Miscarriages of Justice and the Court of Appeal, Richard Buxton QC ‘1993’ L.Q.R. 66–81.
14.
Miscarriages of Justice, JUSTICE, 1989.
15.
Neutral expert: An implausible bogey. J. Spencer ‘1991’ Crim. L.R.106.
16.
Neutral expert: A plausible threat to justice. M. Howard ‘1991’ Crim. L.R.98.
17.
OsterburgJ. W.WardR. H. (1992) Criminal Investigation, Anderson Publishing USA — reviewed (1993) Med. Sci. Law33, 181.
18.
PollardC. (1994) A case for disclosure?Crim. Law Rev.42.
19.
Report of the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice, Chairman Lord Runciman, Cmnd. 2263, July 1993, chapter 9, pp. 144–61, and recommendations pp. 262–301.
20.
Report on Forensic Science, House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, House of Lords paper 24, HMSO, 1993. Evidence HL Papers 24–1 and 24–11.
21.
RobertsonB.VignauxT. (1993) Why the NRC Report on DNA is wrong. N. L. J.142, 1619. See also N. L. J. 142, 1712.
22.
Role of Forensic Science Evidence in Criminal Proceedings, Royal Commission on Criminal Justice Research Study no. 11, HMSO, 1992. Full bibliography in appendix C.
23.
Role of Police Surgeons, Royal Commission on Criminal Justice Study No. 6 (1992) HMSO. (Diploma in forensic medicine would be a useful qualification.)
24.
Science and the Administration of Justice, Chairman His Honour Judge Christopher Oddie, JUSTICE and the Council for Science and Society, 1991 — reviewed (1992) Med. Sci. Law31, 274.
25.
ShiffD.NoblesR. (July 1993) London School of Economics Research into Miscarriages of Justice.
26.
SpencerJ. (1991) Evidence of experts. J.P.N.154, 668. The public defender, JUSTICE, 1988.
27.
Tregilgas-DaveyM. (1991) Miscarriages of justice within the English legal system, N. L. J.141, 668.