An Analysis of EU Growth Trends,with A Particular Focus on Germany,France,Italy and the UK

Abstract

Since the mid- 1990s the growth performance of the Euro Area as a whole, despite some good individual country performances, has failed to keep pace with developments elsewhere in the EU (including the UK) and also in the US. This is especially the case for a number of the larger Euro Area economies. Despite an encouraging performance in terms of its labour input trends, there has been a significant, offsetting, deterioration in the Euro Area's underlying productivity performance. This is driven in large part, worryingly, by a marked downward shift in the growth rate of total factor productivity. Looking to the future, no significant recovery is predicted in the Euro Area's underlying economic performance over the period 2007-11. While the policy challenge is a serious one, the Euro Area as a whole can take comfort from the fact that the gains from a successful refocusing of its overall reform agenda could be considerable. For example, the progressive introduction of the five key measures linked to the Lisbon strategy (i.e. the services directive; reduction of the administrative burden; improving human capital; 3 per cent R&D target; and increases in the employment rate) could boost the Euro Area's economic and employment growth rates by more than 0.5 a percentage point annually for more than a decade. Such an outturn would give the Euro Area a potential growth rate of around 2.5 per cent, a rate of growth which in per capita terms would be broadly comparable to that of the US over the 2007-15 time period and, on the basis of current trends and policies, slightly better than that of the UK.

Keywords

GDP growth Productivity Employment Structural reform JEL Classifications: D24 JII J21 047

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmad, N. , Lequiller, F. , Marianna, P. , Pilat, D. , Schreyer, P. and Wölfl, A. (2004), `Comparing labour productivity growth in the OECD area: the role of measurement, Paper presented at the Banque de France, CEPII and IFO Workshop, Paris.

Blanchard, O. (2004), `The economic future of Europe', NBER Working Paper 10310.

Blanchard, O. J. and Katz, L. F. (1999), `Wage dynamics: reconciling theory and evidence', American Economic Review, 89, pp. 69-74.

Denis, C. , Mc Morrow, K. and Roeger, W. (2004), `An analysis of EU and US productivity developments', DG ECFIN Economic Papers, No 208.

Denis, C. , Mc Morrow, K. and Roeger, W. (2005), `The Lisbon Strategy and the EU's structural productivity problem', DG ECFIN Economic Papers, No 221.

Denis, C. , Grenouilleau, D. , Mc Morrow, K. and Roeger, W. (2006), `Calculating potential growth rates and output gaps - a revised production function approach', DG ECFIN Economic Papers, No 247.

Gali, J. (1999), `Technology, employment and the business cycle: do technology shocks explain aggregate fluctuations?', American Economic Review, 89, pp. 249-271.

Planas, C. , Roeger, W. and Rossi, A. (2007), `How much has labour taxation contributed to European structural unemployment?' Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control (forthcoming).

Sapir, A. et al. (2003) `An agenda for a growing Europe: making the EU system deliver', Report of an Independent High Level Group established on the initiative of the President of the European Commission.

10.

Triplett, J. and Bosworth, B. (2000), `Productivity in the services sector', in Stern, R. M. (ed.), Services in the International Economy, University of Michigan Press.

11.

Van Ark, B. , Inklaar, R. and McGuckian, R. (2003), `Changing gear productivity, ICT and service industries in Europe and the US', in Christensen, J. and Maskell, P. (eds), The Industrial Dynamics of the New Digital Economy, Edward Elgar, pp. 56-99.