There are differing views about the need for economic policy coordination in the EU and about the adequacy of the system that has evolved under EMU. This article examines the case for such policy coordination, then describes and assesses the current arrangements for both ‘hard’ coordination - epitomised by the much-maligned Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) - and the ‘soft’ forms of coordination that have evolved in the EU to complement formal rules. Although the system achieves more than is sometimes recognised, it is shown to have weaknesses. Options for reforming the SGP and other facets of the system are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agell J.
, Calmfors, L. and Jonsson, G. (1996), ‘Fiscal policy when monetary policy is tied to the mast’, European Economic Review, 40, pp.1413-1440.
2.
Aizenman, J.
(1994), ‘On the need for fiscal discipline in an union’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper W4656.
3.
Alesina, A.
, Blanchard, O., Gali, J., Giavazzi, F. and Uhlig, H. (2001) Defining a Macroeconomic Framework for the Euro Area: Monitoring the European Central Bank 3, London, CEPR.
4.
Allsopp, C.
and Vines, D. (1996), ‘Fiscal policy and EMU’, National Institute Economic Review, 158, pp. 91-107.
5.
Beetsma, R.
and Bovenberg, A. (1999), ‘The interaction of fiscal policy and monetary policy in a monetary union: balancing credibility and flexibility’, in Razin, A. and Sadka, E. (eds), The Economics of Globalization: Policy perspectives from public economics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 373-405.
6.
Beetsma, R.
and Uhlig, H. (1999), ‘An analysis of the Stability and Growth Pact’, Economic Journal, 109, 458, October, pp. 546-571.
7.
Begg, I.
(2002), ‘Running economic and monetary union: the challenges of policy co-ordination’, in Begg, I. (ed.), Europe Government and Money - Running EMU: The Challenges of Policy Coordination, London, The Federal Trust.
8.
Blinder, A.S.
(1999), ‘Central Bank credibility: why do we care? How do we build it?’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 7161.
9.
Boyer, R.
(2002), ‘Coordination of economic policies in Europe: from uncertainty to apprenticeship’, in Begg, I. (ed.), Europe Government and Money-Running EMU: the Challenges of Policy Coordination, London, The Federal Trust.
10.
Buiter, W.H.
, Corsetti, and Roubini, N. (1993), ‘Excessive deficits: sense and nonsense in the Treaty of Maastricht’, Economic Policy, 16, pp. 57-100.
11.
Buti, M.
, Roeger, W. and in’t Veld, J. (2001), ‘Policy conflicts and cooperation under a stability pact’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 39, 5, pp. 801-828.
12.
Buti, M.
and Giudice, G. (2002), ‘Maastricht’s fiscal rules at ten: an assessment’Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, pp. 823-848.
13.
Cini, M.
(2001), ‘The soft law approach: Commission rule-making in the EU’s state aid regime’, Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 2, pp. 192-207.
14.
Collignon, S.
(2001), ‘Economic policy coordination in EMU: institutional and political requirements’, Center for European Studies (CES), Harvard University, May.
15.
Commission Working Group 4a on Governance
(2001), Involving Experts in the Process of National Policy Convergence, June, Brussels.
16.
Cukierman, A.
(1992), Central Bank Strategy, Credibility and Independence: Theory and EvidenceCambridge, MA, The MIT Press
17.
Dyson, K.
(2000), The Politics of the Euro area: Stability or Breakdown?Oxford, Oxford University Press.
18.
Eichengreen, B.
and Wyplosz, C. (1998), ‘The Stability and Growth Pact: more than a minor nuisance?’, in Begg, D., von Hagen, J., Wyplosz, C. and Zimmerman, K.F. (eds), EMU: Prospects and Challenges for the Euro’, Economic Policy: A European Forum.
19.
European Commission
(2002a), ‘Coordination of economic policies in the EU: a presentation of the key features of the main procedures’, DG for Economic and Financial Affairs, Euro Papers No. 45.
20.
European Commission
(2002b), ‘Communication to the European Parliament and Council: strengthening the coordination of budgetary policy’, Brussels, 27.11.2002, COM (2002) 668 final.
21.
Fitoussi, J.-P.
and Creel, J. (2002), How to Reform the European Central Bank, London, Centre for European Reform.
22.
de Grauwe, P.
(2002), ‘Challenges for monetary policy in Euroland’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, pp. 693-718.
23.
Hodson, D.
and Maher, I. (2002), ‘EMU: balancing credibility and legitimacy in the policy mix’, Journal of European Public Policy, 9, 3.
24.
Hughes Hallett, A.J.
, Ma, Y., Demertzis, M. (2000), ‘The single currency and labour market flexibility: a necessary partnership?’Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 47, pp. 141-155.
25.
Issing, O.
(2002), ‘On macroeconomic policy coordination’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, pp. 345-358.
26.
Jacquet, P.
and Pisani-Ferry, J. (2001), Economic Policy Coordination in the Euro-Zone: What has been Achieved? What Should be Done?London, Centre for European Reform.
27.
Kydland, F.E.
and Prescott, E.C. (1977), ‘Rules rather than discretion: time inconsistency of optimal plans’, The Journal of Political Economy, 85, 3, pp. 473-492.
28.
Leith, C.
and Wren-Lewis, S. (2000), ‘Interactions between monetary and fiscal policy rules’, Economic Journal, 110, C93-C108.
29.
Meyer, C.
(2002), ‘The soft side of hard policy co-ordination in EMU: peer review and publicised opinion in Germany and Ireland’, paper presented to the ECPR Conference, Bordeaux, 27 September.
30.
Muscatelli, A.
and Trecroci, C. (2000), ‘Monetary policy rules, policy preferences and uncertainty: recent empirical evidence’, Journal of Economic Surveys, 14, pp. 597-627.
31.
Rawlinson, F.
(1993), ‘The role for policy frameworks, codes and guidelines in the control of states aid’, in Harden, I. (ed.), State Aid: Community Law and Policy, Cologne, Bundesanzeiger.
32.
Rogoff, K.
(1985), ‘Can international monetary policy cooperation be counterproductive?’, Journal of International Economics, 18, pp. 199-217.
33.
Sargent, T.
and Wallace, N. (1981), ‘Some unpleasant monetarist arithmetic’, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 5, 3 (Fall), pp. 1-17.
34.
Swedish Government
(2002), ‘Stabilisation policy in the monetary union: a summary of the report’, The Commission on Stabilisation Policy for Full Employment in the event of Sweden joining the Monetary Union, Swedish Government Official Reports SOU 2002:16, Stockholm, Fritzes Offentliga Publikationer.
35.
Thygesen, N.
(2002), ‘Discussion’, OECD Development Centre Seminar: Peer Pressure as Part of Surveillance by International Institutions, 4 June. Available online at: http://www.oecd.org/pdf/M00031000/M00031293.pdf [accessed 6/1/2003].
