Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2022-7
Autonomy,liberty,and risk: The ethical and legal challenges of suspending leave of absence for patients detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 during the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic
During the COVID-19 pandemic, many governments around the world have imposed significant restrictions on freedom of movement to tackle the virus. Mental health units have mirrored this approach, implementing restrictive measures to safeguard the health of patients, staff, and the wider community. This paper explores the relevant legal provisions and ethical principles that guide medical decisions regarding restriction of liberty, before considering the suspension of leave from hospital that occurred in several mental health services in response to the pandemic. It reviews how existing ethical principles within the field of public health may support a better-informed decision-making process, should similar widespread restrictions be imposed again.
RosenthalESundramC. International human rights in mental health legislation. N Y Law School J Int Comp Law2001; 21: 469.
2.
WilsonK. The abolition or reform of mental health law: how should the law recognise and respond to the vulnerability of persons with mental impairment?Med Law Rev2020; 1: 30–64.
GosneyPBartlettP. The UK government should withdraw from the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Br J Psychiatry2020; 216: 296–300.
9.
WaddingtonLLawsonA. The UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities in practice: a comparative analysis of the role of courts. Oxford University Press, 2018.
10.
MeyerLH, editor. Legitimacy, justice and public international law. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
11.
Council of Europe. 2021. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14.https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf(accessed 20 February 2021).
12.
BrownCKeeneARHooperCR, et al.Isolation of patients in psychiatric hospitals in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: an ethical, legal, and practical challenge. Int J Law Psychiatry2020; 71: 101572.
13.
DixonMOyebodeF. Uncertainty and risk assessment. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2007;13:70–78.
14.
SandmanP. Responding to community outrage: strategies for effective risk communication. The American Industrial Hygiene Association, 1993.
15.
RoseN. In search of certainty: risk management in a biological age. J Public Ment Health2005; 4:14–22.
16.
EastmanNAdsheadGFoxS,et al.Forensic psychiatry. Oxford University Press; 2012.
17.
FreudenburgWR. Perceived risk, real risk: social science and the art of probabilistic risk assessment. Science1988; 242: 44–49.
WilliamsonEWalkerAJBhaskaranK, et al.OpenSAFELY: factors associated with COVID-19-related hospital death in the linked electronic health records of 17 million adult NHS patients. MedRxiv. 2020.
26.
SanyaoluAOkorieCMarinkovicA, et al.Comorbidity and its impact on patients with COVID-19. SN Comprehen Clin Med2020; 2: 1069–1076.
27.
HaddadMLlewellyn-JonesSYarnoldS, et al.Improving the physical health of people with severe mental illness in a low secure forensic unit: an uncontrolled evaluation study of staff training and physical health care plans. Int J Ment Health Nurs2016; 25: 554–565.
28.
NyashanuMPfendeFEkpenyongM. Exploring the challenges faced by frontline workers in health and social care amid the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences of frontline workers in the English midlands region, UK. J Interprof Care2020; 18: 1–7.
29.
PremKLiuYRussellTW, et al. The effect of control strategies to reduce social mixing on outcomes of the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan, China: a modelling study. Lancet Public Health2020; 5: e261–e270.
RepucciSSlipowitzA. Democracy under lockdown: the impact of COVID-19 on the global struggle for freedom. Freedom House; 2020, https://apo.org.au/node/308628(accessed 20 February 2022).
34.
BartlettP. The United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and the future of mental health law. Psychiatry2009; 8: 496–498.
35.
Rabone v Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust2012. UKSC.
World Health Organisation. Ethical considerations in developing a public health response to pandemic influenza 2007. Geneva WHO, 2007
40.
FlaxmanSMishraSGandyA, et al.Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe. Nature2020; 584: 257−561.
41.
United Nations Nations Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities. The Siracusa principles on the limitation and derogation provisions in the international covenant on civil and political rights 1984. Siracusa: UN, 1984.
42.
R v Broadmoor Special Hospital Authority, Ex Parte S, H and D. 1998. EWCA.
ReidK. A practitioner’s guide to the European convention on human rights. Sweet & Maxwell, 2011.
47.
CurticeMBashirFKhurmiS,et al.The proportionality principle and what it means in practice. Psychiatrist2011; 35: 111–116.
48.
WadhamJEdmundsonA. Blackstones guide to the human rights act 1998. Oxford University Press, 2009.
49.
WyniaMK. Ethics and public health emergencies: restrictions on liberty. Am J Bioeth2007; 7: 1–5.
50.
McLeodCSherwinS. Relational autonomy, self-trust, and health care for patients who are oppressed. Philosophy Publications, Western Universirty; 2000.
51.
WhitelawSMamasMATopolE, et al.Applications of digital technology in COVID-19 pandemic planning and response. Lancet Digit Health2020; 2: e435–e440.
52.
AntonelloVSPanzenhagenACBalanzá-MartínezV, et al.Virtual meetings and social isolation in COVID-19 times: transposable barriers. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2020; 42: 221–222.
53.
Care Quality Commission. 2019. Assessment of mental health services in acute trusts programme. How are people's mental health needs met in acute hospitals, and how can this be improved? https://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20201016b_AMSAT_report.pdf (accessed 06 March 2022).
