12.
BarrellR., DuryK. and HurstI. (2003), ‘International monetary policy co-ordination: an evaluation using a large econometric model’, Economic Modelling, 20, pp. 507–27.
13.
BarrellR., FicT. and HollandD. (2009), ‘Evaluating policy reactions to the financial crisis’, National Institute Economic Review, 207, January, pp. 39–42.
14.
BarrellR., FicT. and LiadzeI. (2009), ‘Fiscal policy effectiveness in the banking crisis’, National Institute Economic Review, 207, January, pp. 43–50.
15.
BarrellR., GottschalkS., KirbyS. and OrazganiA. (2009), ‘Projections of migration inflows under alternative scenarios for the World Economy’, Department of Communities and Local Government economics paper No. 3.
16.
BarrellR., HallS.G. and HurstA.I. (2006), ‘Evaluating policy feedback rules using the joint density function of a stochastic model’, Economics Letters, 93 (1), October, pp. 1–5.
17.
BarrellR. and HollandD. (2010), ‘Fiscal and financial responses to the economic downturn’, National Institute Economic Review, 211, January, pp. R51–62.
18.
BarrellR., HurstI. and MitchellJ. (2007), ‘Uncertainty bounds for cyclically adjusted budget balances’, in LarchM. and MartinsL.N. (eds), Fiscal Indicators, European Commission, Brussels, pp. 187–206.
19.
BarrellR., KirbyS. and OrazganiA. (2011), ‘The macroeconomic impact from extending working lives’, Department for Work and Pensions Economics Paper no. 95.
20.
BarrellR. and PainN. (1997), ‘Foreign direct investment, technological change, and economic growth within Europe’, Economic Journal, 107, pp. 1770–6.
21.
BarrellR. and PinaA. (2004), ‘How important are automatic stabilisers in Europe?’, Economic Modelling, 21, I, pp. 1–35.
22.
BarrellR., RileyR. and FitzgeraldJ. (2010), ‘EU enlargement and migration: assessing the macroeconomic impacts’, Journal of Common Market Studies, March.
23.
BarrellR. and SeftonJ. (1997), ‘Fiscal policy and the Maastricht solvency criteria’, Manchester School, June, 65(3) pp. 259–79.
24.
BarrellR. and WealeR. (2009), ‘The economics of a reduction in VAT’, Fiscal Studies, 30, 1, pp. 17–30.
25.
BarrellR. and WealeR. (2010), ‘Fiscal policy, fairness between generations, and national saving’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26(1) pp. 87–116.
26.
BlakeA. (1996), ‘Forecast error bounds by stochastic simulation’, National Institute Economic Review, 156, pp. 72–9.
27.
BlakeA. and WestawayP. (1994), ‘Targeting inflation with nominal interest rates’, NIESR WP No. 70.
28.
BlakeA. and WestawayP. (1996), ‘Credibility and the effectiveness of inflation targeting regimes’, Manchester School, LXIV, pp. 28–50.
29.
BlanchardO. (2018), ‘On the future of macroeconomic models’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 34 (1–2), pp. 43–54.
30.
BrittonA. (1983), Employment, Output and Inflation: the National Institute Model of the British Economy, Heinemann.
31.
CarrerasO., DavisP., HurstI., LiadzeI., PiggottR. and WarrenJ. (2018), ‘Implementing macroprudential policy in NiGEM’, NIESR Discussion Paper No. 490.
32.
ChadhaJ. (2017), ‘Why forecast?’, National Institute Economic Review, 239, F4–9.
33.
EbellM., HurstI. and WarrenJ. (2016), ‘Modelling the long-run economic impact of leaving the European Union’, Economic Modelling, 59, pp. 196–209.
34.
FuhrerJ. and MooreG. (1995), ‘Inflation persistence’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, pp. 197–230.
35.
HantzscheA., LoprestoM. and YoungG. (2018), ‘Using NiGEM in uncertain times: introduction and overview of NiGEM’, National Institute Economic Review, 244, R1–14.
36.
JonesK. (1998), Sixty Years of Economic Research: A Brief History of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research 1938–1998, NIESR Occasional Paper No. 52.
37.
KirbyS., ParamaguruK. and WarrenJ. (2015), ‘The accuracy of NIESR's GDP growth forecasts’, National Institute Economic Review, 232, F41–47.
38.
MitchellJ. (2005), ‘The National Institute density forecasts of inflation’, National Institute Economic Review, July.
39.
PainN., WealeM. and YoungG. (1997), ‘Britain's fiscal problems’, Economic Journal, 107(443), July, pp. 1142–56.
40.
PainN. and YoungG. (2004), ‘The macroeconomic impact of UK withdrawal from the EU’, Economic Modelling, 21(3), pp. 387–408.
41.
RileyR. and YoungG. (2007), ‘Skill heterogeneity and equilibrium unemployment’, Oxford Economic Papers, 59(4), pp. 702–25.
42.
SurreyM. (1971), The Analysis and Forecasting of the British Economy, NIESR Occasional Paper No. 25, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
TaylorJ.B. (1993), ‘Discretion versus policy rules in practice’, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, pp. 195–214.
44.
VinesD. and WillsS. (2018), ‘Rebuilding macroeconomic theory’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 34, 1–2.
45.
WealeM. (1998), ‘Foreword’, in Jones (1998).
46.
WealeM., BlakeA., ChristodoulakisN., MeadeJ. and VinesD. (1989), Macroeconomic Policy: Inflation, Wealth and the Exchange Rate, Unwin Hyman.
47.
WestawayP. (1995), ‘The role of macroeconomic models in the policy design process’, National Institute Economic Review, February.
48.
WorswickD. (1971), ‘Introduction’ in Surrey (1971).
