In this article, I evaluate the challenges related to the European Commission's output gap method of calculating the structural budgetary position, and assess its bottom-up alternatives in the EU's fiscal framework using the Finnish data for the years 1984–2014. The results reinforce the impression of the limited capacity of the output gap method to predict cyclical changes in real time and suggest that using the output gap method to steer fiscal policy tends to lead to a procyclical policy (stimulus in upturns and austerity in downturns). The bottom-up assessment methods that are based on discretionary fiscal policy measures appear to work better, and using them to steer fiscal policy could make the policy more effective.
BarriosS. and FargnoliR. (2010), ‘Discretionary measures and revenues in the run-up to the financial crisis’, European Commission Economic Papers 419.
2.
BeggI. (2014), ‘Fiscal policy transparency’ in ForssbaeckJ. and OxelheimL. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Economic and Institutional Transparency, Oxford: OUP
3.
BeggI. (2016), ‘Fiscal and other rules in EU economic governance: helpful, largely irrelevant or unenforceable?’, The Horizon 2020 programme FIRSTRUN project deliverable 6.4.
4.
BergmanU.M. and HutchisonM.M. (2015), ‘Economic stabilization in the post-crisis world: are fiscal rules the answer?’, Journal of International Money and Finance, 52, pp. 82–101.
5.
BergmanU.M., HutchisonM.M. and JensenS.E.H. (2016), ‘Promoting sustainable public finances in the European Union: the role of fiscal rules and government efficiency’, European Journal of Political Economy, 44, September, pp. 1–19.
6.
BesleyT. (2007), Principled Agents? The Political Economy of Good Government, Oxford University Press.
7.
BouisR., CournèdeB. and ChristensenA. (2012), ‘Implications of output gap uncertainty in times of crisis’, OECD Economics Department Working Papers 977.
8.
BrysonA. and ForthJ. (2015), ‘The UK's productivity puzzle’, NIESR Discussion Paper No. 448
9.
CarnotN. and de CastroF. (2015), ‘The discretionary fiscal effort: an assessment of fiscal policy and its output effect’, European Economy Economic Papers543.
10.
D'AuriaF., DenisC., HavikK., McMorrowK., PlanasC., RaciborskiR., RögerW. and RossiA. (2010), ‘The production function methodology for calculating potential growth rates and output gaps’, European Economy Economic Papers, 420.
11.
DalyM.C. and HobijnB. (2013), ‘Downward nominal wage rigidities bend the Phillips Curve’, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 8.
12.
EschenbachF. and SchuknechtL. (2002), ‘Fiscal balances and asset prices’, ECB Working Paper 141.
13.
European Commission (2006), ‘Public finances in EMU’, European Economy, 3|2006.
14.
European Commission (2013a), ‘Vade mecum on the Stability and Growth Pact’, European Economy, Occasional Papers, Issue 151.
15.
European Commission (2013b), ‘Report on public finances in EMU 2013’, European Economy, 4|2013.
16.
European Commission (2015), ‘Making the best use of the flexibility within the existing rules of the Stability and Growth Pact’, Communication From the Commission to the EP, the Council, the ECB, the ESC, the CR And the EIB.
17.
European Commission (2016), ‘Vade mecum on the Stability and Growth Pact, 2016 edition’, European Economy, Institutional Papers, Issue 021.
18.
FernaldJ.G. (2014), ‘Productivity and potential output before, during, and after the Great Recession’, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Papers 2014–15.
19.
FregertK. and PehkonenJ. (2009), ‘The crisis of the 1990s and unemployment in Finland and Sweden’, in JonungL., KianderJ. and VartiaP. (eds), The Great Financial Crisis in Finland and Sweden, Edward Elgar, pp. 158–83.
20.
GolinelliR.M.S. (2008), ‘The cyclical response of fiscal policies in the euro area. Why do results of empirical research differ so strongly?’, Banca d'Italia Working Papers 654.
21.
GorodnichenkoY., MendozaE.G. and TesarL.L. (2012), ‘The Finnish Great Depression: from Russia with love’, American Economic Review, 102, 4, pp. 1619–44.
22.
HallerbergM., StrauchR. and von HagenJ. (2007), ‘The design of fiscal rules and forms of governance in European Union countries’, European Journal of Political Economy, 23, 2, pp. 338–50.
23.
HavikK., Mc MorrowK., OrlandiF., PlanasC., RaciborskiR., RoegerW., RossiA., Thum-ThysenA. and VandermeulenV. (2014), ‘The production function methodology for calculating potential growth rates and output gaps’, European Economy, Economic Papers, 535.
24.
HetemäkiM. (2015), ‘Eurokriisin syyt ja euroalueen tulevaisuus [Reasons for the Euro crisis and the future of the Eurozone]’, Kansantaloudellinen aikakauskirja1.
25.
Hughes HallettA. and JensenS.E.H. (2012), ‘Fiscal governance in the Euro Area: institutions vs. rules’, Journal of European Public Policy, 19, 5.
