Against the background of the increasing services content of many manufactured goods, the paper attempts to assess the role of (domestically and internationally) purchased service inputs for the relative export performance of countries in a particular manufacturing industry. It estimates an empirical model of export market shares for EU15 countries and twelve disaggregated manufacturing industries over the period 1995 to 2007. Whereas most traditional explanations are based on the influence of relative costs and technology-related variables, this paper emphasises the importance of services as a determinant of both product quality and the sectors' productivity. The service linkage variables are based on national input–output tables. The analysis finds a positive and highly significant impact of services on export market shares of manufactured goods. Distinguishing between domestically-sourced service inputs and imports results in a robust and highly significant impact of international service linkages, while the analysis finds no impact of domestic service linkages.
AmableB.VerspagenB., (1995), “The role of technology in market shares dynamics?’, Applied Economics, 27, 2, pp. 197–204.
2.
ArellanoM.BondS., (1991), “Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations?’, The Review of Economic Studies, 58, 2, pp. 277–97.
3.
ArellanoM.BoverO., (1995), “Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models?’, Journal of Econometrics, 68, 1, pp. 29–51.
BaldwinR.E.HarriganJ., (2007), ‘Zeros, quality and space: trade theory and trade evidence?’, NBER Working Paper, no. 13214.
6.
BlundellR.BondS., (1998), “Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models?’, Journal of Econometrics, 87, 1, pp. 115–43.
7.
BrooksE., (2006), “Why don't firms export more? Product quality and Colombian plants?’, Journal of Development Economics, 80, 1, pp. 160–78.
8.
CarlinW.GlynA.Van ReenenJ., (2001), “Export market performance of OECD countries: an empirical examination of the role of cost competitiveness?’, Economic Journal, 111, 468, pp. 128–62.
9.
CrozetM.HeadK.MayerT., (2009), ‘Quality sorting and trade: firm-level evidence for French wine?’, CEPR Discussion Paper, no. 7295.
10.
FagerbergJ., (1988), “International competitiveness?’, The Economic Journal, 98, 391, pp. 355–74.
11.
FagerbergJ., (1996), “Technology and competitiveness?’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12, 3, pp. 39–51.
12.
FalkM.JarocinskaE., (2010), ‘Linkages between services and manufacturing in EU countries?’, SERVICEGAP Review Paper, no. 1.
13.
FrancoisJ.WoerzJ., (2008), “Producer services, manufacturing linkages, and trade?’, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 8, 3, pp. 199–229.
14.
GreenhalgC.TaylorP.WilsonR., (1994), “Innovation and export volumes and prices: a disaggregated study?’, Oxford Economic Papers, 46, (January), pp. 102–34.
15.
GuerrieriP.MelicianiV., (2005), “Technology and international competitiveness: the interdependence between manufacturing and producer services?’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16, 4, pp. 489–502.
16.
HallakJ.C., (2006), “Product quality and the direction of trade?’, Journal of International Economics, 68, 1, pp. 238–65.
17.
HallakJ.C.SchottP.K., (2008), ‘Estimating cross-country differences in product quality?’, NBER Working Paper, no. 13807.
18.
HallakJ.C.SivadasanJ., (2008), ‘Productivity, quality and exporting behaviour under minimum quality requirements?’, MPRA Paper, no. 24146.
19.
JohnsonR.C., (2009), ‘Trade and prices with heterogeneous firms?’, mimeo.
20.
KrugmanP.R., (1983), “New theories of trade among industrial countries?’, The American Economic Review, 73, 2, pp. 343–7.
21.
KrugmanP.R., (1989), “Differences in income elasticities and trends in real exchange rates?’, European Economic Review, 33, 5, pp. 1031–54.
22.
LandesmannM.PfaffermayrM., (1997), “Technological competition and trade performance?’, Applied Economics, 29, 2, pp. 179–96.
23.
LaursenK.MelicianiV., (2000), “The importance of technology-based inter-sectoral linkages for market share dynamics?’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 136, 4, pp. 702–23.
24.
MagnierA.Toujas-BernateJ., (1994), “Technology and trade: empirical evidences for the major five industrialised countries?’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 130, 3, pp. 494–520.
25.
ManovaK.ZhangZ., (2009), ‘Export prices and heterogeneous firm models?’, NBER Working Paper, no. 15342.
26.
PenederM., (2001), Entrepreneurial Competition and Industrial Location, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
27.
PenederM., (2003), “Industry classifications. Aim, scope and techniques?’, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 3, 1–2, pp. 109–29.
28.
PenederM., (2005), “Creating industry classifications by statistical cluster analysis?’, Estudios de Economica Aplicada, 23, 2, pp. 451–63.
29.
RoodmanD.M., (2009), “A note on the theme of too many instruments?’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71, 1, pp. 135–58.
30.
SalimR.A.BlochH., (2009), “Business expenditures on R&D and trade performances in Australia: is there a link?’, Applied Economics, 41, 3, pp. 351–61.
31.
VerhoogenE., (2008), “Trade, quality upgrading and wage inequality in the Mexican manufacturing sector?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 2, pp. 489–530.
32.
WakelinK., (1998), “The role of innovation in bilateral OECD trade performance?’, Applied Economics, 30, 10, pp. 1335–46.
33.
WindmeijerF., (2005), “A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators?’, Journal of Econometrics, 126, 1, pp. 25–51.
34.
WindrumP.TomlinsonM., (1999), Knowledge-intensive Services and International Competitiveness: A Four Country Comparison, Research Memoranda, no. 023, Maastricht.
