This paper considers the reasons behind the ever-increasing subscription rates of the medical defence societies. The present fault-based system of compensation is discussed and alternative compensation schemes are considered. It is concluded that the present fault-based system is likely to be maintained and the need is identified for continuing education in this field.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtiyahP. S. (1975) Accidents, Compensation and the Law.London, Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
2.
Barnett v. Kensington & Chelsea Hospital Management Committee [1969] 1 Q.B. 42.
3.
Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 2 All E.R. 118.
4.
BoughtonB. J. (1983) Correspondence. Brit. Med. J.287, 364.
5.
Hunter v. Hanley [1955] S.C. 200.
6.
LongerbeamJ. K. (1983) The national perspective: A crisis may be in the wings. Bull. Am. Coll. Surg. Feb., 3–10.
7.
Royal Commission on Civil Liability and Compensation for Personal Injury. (Pearson Commission) (1978) Report.London, HMSO, (Cmnd 7054).
8.
SmithR. (1982) Compensation: The world's best system of compensating injury?Brit. Med. J.284, 1243–1245; 1323–1325; 1457–1459.
