BrahamsD.Enforced caesarean section: A US appeal. Lancet1990; 335: 1270.
2.
MahowaldM.Beyond abortion: Refusal of caesarean section. Bioethics1989; 3(2): 106–121.
3.
NelsonLJMillikenN.Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women. J Am Med Assoc1988; 259(7): 1060–1066.
4.
AnnasG.Forced cesarean sections; the most unkindest cut of all. Hastings Cent Rep198212(3): 16–17, 45.
5.
RhodenNK. Cesareans and Samaritans. Law Med Health Care1987; 15(3): 118–125.
6.
Roe v Wade. 410 United States Supreme Court 113, 93 Supreme Court Reporter 705, 35 Lawyer's Edition 2nd 147.
7.
C v S [1987] 1 All ER 1230, [1988] QB 135, [1987] 2 WLR 1108, QBD and CA.
8.
KlugeE-H.When caesarian section operations imposed by a court are justified. J Med Eth1988; 14(4): 206–211.
9.
GallagherJ.Prenatal invasions and interventions: What's wrong with fetal rights. Harvard Women's Law J198710: 9–58.
10.
RobertsonJ.Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth. 69Va L Rev1983; 405.
11.
EekelaarJ.Does a mother have legal duties to her unborn child? In ByrnePA, ed Health, Rights and Resources. Oxford: Kings' Fund/OUP1988: 55–75. f.
12.
BlankRH. Emerging notions of women's rights and responsibilities during gestation. J. Legal Med1986; 7(4): 441–469.
13.
BrockDWartmanS.When competent patients make irrational choices. N Engl J. Med1990; 322: 1595–1599.
14.
BeauchampTChildressJ.Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
15.
GilliganC.Moral orientation and moral development. In: KittayEMeyersD. Eds. Women and Moral Theory. New Jersey: Rowman and Littlefield, 1987: 19–23.
16.
PellegrinoED. The virtuous physician, and the ethics of medicine. In BeauchampTWaltersL. Contemporary Issues in Bioethics. Belmont, Ca.: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1989: 316–322.
17.
KolderVGallagherJParsonsM.Court-ordered obstetrical interventions. N Engl J Med1987; 316(19): 1192–1196.
18.
In re AC 533 A.2d 611 D.C. App. (1987) And In reAC DC Court of Appeals, April 26, 1990, in press.
19.
GostinL.An ASLM briefmg: Women & health. Am Soc Low & Med Briefings1990: 3: 1, 5.
20.
Re F (in utero) [1988] 2 All ER 193.
21.
D v Berkshire County Council [1987] 1 All ER 20.
22.
MorganD. Re F (in utero). J Soc Welfare Law1988; 197–203.
23.
In re President & Directors of Georgetown College, Inc. 118 US App. DC at 88, 331 F.2d at 1008.
24.
ParisJCroneRReardonF.Physicians' refusal of requested treatment: The case of baby L. N Engl J Med1990; 322: 1012–1015.
25.
ACOG Committee Opinion. Patient choice: maternal-fetal conflict. October 1987; 55.
26.
ACOG Technical Bulletin. Ethical decision-making in obstetrics and gynecology. November 1989; 136.
27.
DimondB.Consent, compulsion, and the rights of the mother and unborn child. Midwives Chronicle and Nursing Notes1986; 99: 78–80.
28.
Davis v Davis. Tenn Cir Ct Blount Cty, No E-14496, 9/21/89. 15 FLR 2097.
29.
Webster v Reproductive Health Services, No. 88–605. 57 LW 5023.
30.
SteinERedmanC.Decision making in difficult pregnancies. In: 49th proceedings Soc App Anth 1990: Assembling Knowledge to Address Human Problems.
31.
F v R (1983) 33SASR189 (Supreme Court of South Australia).