It is suggested that the important Field of socio-forensic studies has been neglected although it is one that provides a viable area for development at social work post-professional qualification level. An indication of the manner in which this might be achieved is given on the basis of some exploratory work undertaken by the author at the University of Leicester.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlairD. (1971) Life sentence then suicide: The sad case of Richard HolmesMed. Sci. Law11, 162–179.
2.
HardingR. E. M. (1967) An Anatomy of Inspiration. London, Cass, p. 5.
3.
PrinsH. A. (1975) A danger to themselves and to others: Social workers and potentially dangerous clientsBr. J. Soc. Work5, 297–309.
4.
PrinsH. A. (1976) The Butler Committee's Report: Community care aspectsBr. J. Criminal.16, 181–183.
5.
PrinsH. A. (1977) Who is the psychopath? A rejoinder and a commentMed. Sci. Law17, 241–245.
6.
Report of the Committee on Local Authority and Allied Personal Social Services (Seebohm Committee) (1968). Cmnd 3703. London, HMSO, para. 549.
7.
Report of the Committee on Mentally Abnormal Offenders (Butler Committee) (1975). Cmnd 6244. London, HMSO.
8.
Report on the Review of Procedures for the Discharge and Supervision of Psychiatric Patients subject to Special Restrictions (Aarvold Committee) (1973). Cmnd 5191. London, HMSO.
9.
ScottP. D. (1977) Assessing dangerousness in criminalsBr. J. Psychiatry131, 127–142.
