In this paper we explore for the first time regional differences in the patterning of occupational social mobility in the UK. Drawing on data from Understanding Society (US), supported by the Labour Force Survey (LFS), we examine how rates of absolute and relative intergenerational occupational mobility vary across 19 regions of England, Scotland and Wales. Our findings somewhat problematise the dominant policy narrative on regional social mobility, which presents London as the national ‘engine-room’ of social mobility. In contrast, we find that those currently living in Inner London have experienced the lowest regional rate of absolute upward mobility, the highest regional rate of downward mobility, and a comparatively low rate of relative upward mobility into professional and managerial occupations. This stands in stark contrast to Merseyside and particularly Tyne and Wear where rates of both absolute and relative upward mobility are high, and downward mobility is low. We then examine this Inner London effect further, finding that it is driven in part by two dimensions of migration. First, among international migrants, we find strikingly low rates of upward mobility and high rates of downward mobility. Second, among domestic migrants, we find a striking overrepresentation of those from professional and managerial backgrounds. These privileged domestic migrants, our results indicate, are less likely to experience downward mobility than those from similar backgrounds elsewhere in the country. This may be partly explained by higher educational qualifications, but may also be indicative of a glass floor or opportunity hoarding.
AshleyL., DuberleyJ., SommerladH. and ScholariosD. (2015), ‘Non-educational barriers to the elite professions evaluation’, Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission.
2.
AtkinsonR. (2004), ‘Fortress UK? Gated communities, the spatial revolt of the elites and time-space trajectories of segregation’, Hous. Stud.19.
3.
BensonM. (2014), ‘Trajectories of middle-class belonging: the dynamics of place attachment and classed identities’, Urban Studies.
4.
BlandenJ., GoodmanA., GreggP. and MachinS. (2004, ‘Changes in intergenerational mobility in Britain’, in CorakM. (ed.), Generational Income Mobility in North America and Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BlandenJ., GreavesE., GreggP., MacmillanL. and SibietaL. (2015), ‘Understanding the improved performance of disadvantaged pupils in London’, CASE Working Paper 21 (http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/spcc/wp21.pdf).
6.
BlandenJ., GreggP. and MachinS. (2005), Intergenerational Mobility in Europe and North America, Centre for Economic Performance Report to the Sutton Trust.
7.
BloklandT. and SavageM. (2008), Networked Urbanism: Social Capital in the City, Aldershot: Ashgate.
8.
Boberg-FazlicN. and SharpP. (2013), North and south: social mobility and welfare spending in preindustrial England, European Historical Economics Society (EHES) Working Paper No. 0037.
9.
BukodiE. and GoldthorpeJ.H.G. (2014), ‘The mobility problem in Britain: new findings from the analysis of birth cohort data: The mobility problem in Britain’, British Journal of Sociology, 66.
10.
BurrowsR. and GaneN. (2006), ‘Geodemographics, software and class’, Sociology, 40, pp. 793–812.
11.
ButlerT. (1997), Gentrification and the Middle-classes, Aldershot and Brookfield, Vermont: Ashgate.
12.
CampbellB.M.S. (2004), ‘North-South dichotomies, 1066-1550’, in BakerR.H. and BillingeM. (eds), Geographies of England - The North–South Divide, Material and Imagined, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
ChampionT., CoombesM. and GordonI. (2014), ‘How far do England's second-order cities emulate London as human-capital ‘escalators’’, Population, Space and Place, 20, pp. 421–33.
14.
ChettyR., HendrenN. and KatzL. (2016), ‘The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: new evidence from the moving to opportunity experiment, American Economic Review, 106 (4), pp. 855–902.
15.
ChettyR., HendrenN., KlineP. and SaezE. (2014), ‘Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, pp. 1553–623.
16.
CrawfordC., GreggP., MacmillanL., VignolesA., and WynessG. (2016), ‘Higher education, career opportunities and intergenerational inequality’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 32 (4), pp. 553–75.
17.
CunninghamN. and SavageM. (2015), ‘The secret garden? Elite metropolitan geographies in the contemporary UK’, Sociology Review, 63, pp. 321–48.
18.
FieldingA.J. (1992), ‘Migration and social mobility: South East England as an escalator region’, Regional Studies, 26, pp. 1–15.
19.
FieldingT. (1995), ‘Migration and middle-class formation in England and Wales’, in ButlerT. and SalvageM. (eds), Social Change and the Middle Classes, UCL Press.
20.
FindlayP.A., MasonC., HoustonD., McCollumD. and HarrisonR. (2009), ‘Escalators, elevators and travelators: the occupational mobility of migrants to South-East England’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35, pp. 861–79.
21.
FriedmanS. and LaurisonD. (forthcoming), ‘Mind the gap: financial London and regional class pay gap, British Journal of Sociology.
22.
FriedmanS., LaurisonD. and MacmillanL. (2017), ‘Social mobility, the class pay gap and intergenerational worklessness: new insights from the Labour Force Survey’, Social Mobility Commission.
GoldthorpeJ.H., LlewellynC. and PayneC. (1987), Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain, 2nd. ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press.
25.
GoldthorpeJ.H., LlewellynC. and PayneC. (2016), ‘Social class mobility in modern Britain: changing structure, constant process’, Journal of the British Academy, 4, pp. 89–111.
26.
GoldthorpeJ.H. and MillsC. (2008), ‘Trends in intergenerational class mobility in modern Britain: evidence from national surveys, 1972–2005’, National Institute Economic Review, 205, pp. 83–100.
GreggP., MacmillanL. and VittoriC. (2016), ‘Moving towards estimating sons’ lifetime intergenerational economic mobility', Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, DOI: 10.1111/obes.12146.
29.
HamnettC. (2003), Unequal City: London in the Global Arena., London and New York: Routledge.
30.
LaurisonD., and FriedmanS. (2016), ‘The class pay gap in Britain's higher professional and managerial occupations’, American Sociological Review, 81 (4), pp. 668–95, doi:10.1177/0003122416653602.
31.
MartinR.L. (2004), ‘The contemporary debate over the North-South divide: images and realities of regional inequality in late-twentieth-century Britain’, in BakerA.R.H. and BillingeM. (eds), Geographies of England – The North–South Divide, Material and Imagined, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ObolenskayaP., LuptonR. and ProvanB. (2016), ‘Pulling in the same direction? Economic and social outcomes in London and the North of England since the recession’, CASE Working Paper 23, http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/spcc/wp23.pdf.
34.
PayneG. (2017), The New Social Mobility: Why the Politicians Got it Wrong, Bristol: Policy
35.
SavageM. (1988), ‘The missing link? The relationship between spatial mobility and social mobility’, British Journal of Sociology, 39, pp. 554–77, doi:10.2307/590501.
36.
SavageM., DevineF., FriedmanS., CunninghamN., LaurisonD., MilesA., SneeH., MackenzieL. and WakelingP. (2015), Social Class in the 21st Century, London: Penguin.
