This article is, essentially, an examination of what the medical profession and society generally mean by the term ‘mad’, and what relevance ‘madness’ has to modern psychiatry. It suggests that ‘madness’ differs from ‘mental illness’ and that psychiatry only deals with the latter. It concludes that for any rigorous, rational approach to psychiatry to be attempted an accepted framework of what constitutes mental illness must be used. This is the important role of ICD 10 and DSM IV which help to ensure that psychiatrists do not act as ‘moral gaolers of the state’.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GelderGathMayou (1989) The Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry, 2nd edn.Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 148.
2.
Hill (1972) The World Turned Upside Down: radical ideas during the English revolution. London, Templesmith.
3.
Nietzsche, trans, by HollingdaleR. J. (1990) Beyond Good and Evil. Britain, Penguin, p. 103.
4.
OvidTransGreenP. (1982) Cures for Love. Britain, Penguin, p. 254.
5.
RosenhanD.SeligmanM. (1989) Abnormal Psychology, 2nd edn. USA, Norton, p. 14.
6.
ShakespeareW. (1982) Hamlet. Arden, p. 385.
7.
SzaszT. S. (1972) The Myth of Mental Illness: foundation of a theory of personal conduct. London, Paladin.
8.
WingJ. K. (1978) Reasoning About Madness. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 2, 19 and 21.