This brief review paper is concerned with the phenomenon of retracted confession statements from legal, psychological and psychiatric viewpoints. The importance of distinguishing between three psychologically different types of ‘false confession’ is emphasized. The paper provides the clinician with a conceptual framework and ways of assessing alleged false confession cases.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaldwinJ.McConvilleM. (1980) Confessions in Crown Court Trials. Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure, Research Study No. 5. London, HMSO.
2.
BarthelJ. (1976) A Death in Canaan. Thomas Congdon Books.
3.
BeaumontM. (1987) Confessions, Cautions, Experts and the Subnormal after R. v. Silcott and others. New Law Journal, August 28, 807–14.
4.
BorchardE. M. (1970) Convicting the Innocent. Errors of Criminal Justice.New York, Da Capo Press.
5.
BrandonR.DaviesC. (1972) Wrongful Imprisonment. Mistaken Convictions and their Consequences.London, George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
6.
Fisher Report (1977) Report of an Inquiry by the Hon. Sir Henry Fisher into the circumstances leading to the trial of three persons on charges arising out of the death of Maxwell Confait and the fire at 27 Doggett Road, London SE6. London, HMSO.
7.
GudjonssonG. H. (1984) A new scale of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 303–14.
8.
GudjonssonG. H. (1987a) A parallel form to the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 215–21.
9.
GudjonssonG. H. (1987b) Compliance in an interrogative situation: A new scale. In preparation.
10.
GudjonssonG. H.ClarkN. (1986) Suggestibility in Police Interrogation: A Social Psychological Model. Social Behaviour, 1, 83–104.
11.
GudjonssonG. H.HawardL. R. C. (1983) Psychological analysis of confession statements. Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 23, 113–20.
12.
GudjonssonG. H.MacKeithJ. (1982) False Confessions. Psychological Effects of Interrogation: A Discussion Paper. In TrankellA. (Ed.) Reconstructing the Past: The Role of the Psychologist in Criminal Trials. Stockholm, P. A. Norstedt and Soners Forlag.
13.
Home Office (1978) Judges' Rules and Administrative Directions to the Police. Circular No. 89/1978.
14.
Home Office (1985a) Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. London, HMSO.
15.
Home Office (1985b) Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (s. 66). Codes of Practice. London, HMSO.
16.
InbauF. E.ReidJ. (1967) Criminal Interrogations and Confessions.Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins.
17.
IrvingB. (1980) Police Interrogation. A Case Study of Current practice. Research Study No. 2. London, HMSO.
18.
IrvingB.HilgendorfL. (1980) Police Interrogation. The Psychological Approach. Research Study No. I. London, HMSO.
19.
KassinS. M.WrightsmanL. S. (1985) Confession Evidence. In KassinS. M.WrightmanL. S. (Eds) The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure. Sage Publications.
MitchellB. (1983) Confessions and Police Interrogation of Suspects. Criminal Law Review, September, 596–604.
22.
PriceC. (1985) Confession Evidence, the Police and Criminal Evidence Act and the Confait Case. In J. Baxter and L. Koffman. London, Professional Books Ltd.
23.
VennardJ. (1984) Disputes Within Trials Over the Admissibility and Accuracy of Incriminating Statements: Some Research Evidence. Criminal Law Review, January, 15–24.
24.
VennardJ. (1985) The Outcome of Contested Trials. In MoxtonD. (Ed.) Managing Criminal Justice. A Collection of Papers. London, HMSO.
25.
WaldM.AyersR.HessD. W.SchantzM.WhitebreadC. H. (1967) Interrogations in New Haven: The impact of Miranda. Yale Law Journal, 76, 1519–1648.
