The over-representation of neurodivergent children in Youth Justice Systems and The Youth Court

Taylor C . Review of the Youth Justice System in England and Wales. London: Ministry of Justice. 2016. Available at Review of the Youth Justice System (publishing.service.gov.uk)

Clasby B Mirfin-Veitch B Blackett R , et al. Responding to neurodiversity in the courtroom: a brief evaluation of environmental accommodations to increase procedural fairness. Crim Behav Ment Health 2022; 32: 197–211.

Department for Education and Ministry of Justice. Education, children’s social care and offending: Descriptive statistics. UK. 2022.

Hughes N Peirse-O’Byrne K . Disabled inside: neurodevelopmental impairments among young people in custody. Prison Serv J July 2016. 2016; 226: 14–21

Day A Bateman T Pitts J . Surviving incarceration: the pathways of looked after and non-looked after children into, through and out of custody. University of Bedfordshire. 2020.

Bower C Watkins RE Mutch RC , et al. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder and youth justice: a prevalence study among young people sentenced to detention in Western Australia. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e019605.

Popova S Lange S Bekmuradov D , et al. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder prevalence estimates in correctional systems: a systematic literature review. Can J Public Health 2011; 102: 336–340.

Criminal Justice Joint Inspection. Neurodiversity in the Criminal Justice System: A review of the evidence. London. 2021. Available at Neurodiversity in the criminal justice system: A review of evidence (justiceinspectorates.gov.uk).

Talbot. Prisoners Voices: Experiences of the criminal justice system by prisoners with learning disabilities and difficulties’, No-one Knows Report. London: Prison Reform Trust. 2008.

Bateman T . Bridging the care-crime gap: reforming the youth court? London: National Association of Youth Justice Briefing, 2021. Available at: reform_of_-youth_court-final-25th-october.pdf (thenayj.org.uk)

Maras K Marshall I Sands C . Mock juror perceptions of credibility and culpability in an autistic defendant. J Autism Dev Disord 2019; 49: 996–1010.

Sentencing Council Guidelines. Sentencing children and young people. London: Sentencing Council. 2017.

Haines K Case S . Is the scaled approach a failed approach? Youth Justice 2012; 12: 212–228.

Carlile A . Independent Parliamentarians’ inquiry into the operation and effectiveness of the youth court. London: Sieff Foundation. 2014. Available at Inquiry by Parliamentarians into the operation and effectiveness of the youth justice system, chaired by Lord Carlile (michaelsieff-foundation.org.uk).

Gray P . The political economy of risk and the new governance of youth crime. Punish Soc Int J Penology 2009; 11: 443–458.

Hepworth K . Young people within the criminal justice system: making sense of fitness to plead and mental capacity in practice. J Learn Disabil Offend Behav 2011; 2: 170–177.

Owusu-Bempah A . The Interpretation and Application of the Right to Effective Participation. Int J Evid Proof 2018; 22(4): 321–341.

Sixsmith A . Safeguarding the Procedural Rights of Young Defendants in England and Wales, 51-70. In: Wishart H Berryessa C (eds) Neurolaw in the courtroom: Comparative perspectives on vulnerable defendants. Oxon: UK: Routledge, 2024.

Hughes N , et al. Ensuring the rights of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities within child justice systems. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2020; 4: 163–166.

Centre for Justice Innovation. Problem Solving Courts: A guide to practice in the United Kingdom. London. 2023. Available at Problem-solving courts: A guide to practice in the United Kingdom | Centre for Justice Innovation.

Turner K Hughes N . Supporting young people's cognition and communication in the courtroom: A scoping review of current practices. Crim Behav Ment Health 2022; 32(3): 175–196.

Youth Justice Legal Centre. Intermediaries for Child Defendants. London. 2021a. Available at Intermediaries For Child Defendants (yjlc.uk).

Youth Justice Legal Centre. Effective Participation and Fitness to Plead. London. 2021b. Available at Effective participation and fitness to plead (yjlc.uk).

The Advocate’s Gateway. The Advocate’s Gateway Toolkits. London. 2024. Available at Toolkits | Advocate's Gateway (theadvocatesgateway.org).

National Autistic Society. My life could be so different: exploring the experiences of autistic young people in the youth justice system. 2022.

University of Nottingham. Nottinghamshire Autism Police Partnership. Nottingham. 2020. Available at Resources - The University of Nottingham.

Youth Justice Legal Centre. Criminal Practice Directions. London. 2021c. Available at YJLC-Guide-CPD.pdf.

Day A-M . Disabling and criminalising systems? Understanding the experiences and challenges facing incarcerated, neurodivergent children in the education and youth justice systems in England. Forensic Sci Int 2022; 100102: 1–9.