AnnasG. J.Fathers anonymous: Beyond the best interests of the sperm donor, (1980) 14Family Law Quarterly 1.
2.
BartholomewG. W.Legal implications of artificial insemination, (1958) 21Modern Law Review 236.
3.
BermanD. H.The Role of Law in Population Planning, Oceana, 1972.
4.
BurdenellM. Artificial insemination: Proceedings of the Fourth Study Group, RCOG, 1976.
5.
CIBA Foundation 17, Law and Ethics of AID and Embryo Transfer, 1973, Associated Scientific Publishers, Amsterdam—especially Dr Olive Stone 69–76, and paper by EdwardsR. G.SteptoeP. C.11–18.
6.
Croft Ian, The case for the test-tube, Sunday Times, 31 January 1982.
7.
DouglasJ. CusineSome legal implications of embryo transfer (1979) 129New Law Journal 626.
8.
Feversham, Report of Departmental Committee on Human Artificial Insemination, Cmnd. 1105, July 1960.
9.
Finch John, No wrongful life (1982) 126New Law Journal 235.
10.
GlaisterMedical Jurisprudence, 13th edition, 1973, p. 366.
11.
HargroveB.Artificial insemination by donor (1958) 25Solicitor165.
12.
KatzB. F. Legal implications and regulation of in vitro fertilisation, Genetics and Law, 1980, 351.
13.
Kilbrandon Lord, Ethics in Medical Progress, CIBA, Churchill, London, 1966.
14.
HarryD. KrauseIllegitimacy: Law and social policy, Bobbs-Merrill, 1971, pp. 18–19, 243.
15.
Law Commission, Illegitimacy, No. 74, para. 10(9), 1979.
16.
Mayo Marylyn Mason, Legitimacy for the AID child, (1976) 6Family Law19–24.
17.
PloscoweM.Family Law Cases and Materials, second edition, Little Brown Co., Boston and Toronto, 1972.
18.
LaurencePolak A.A doctrinaire or rationalist approach (1973) 3Family Law86, 87–88.
19.
PollardD. W.Report of the departmental committee on human artificial insemination (1961) 24Modern Law Review 158.
20.
PuxonM.Legitimacy and artificial insemination (1960) 104Solicitors' Journal 575.
21.
PuxonM.Without father bred (1958) 102Solicitors' Journal 95.
22.
ReillyP. In vitro fertilisation: A legal perspective, Genetics and Law, 1976, p. 359.
23.
ReillyP.Genetics, Law and Social Policy, Harvard University Press, 1978.
24.
DavidS. RosettensteinDefining a parent (1981) 131New Law Journal 1095.
25.
Samuels Alec, Blood test law and practice (1981) 11Family Law 124.
26.
SnowdenR.MitchellG. D.The Artificial Family, Allen and Unwin, 1981.
27.
StevasN.St JohnLife, Death and the Law, 1960.
28.
TallinArtificial insemination (1958) 34Canadian Bar Review1, 166.
29.
GlanvilleWilliamsSanctity of Life and the Criminal Law, 1958.
30.
GerardWrightCapable of being born alive (1981) 125New Law Journal 140.
31.
Royal Commission on Marriage and Divorce, Cmnd. 9678, para. 90.
32.
Report of a Committee appointed by the Archbishop of Canterbury on Artificial Human Insemination, S.P.C.K., 1948.
33.
Legitimacy Bill 1959, Hansard, House of Commons, col. 760, 8 May 1959.
34.
The Times4, 10 and 11 February 1982.
35.
Test Tube Explosion, ITV, Tuesday 2 February 1982.
36.
Genetics and the Law, I 1976, II 1980.
37.
Report of the US Ethics Advisory Board, 1978.
38.
The Times, 1 March 1974.
39.
BMA Report of a Panel of the Board of Science and Education 1972—recommending against embryo transfer.
40.
BMA Report of the Panel on Human Artificial Insemination, Chairman Sir John Peel, 1973, B.M.J.2, supplementary appendix V, p. 3.