Malpractice litigation in acute stroke care

Abstract

Acute stroke care has undergone momentous changes in recent years with the introduction of intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy and integrated stroke services. While these are welcome developments, they also carry unique medico-legal challenges. In 2015, a patient from Greater Manchester was awarded over £1 million in compensation after ambulance paramedics failed to admit her to a specialist unit. This paper explores the medico-legal implications of this first but over looked thrombolysis-related claim in the United Kingdom. It is submitted that the highly time-dependent and multidisciplinary nature of acute stroke care may expose a host of healthcare personnel, both medical and non-medical, to risks of legal pursuit for failing to provide appropriate care, and that available scientific evidence will likely support such claims. The situation calls for an urgent and concerted effort at implementing improvement measures at national levels. A reminder of the legal consequences of substandard acute stroke care is timely and necessary.

Keywords

Medico-legal negligence thrombectomy thrombolysis standard of care acute stroke management

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alper

Malone-Moses

McLellan

et al.

Thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: time for a rethink?

BMJ 2015; 350: h1075.

Bruce

Neil

Zivin

. Medico-legal aspects of using tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke. Curr Treat Opinions Cardiovasc Med 2011; 13: 233–239.

Bhatt

Safdar

Chaudhari

et al.

Medicolegal considerations with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in stroke: a systematic review. Stroke Res Treatment 2013; 2013: 562564.

Keeling N. Payout for stroke victim left paralysed after being taken to the wrong hospital. Manchester Evening News, www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/payout-stroke-victim-left-paralysed-9604282 (7 July 2015, accessed 1 October 2017).

The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1581–1587.

Wardlaw

Murray

Berge

et al.

Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 7: CD000213.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Stroke and transient ischaemic attack in over 16s: diagnosis and initial management, www.nice.org.uk/guidance/Cg68 (23 July 2008, accessed 5 November 2017).

Phan

Zhao

Phan

. Endovascular therapy including thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. J Clin Neurosci 2016; 29: 38–45.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Mechanical clot retrieval for treating acute ischaemic stroke. Interventional Procedures Guidance [IPG548], www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg548/chapter/6-Committee-comments (February 2016, accessed 5 November 2017).

10.

Chen

Lin

Chen

et al.

The medicolegal issue of tissue plasminogen activator in ischemic stroke: a review of judiciary decrees in Taiwan. Acta Neurol Taiwan 2011; 20: 163–171.

11.

Williams

. Litigation against English NHS ambulance services and the rule in Kent v. Griffiths. Med Law Rev 2007; 15: 153–175.

12.

Herring

. The legal duties of carers. Med Law Rev 2010; 18: 248–255.

13.

Recupero

. Clinical practice guidelines as learned treatises: understanding their use as evidence in the courtroom. J Am Acad Psych Law 2008; 36: 290–301.

14.

Samanta

Mello

Foster

et al.

The role of clinical guidelines in medical negligence litigation: a shift from the Bolam standard?

Med Law Rev 2006; 14: 321–366.

15.

Choudhury v (1) South Central Ambulance Service NHS, (2) Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 1311 (QB).

16.

Gregg v Scott [2005] UKHL 2, (2005) 82 BMLR 52.

17.

Ensink vs Mecosta County General Hospital, 262 Mich. APP. 518, 687 N.W. 2d 143. June 17, 2004.

18.

Blyth

Dudley

. Litigation risks with the National Stroke Strategy. BMJ 2007; 335. [Response to: Short R. UK government to spend 105m pounds sterling to improve stroke services. BMJ 2007; 335: 1231.], www.bmj.com/content/335/7632/1231.2/rapid-responses (accessed 26 November 2017).

19.

Williams v The Bermuda Hospitals Board [2016] UKPC 4.

20.

Ramsay

Morris

Hoffman

et al.

Effects of centralizing acute stroke services on stroke care provision in two large metropolitan areas in England. Stroke 2015; 46: 2244–2251.

21.

American Heart Association and American Stroke Association. Ground-breaking Illinois stroke bill signed into law, www.heart.org/idc/groups/heart-public/@wcm/@mwa/documents/downloadable/ucm_468048.pdf (18 August 2014, accessed 1 October 2017).

22.

NHS England. New ambulance service standard announced, www.england.nhs.uk/2017/07/new-ambulance-service-standards-announced/ (13 July 2017, accessed 13 November 2017).

23.

NHS Litigation Authority. Annual report and accounts 2015/16: resolve and learn, http://www.nhsla.com/AboutUs/Documents/NHS_Litigation_Authority_Annual_Report_and_Accounts_2015-2016.pdf (accessed 19 October 2017).

24.

O’Malley

. Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007: implications for healthcare providers. J Manag Market Healthcare 2008; 1: 297–305.

Malpractice litigation in acute stroke care – where are we now?

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References