This study examines the controversy regarding the presence of sex differences in eyewitness behaviour using data derived from 379 statements concerning 135 cases of real-life assaults. Two questions are considered: (1) is the presence of a sex difference dependent on the level of violence witnessed? And (2) is the presence of a sex difference dependent on the specific type of information reported? The results indicate that sex differences in eyewitnessing can be dependent upon both of these factors but that their effects appear to be more subtle than had been anticipated. The findings are discussed in the light of existing research, and recommendations for future research are considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BahrickH. P.BahrickP. O.WittlingerR. P. (1975) Fifty years of memory for names and faces: a cross-sectional approach. J. Exper. Psychol.: General104, 54–75. Borst M. (1904) Recherches experimentalles sur l'educabilité et la fidelité du temoignage. Archives de Psychologie111, 1–30.
2.
ChaseW. G.SimonH. A. (1973) Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology4, 55–81.
3.
ChiesiH. L.SpilichG. J.VossJ. F. (1979) Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. J. Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior18, 257–74.
4.
CliffordB. R.BullR. (1978) The psychology of person identification.London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
5.
CliffordB. R.ScottJ. (1978) Individual and situational factors in eyewitness testimony. J. App. Psychol.63, 352–9.
6.
EaglyA. H.RennerP.CarliL. L. (1983) Using meta-analysis to examine biases in gender-difference research. Presented at Annual Meeting American Psychological Association, Anaheim, California.
7.
EllisH. D.ShepherdJ. W.BruceA. (1973) The effects of age and sex upon adolescents' recognition of faces. J. Genetic Psychol.123, 173–4.
8.
GrossH. (1897) Criminal Psychology. Leipzig.
9.
KahnemanD. (1973) Attention and effort.Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
10.
KeppelG. (1982) Design and analysis: a researcher's handbook (2nd ed.) Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
11.
KirkR. E. (1968) Experimental design: procedures for the behavioural sciences. Belmossant, Brooks-Cole.
12.
KuehnL. L. (1974) Looking down a gun barrel: person perception and violent crime. Perceptual and Motor Skills39, 1159–64.
13.
LiptonJ. P. (1977) On the psychology of eyewitness testimony. J. App. Psychol.62, 90–5.
14.
MacLeodM. D. (1985) Perspectives on an assault: varying accounts by different witnesses. Presented at NATO Conference, The role of psychology in the selection and training of police, Skiathos, Greece.
15.
MazanecN.McCallG. J. (1975) Sex, cognitive categories, and observational accuracy. Psychol. Rep.37, 987–90.
16.
McCallG. J.MazanecN.EriksonW. L.SmithH. W. (1974) Same-sex recall effects in tests of observational accuracy. Perceptual and Motor Skills38, 830.
17.
McKelvieS. J. (1978) Sex differences in facial memory. In: Practical Aspects of Memory (GrunebergM. M.MorrisP. E.SykesR. N. Eds). London, Academic Press.
18.
McKelvieS. J. (1981) Sex differences in memory for faces. J. Psychol.107, 109–25.
19.
PowersP. A.AndriksJ. L.LoftusE. F. (1979) Eyewitness accounts of females and males. J. App. Psychol.64, 339–47.
20.
SchönpflugW. (1983) Coping efficiency and situational demands. In: Stress and fatigue in human performance (Hockey R., Ed.) Chichester, John Wiley and Sons.
21.
ShepherdJ. W. (1981) Social factors in face recognition. In: Perceiving and remembering faces (DaviesG. M.EllisH. D.ShepherdJ. W., Eds.) London, Academic Press.
22.
SistrunkF.McDavidJ. W. (1971) Sex variable in conforming behavior. J. Person. Soc. Psychol.17, 200–7.
23.
SternL. W. (1902) Zur Psych. d. Aussage. Exp. Untersuchengen uber Erinnerungstreve. Zeits. f.d.ges. Strafrechtwissenschaft.22.
24.
SternL. W. (1910) Abstracts of lectures on the psychology of testimony and on the study of individuality. Am. J. Psychol.21, 270–81.
25.
WhippleG. (1909) The observer as reporter: a survey of the ‘psychology of testimony’. Psychol. Bull.6, 153–70.
26.
WhippleG. (1910) Recent literature on the psychology of testimony. Psychol. Bull.7, 365.
27.
WitryolS. L.KaessW. A. (1957) Sex differences in social memory tasks. J. Ab. Soc. Psychol.54, 343–6.
28.
YarmeyA. D. (1979) The psychology of eyewitness testimony.New York, The Free Press.
29.
YarmeyA. D.JohnsonJ. (1982) Evidence for the self as an imaginal prototype. J. Res. Person.16, 238–46.
30.
YarmeyA. D.JonesH. P. (1983) Accuracy of memory of male and female eyewitnesses to a criminal assault and rape. Bull. Psychonomic Soc.21, 89–92.
