BoodmanSandra G., “What You Can't Know About Your Doctor,”Washington Post, September 14, 1993.
2.
id.
3.
Shelton v. Morehead Memorial Hosp., 347 S.E. 2d 824 (N.C.) 1986).
4.
Humana Hospital v. Superior Court, 742, P.2d 1382, 1386 (Ariz. App.1987).
5.
id. See, also, Anderson v. Breda, 700 P.2d 737, 740 (1985) (“The Legislature recongised that external access to committee ivnestigations stiffles candor and inhibits constructive criticism thought necessary to effective quality review.”).
6.
Comment, The Medical Review Committee Privilege: A Jurisdictional Survey, 67 N.C.L. Rev. 179(1988).
7.
Humana Hospital v. Superior Court, supra note 4, at 1386.
8.
Greenwood v. Wierdsma, 741 P.2d 1079, 1089 (Wyo. 1987).
9.
67 N.C. Law REv., supra note 6, at 180.
10.
Coburn v. Seda, 677 P.2d 173, 178 (Wash. 1984).
11.
Md. Health Occupations §14–501 (c).
12.
Md. Health Occupations §14–501 (d).
13.
Unnamed Physician v. Comm'n, 285 Md. 1, 12 (1979).
14.
Md. Health Occupations §14–501 (e).
15.
Jordan v. Ct. of App. før Fourth Sup. Jud. Dist, 701 S.W.2d 644 (Tex. 1985).
16.
Moretti v. Lowe, 592 A.2d 855 (R.I. 1991). See, also, Anderson v. Breda, supra note 5, at 740. “Because this immunity from discovery is in derogation of both common law and the general policy favoring discovery, it is to be strictly construed and limited to its intended purpose.” and Coburn v. Seda, supra note 10, at 173.
17.
Shelton v. Morehead Memorial Hosp., supra note 3, at 828.