Using annual observations on industrial production over the last three centuries, and on GDP over a 100-year period, we seek an historical perspective on the forecastability of these UK output measures. The series are dominated by strong upward trends, so we consider various specifications of this, including the local linear trend structural time-series model, which allows the level and slope of the trend to vary. Our results are not unduly sensitive to how the trend in the series is modelled: the average sizes of the forecast errors of all models, and the wide span of prediction intervals, attests to a great deal of uncertainty in the economic environment. It appears that, from an historical perspective, the postwar period has been relatively more forecastable.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Box, G.E.P. and Jenkins, G.M. (1976), Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control, San Francisco, Holden-Day (first published 1970).
2.
Central Statistical Office (1993), Economic Trends Annual Supplement, London, HMSO.
Christoffersen, P.F (1998), ‘Evaluating interval forecasts’, International Economic Review, 39, pp. 841-862.
5.
Clements, M.P. and Hendry, D.F. (1996), ‘Intercept corrections and structural change’, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, pp. 475-494.
6.
Clements, M.P. and Hendry, D.F. (1998a), ‘Forecasting economic processes’, International Journal of Forecasting, 14, pp. 111-131.
7.
Clements, M.P. and Hendry, D.F. (1998b), Forecasting Economic Time Series: The Marshall Lectures on Economic Forecasting, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
8.
Clements, M.P. and Hendry, D.F. (1999a), Forecasting Non-stationary Economic Time Series: The Zeuthen Lectures on Economic Forecasting, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
9.
Clements, M.P. and Hendry, D.F. (1999b), ‘Modelling methodology and forecast failure’, Econometrics Journal (forthcoming).
10.
Clements, M.P. and Hendry, D.F. (2001), ‘Forecasting with difference-stationary and trend-stationary models’, Econometrics Journal, 4, S1-S19.
11.
Clements, M.P. and Taylor, N. (2001), ‘Bootstrapping prediction intervals for autoregressive models’, International Journal of Forecasting (forthcoming).
12.
Crafts, N.F.R. and Harley, C.K. (1992), ‘Output growth and the British Industrial Revolution: a restatement of the Crafts-Harley view’, Economic History Review, 45, pp. 703-730.
13.
Diebold, F.X. and Mariano, R.S. (1995), ‘Comparing predictive accuracy’, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13, pp. 253-263.
14.
Eitrheim, Ø, Husebø, T.A. and Nymoen, R. (1999), ‘Equilibrium-correction versus differencing in macroeconometric forecasting’, Economic Modelling, 16, pp. 515-544.
15.
Ericsson, N.R. (1992), ‘Parameter constancy, mean square forecast errors, and measuring forecast performance: an exposition, extensions, and illustration’, Journal of Policy Modeling, 14, pp. 465-495.
16.
Hand, D.J. (1999), ‘Discussion contribution on “Data mining reconsidered: encompassing and the general-to-specific approach to specification search” by Hoover and Perez’, Econometrics Journal, 2, pp. 241-243.
17.
Harvey, A.C. (1989), Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
18.
Harvey, D., Leybourne, S. and Newbold, P. (1997), ‘Testing the equality of prediction mean squared errors’, International Journal of Forecasting, 13, pp. 281-291.
19.
Harvey, D., Leybourne, S. and Newbold, P. (1998), ‘Tests for forecast encompassing’, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 16, pp. 254-259.
20.
Hendry, D.F. (1995), Dynamic Econometrics, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
21.
Hendry, D.F. (2000a), ‘Does money determine UK inflation over the long run?’ in Backhouse, R. and Salanti, A. (eds), Macroeconomics and the Real World, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
22.
Hendry, D.F. (2000b), ‘On detectable and non-detectable structural change’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 11, pp. 45-65.
23.
Kiviet, J.F. (1986), ‘On the rigor of some mis-specification tests for modelling dynamic relationships’, Review of Economic Studies, 53, pp. 241-261.
24.
Mellis, C. and Whittaker, R. (2000), ‘The Treasury’s forecasts of GDP and the RPI: how have they changed and what are the uncertainties?’ in Holly, S. and Weale, M. (eds), Econometric Modelling: Techniques and Applications, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
25.
Mitchell, B.R. (1988), British Historical Statistics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
26.
Phillips, P.C.B. (1994), ‘Bayes models and forecasts of Australian macroeconomic time series’ in Hargreaves, C. (ed.), Non-stationary Time-series Analyses and Cointegration, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
27.
Poulizac, D., Weale, M. and Young, G. (1996), ‘The performance of National Institute economic forecasts’, National Institute Economic Review, 156, pp. 56-62.
28.
forthcoming in Clements, M.P. and Hendry, D.F. (eds) (2001), A Companion to Economic Forecasting, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
29.
Schwarz, G. (1978), ‘Estimating the dimension of a model’, Annals of Statistics, 6, pp. 461-464.
30.
Swanson, N.R. and White, H. (1997), ‘Forecasting economic time series using flexible versus fixed specification and linear versus nonlinear econometric models’, International Journal of Forecasting, 13, pp. 439-462.
31.
Wallis, K.F. (1995), ‘Large-scale macroeconometric modelling’, in Pesaran, M.H. and Wickens, M.R. (eds), Handbook of Applied Econometrics: Macroeconomics, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
32.
West, K.D. and McCracken, M.W. (1998), ‘Regression-based tests of predictive ability’, International Economic Review, 39, pp. 817-840.
