This paper uses the IMF’s macroeconomic model MULTIMOD to examine the implications of the zero interest rate floor (ZIF) for the design of monetary policy in Japan. Similar to findings in other studies, targeting rates of inflation lower than 2.0 per cent significantly increases the likelihood of the ZIF becoming binding. Systematic monetary policy strategies that respond strongly to stabilise output and inflation, or that incorporate some explicit price-level component, can help to mitigate the implications of the ZIF.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ando, A.
(2000), ‘On the Japanese economy and Japanese national accounts’, NBER Working Paper No. 8033, December.
2.
Benhabib, J.
, Schmitt-Grohé, S. and Uribe, M. (2001), ‘Avoiding liquidity traps’, Working Paper.
3.
Buiter, W.H.
and Panigirtzoglou, N. (1999), ‘Liquidity traps: how to avoid them and how to escape them’, paper available at: http://www.nber.org./~wbuiter/public.htm.
4.
Clouse, J.
, Henderson, D., Orphanides, A., Small, D. and Tinsley, P. (2000), ‘Monetary policy when the nominal short-term interest rate is zero’, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Finance and Economic Discussion Series, No. 2000-51, November.
5.
Fuhrer, J.C.
and Madigan, B.F. (1997), ‘Monetary policy when interest rates are bounded at zero’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, November, pp. 573-585.
6.
Hunt, B.
and Laxton, D. (2001), ‘The zero interest rate floor (ZIF) and its implications for monetary policy in Japan’, IMF Working Paper 01/186.
7.
Isard, P.
(2000), ‘The role of MULTIMOD in the IMF’s policy analysis’, IMF Policy Discussion Paper No. 00/5.
8.
Khan, M.S.
and Senhadji, A.S. (2000), ‘Threshold effects in the relationship between inflation and growth’, IMF Working Paper No. 00/110, Washington, International Monetary Fund.
9.
Kieler, M.
(2003), ‘The ECB’s inflation objective’, IMF Working Paper No. 03/91, Washington, International Monetary Fund.
10.
Krugman, P.R.
(1998a), ‘Japan’s trap’, paper available at: http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www.
11.
Krugman, P.R.
(1998b), ‘Further notes on Japan’s liquidity trap’, paper available at: http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www.
12.
Laxton, D.
, Isard, P., Faruqee, H., Prasad, E. and Turtelboom, B. (1998), ‘MULTIMOD Mark III: the core dynamic and steadystate models’, IMF Occasional Paper No. 164.
13.
Laxton, D.
and Prasad, E. (1997), ‘Possible effects of European Monetary Union on Switzerland: a case study of policy dilemmas caused by low inflation and the nominal interest rate floor’, IMF Working Paper No. 97/23, and forthcoming in the Journal of Policy Modeling.
14.
Laxton, D.
and Prasad, E. (2000), ‘International spillovers of macroeconomic shocks: a quantitative exploration’, in Moser, T. and Schips, B. (eds), EMU, Financial Markets and the World Economy, Nowell, MA, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15.
Lebow, D.
(1993), ‘Monetary policy at near zero interest rates’, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Working Paper/Economic Activity Section, No. 136, July.
16.
McCallum, B.T.
(2001), ‘Inflation targeting and the liquidity trap’, NBER Working Paper No. 8225.
17.
Meredith, G.
(1999), ‘REPMOD: a smaller sibling for MULTIMOD’, IMF Working Paper No. 99/8, Washington, International Monetary Fund.
18.
Morck, R.
and Nakamura, M. (1999), ‘Japanese corporate governance and macroeconomic problems’, Harvard Institute of Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 1893, February.
19.
Orphanides, A.
and Wieland, V. (1999), ‘Efficient monetary policy design near price stability’, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Finance and Economic Discussion Series, No. 1999-67.
20.
Orphanides, A.
and Wieland, V. (1998), ‘Price stability and monetary policy effectiveness when nominal interest rates are bounded at zero’, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Finance and Economic Discussion Series, No. 1998-35.
21.
Ramaswamy, R.
and Rendu, C. (2000), ‘Japan’s stagnant nineties: a vector autoregression retrospective’, IMF Staff Papers, 47, 2, pp. 259-277.
22.
Reifschneider, D.L.
and Williams, J.C. (1999), ‘Three lessons for monetary policy in a low inflation era’, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Finance and Economic Discussion Series, No. 1999-44, August.
23.
Summers, L.H.
(1991), ‘How should long-term monetary policy be determined’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 23, 3, pp. 625-631.
24.
Svensson, L.
(2000), ‘The zero bound in an open economy: a foolproof way of escaping from a liquidity trap’, paper available at: http://www.iies.su.se/leosven/.
25.
Taylor, J.B.
(1993), ‘Discretion versus policy rules in practice’, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, No. 39, December, pp. 195-214.
26.
Uhlig, H.
(2000), ‘Should we be afraid of Friedman’s Rule?’, CEPR Working Paper No. 2548, pp. 1-53.
