Housing Policy and the Changing Tenure Mix

Abstract

The paper discusses the many reasons why housing policy can appear to be both incoherent and ineffective - with too many Departments involved each with different objectives and a plethora of policies pulling in different directions. Drawing on earlier research findings the paper discusses three examples which have impacted on tenure mix – the growth in the private rented sector where policy initiatives – except for unintended side effects – have been limited and market and macroeconomic pressures have dominated; a range of tax anomalies which provide inconsistent incentives and generate considerable costs to the economy; and the impact of specific policies which concentrate on supporting owner-occupation through new build initiatives. The paper concludes by asking whether housing policy is inherently unable to withstand the pressures placed on it by both politics and macroeconomic realities.

Keywords

housing policy private rented sector housing taxation new build owner-occupation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bovaird

, Harloe

and Whitehead

C.M.E.

(1985), ‘Private rented housing: its current role’, Journal of Social Policy, (14), pp. 1–23.

British Property Federation (2017), Unlocking Benefits and Potential of Build-to-Rent, London: BPF.

Department of Communities and Local Government (2007), Homes for the future: More Affordable, More Sustainable, Cm. 7191, London: HMSO.

Department of Communities and Local Government (2017), Fixing our Broken Housing Market, Cm. 9352, London: HMSO.

Department of the Environment (1977), The Housing Policy Review, Cmnd 6851, London: HMSO.

DETR (2000), Quality and Choice, a Decent Home for All, London: DETR.

Finlay

, Ipsos

Mori

, Williams

and Whitehead

(2016), Evaluation of the Help to Buy Equity Loan Scheme, London: Department of Communites and Local Government.

Henry

, Harmer

, Piggott

, Ridout

and Smith

(2010), Australia's Future Tax System, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.

HM Government (2011), Laying the Foundations, A Housing Strategy for England, London: HM Government.

10.

Ipsos Mori (2018), Ipsos Mori Issues Index, March, available at https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2018-04/issues_index_march18_v1_internal_use_only.pdf.

11.

Letwin

(2018), Independent Review of Build Out : draft analysis, London: MHCLG, available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-of-build-out-draft-analysis.

12.

Mirrlees

J.A.

et al. (2010), Reforming the Tax System for the 21st Century: The Mirrlees Review, Vol. 1, Adam

, Besley

, Blundell

, Bond

, Chote

, Gammie

, Johnson

, Myles

and Poterba

J.M.

, Dimensions of Tax Design, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

13.

Montague

(2012), Review of the Barriers to Institutional Investment in Private Rented Homes, London: Department of Communities and Local Government.

14.

Rugg

and Rhodes

(2008), The Private Rented Sector: its contribution and potential, York: Centre for Housing Policy.

15.

Scanlon

, Whitehead

C.M.E.

and Blanc

(2017), A Taxing Question: is Stamp Duty Land Tax Suffocating the English Housing Market? Epsom: Family Building Society.

16.

Scanlon

, Whitehead

C.M.E.

and Williams

(2016), Taking stock: understanding the effects of recent policy measures on the private rented sector and Buy-to-Let, London: LSE.

17.

Udagawa

, Scanlon

and Whitehead

(2018), The Future Size and Composition of the Private Rented Sector, an LSE London project for Shelter, London: LSE London.

18.

Whitehead

C.M.E.

and Kleinman

(1986), Private Rented Housing in the 1980s and 1990s, Cambridge: Granta Publications.

19.

Whitehead

C.M.E.

, Scanlon

, Monk

, Tang

, with Haffner

, Lunde

, Anderson

and Voigtländer

(2016), Understanding the Role of Private Renting: A Four Country Case Study, Copenhagen: Knowledge Centre for Housing Economics.

20.

Whitehead

and Williams

(2017), ‘Changes in the regulation and control of mortgage markets and access to owner-occupation among younger households’, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 196, Paris: OECD Publishing, available at https://doi.org/10.1787/e16ab00e-en.