Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Four hundred adult claimants underwent medico-legal assessment following upper limb injuries. Dynamometry was performed on each using the Jamar five handle-position test. Injury causes loss of power and there is a significant relationship between the percentage loss of power and the measured whole limb impairment. This paper presents a new approach for the analysis of the tests. The normal physiological length–tension pattern of muscle is maintained in the majority of claimants albeit with modifications due to the specific effects of injury on hand function. This paper provides normative data for the analysis of dynamometry in this population and makes recommendations for parameters that suggest that a test is a true reflection of capacity and thus useable in court.

Keywords

Dynamometry grip strength Jamar hand injury medicolegal assessment disability sub-maximal malingering

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Young

Kraemer

. Fluctuation in grip and pinch strength among normal subjects. J Hand Surg 1989; 4A: 125–129.

Ghori

Chung

. A decision-analysis model to diagnose feigned hand weakness. J Hand Surg 2007; 32A: 1638–1643.

Gordon

Huxley

Julian

. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol 1966; 184: 170–192.

Goldman

Cahalan

K-N

. The injured upper extremity and the Jamar five-handle position grip test. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 70: 306–308.

Hildreth

Breidenbach

Lister

. Detection of submaximal effort by use of the rapid exchange grip. J Hand Surg 1989; 14A: 742–745.

Stokes

. The seriously uninjured hand – weakness of grip. J Occup Med 1983; 25: 683–684.

Stokes

Landrieu

Domangue

. Identification of low-effort patients through dynamometry. J Hand Surg Am 1995; 20A: 1047–1056.

Niebuhr

Marion

. Detecting sincerity of effort when measuring grip strength. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 66: 16–24.

Tredgett

Pimble

Davis

. The detection of feigned hand weakness using the five position grip strength test. J Hand Surg 1999; 24B: 426–428.

10.

Belcher

HJCR

. Functional and symptomatic assessment of medico-legal claims after upper limb injuries. Medico-Legal J 10.1177/0025817216672114.

11.

Swanson

Göran-Hagert

de Groot Swanson

. Evaluation of impairment in the upper extremity. J Hand Surg 1987; 12A: 896–926.

12.

Shechtman

Gutierrez

Kokendofer

. Analysis of the statistical methods used to detect submaximal effort with the five-rung grip strength test. J Hand Ther 2005; 18: 10–18.

13.

Poole

CJM

. Illness deception and work: incidence, manifestations and detection. Occup Med 2010; 60: 127–132.

14.

Matheson

Bohr

Hart

. Use of maximum voluntary effort testing to identify symptom magnification syndrome. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 1998; 10: 125–135.

The assessment of grip strength after upper limb injuries in medico-legal practice

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References