26.
IFAC (2013), ‘Assessment of compliance with fiscal rules’, Irish Fiscal Advisory Council Fiscal Assessment Report 1.
27.
JalavaJ., PohjolaM., RipattiA. and VilmunenJ. (2006), ‘Biased technical change and capital–labour substitution in Finland, 1902–2003’, B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 6, 1.
28.
KeränenH. and KuusiT. (2016), ‘The EU's fiscal targets and their economic impact in Finland’, ETLA Working Papers No 33.
29.
KoenV. and van den NoordP. (2005), ‘Fiscal gimmickry in Europe: one-off measures and creative accounting’, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 417.
30.
KremerJ., Rodrigues BrazC., BrosensT., LangenusG., MomiglianoS. and SpolanderM. (2006), ‘A disaggregated framework for the analysis of structural developments in public finances’, ECB Working Paper 579.
31.
KrugmanP. (2013), ‘The pain in Spain is not hard to explain’, Blog post.
32.
KuusiT. (2013), ‘Structural change in the information era: perspectives from a multi-sector model of the Finnish Economy’, Dissertation for Aalto University School of Business.
33.
KuusiT. (2014, ‘Consolidation under the Europe's new fiscal rules: analyzing the implied minimum fiscal effort’, ETLA Working Papers No 23.
34.
KuusiT. (2015), ‘Alternatives for measuring structural budgetary position’, Publication series of the Government's analysis, assessment and research activities 5/2015.
35.
LaneP. (2012), ‘The European sovereign debt crisis’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26, pp. 49–68.
36.
LuomaA. and LuotoJ. (2010), ‘The aggregate production function of the Finnish economy in the twentieth century’, Southern Economic Journal, 76(3).
37.
MarcellinoM. and MussoA. (2010), ‘Real time estimates of the Euro Area output gap – reliability and forecasting performance’, ECB Working Papers 1157.
38.
MorrisR.S.L. (2007), ‘Structural balances and revenue windfalls – the role of asset prices revisited’, ECB Working Paper Series 737.
39.
MourreG., IsbasoiuG.-M., PaternosterD. and SaltoM. (2013), ‘The cyclically-adjusted budget balance used in the EU fiscal framework: an update.’ European Economy, Economic Papers, 478.
40.
MurrayJ. (2014), ‘Output gap measurement: judgement and uncertainty’, UK Office of Budget Responsibility Working paper 5.
41.
OrphanidesA. and van NordenS. (2002), ‘The unreliability of output gap estimates in real time’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4).
42.
PerottiR. (2011), ‘The “austerity myth”: gain without pain?’, BIS working papers no. 362.
43.
PlanasC. and RossiA. (2004), ‘Can inflation data improve real-time reliability of the output gap?”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19(1).
44.
PlanasC. and RossiA. (2014), Program GAP: Technical Description and User-manual, version 4.3, Joint Research Centre Technical Reports, European Commission.
45.
PohjolaM. (2011), ‘Kasvukauden tilinpäätös’ [Account of a period of growth],Kansantaloudellinen aikakauskirja3.
46.
PortesJ. and Wren-LewisS. (2015), ‘Issues in the design of fiscal policy rules’, Manchester School, University of Manchester, 83, pp. 56–86, 09.
47.
PriceR. and DangT.-T. (2011), ‘Adjusting fiscal balances for asset price cycles’, OECD Economics Department Working Papers 868.
48.
RünstlerG. (2002), ‘The information content of real-time output gap estimates: an application to the Euro Area’, ECB Working Paper 182.
49.
SacchiA. and SalottiS. (2015), ‘The impact of national fiscal rules on the stabilisation function of fiscal policy’, European Journal of Political Economy, 37, C, pp. 1–20.
50.
SchackletonR. (2013), ‘Total factor productivity growth in historical perspective’, Congressional Budget office Working Paper 2013–01.
51.
StockJ.H. and WatsonM.W. (2010), Modeling Inflation after the Crisis. Economic Policy Symposium, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
52.
SummersL.H. (2014), ‘Reflections on the “New Secular Stagnation Hypothesis”’, in TeulingsC. and BaldwinR. (eds), Secular Stagnation: Facts, Causes, and Cures, London: CEPR Press.
53.
TimmermannA. (2006), ‘An evaluation of the World Economic Outlook Forecasts’, IMF Working Paper 06/59.
54.
VirkolaT. (2013), ‘Rakenteellinen budjettitasapaino’ [Structural budget balance], Reports of the Research Institute of the Finnish Economy ETLA, no. 11.
55.
VirkolaT. (2014), ‘Real-time measures of output gap and fiscal policy stance’, Reports of the Research Institute of the Finnish Economy ETLA, no. 37.
56.
WolswijkG. (2007), ‘Short- and long-run elasticities. The case of the Netherlands’, ECB Working paper 763.
57.
Wren-LewisS. (2013), ‘How not to run fiscal policy: more lessons from the Eurozone’, Blog post (Mainly Macro, 17 October).
