Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The influence of the person's age upon reproducibility in duplicate breath alcohol analyses is investigated. A total of n = 30,324 duplicate results (with both ≥0.01 g/210L) were selected and divided into eight age groups from 10–19, 20–29, and up through 80+. Two duplicate agreement criteria, +/- 10% of the mean and +/- 0.02 g/210L, were evaluated according to age. A X² _trend analysis was employed and resulted in: +/- 10% of mean criteria, P < 0.001 and +/- 0.02 g/210L criteria, P > 0.05. The proportions of duplicates not conforming to the two agreement standards along with 95% confidence intervals were: +/- 10% of mean, 0.026 (0.024 to 0.028) and +/- 0.02 g/210 L, 0.052 (0.050 to 0.054). Depending on the agreement criteria selected there will be proportional differences, but neither appears to be importantly influenced by the subject's age. The breath sampling criteria employed in the instrument studied does not appear to inhibit acceptable agreement, even in elderly subjects where the risk of respiratory disfunction increases.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Turner

J.M.

Mead

Wohl

M.E.

(1968) Elasticity of human lungs in relation to age. J. Appl. Physiol. 25, 664–71.

Leblanc

Rum

Milic-Emili

(1970) Effect of age and body position on airway closure in man. J. Appl. Physiol. 28, 448–51.

Mason

M. F.

Dubowski

K. M.

(1976) Breath alcohol analysis: uses, methods, and some forensic problems — review and opinion. J. For. Sci. 21:1, 9–41.

Morris

M. J.

Taylor

A. G.

(1987) Failure to provide a sample for breath alcohol analysis. The Lancet, 3 January, 37.

Russell

J. C.

Jones

R. L.

(1983) Breath ethyl alcohol concentration and analysis in the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin. Biochem. 16, 182–7.

Wilson

Sitar

D. S.

Molloy

W. D.

McCarthy

(1987) Effect of age and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on the breathalyzer estimation of blood alcohol level. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 5, 440–3.

Haas

Morris

J. F.

(1972) Breath-alcohol analysis in chronic bronchopulmonary disease. Arch. Environ. Health, 25, 114–18.

Altman

D. G.

(1991) Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman and Hall, 261–4.

Thompson

Howarth

R. J.

(1973) The rapid estimation and control of precision by duplicate determinations. The Analyst, 98, 1164, 153–60.

10.

Mandel

(1978) Accuracy and Precision: evaluation and interpretation of analytical results. In: Kolthoff

I. M.

Elving

P. J.

(eds) Treatise on Analytical Chemistry: Part I Theory and Practice 2nd ed. Vol. 1, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 256–60.

11.

Jones

A. W.

(1991) Letter to the Editor: Limits of detection and quantitation of ethanol in specimens of whole blood from drinking drivers analyzed by headspace gas chromatography. J. For. Sci. 36:5, 1277–9.

12.

Cobb

P. G. W.

Dabbs

M. D. G.

(1985) Report on the performance of the Lion Intoximeter 3000 and the Camic Breath Analyzer evidential breath alcohol measuring instruments during the period 16 April to 15 October 1984. HMSO, London

13.

Gomm

P. J.

Osselton

M. D.

Broster

C. G.

Johnson

N. M.

Upton

(1991) Study into the ability of patients with impaired lung function to use breath alcohol testing devices. Med. Sci. Law, 31:3, 221–5.

Evaluating the Variability of Duplicate Breath Alcohol Analyses as a Function of Subject Age

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References