BaryahNKrishanKKanchanT.The development and status of forensic anthropology in India: a review of the literature and future directions.Med Sci Law2019;
59: 61–69.
2.
VaswaniVAhmedMN.Forensic anthropology education and training in India.Med Sci Law2020;
60: 83–84.
3.
CulbertWLLawFM.Identification by comparison of roentgenograms of nasal accessory sinuses and mastoid processes. JAMA1927;
88: 1634–1636.
4.
LawFM.Roentgenograms as a means of identification. Am J Surg1934;
26: 195–198.
5.
JayaprakashPT.Skull sutures: radiographic contour of Wormian bone as an individualising epigenetic marker. Can Soc Forensic Sci J1997;
30: 39–47.
6.
PushparaniCRavichandranCPSivakumariK.Radiography superimposition in personal identification – a case study involving surgical implants. J Forensic Res2012;
3.
7.
JayaprakashPT.Practical relevance of pattern uniqueness in forensic science. Forensic Sci Int2013;
231: 403.e1–16.
8.
Chandra SekharanP.Identification of skull from its suture pattern. Forensic Sci Int1985;
27: 205–214.
9.
JayaprakashPTSrinivasanGJ.Skull sutures: changing morphology during preadolescent growth and its implications in forensic identification.Forensic Sci Int2013;
229: 166.e1–13.
10.
HashimNHemalathaNThangarajK, et al.
Practical relevance of prescribing superimposition for determining a frontal sinus pattern match.Forensic Sci Int2015;
253: 137.e1–7.
11.
SenNK.Identification by superimposed photographs. Int Crim Pol Rev1962;
162: 284–286.
12.
Chandra SekharanP.A revised superimposition technique for identification of the individual from the skull and photograph. J Crim Law Crimin Pol Sci1971;
62: 107–113.
Chandra SekharanP.The problems of positioning skulls for video superimposition technique. Can Soc Forensic Sci J1989;
22: 21–25.
15.
Chandra SekharanP.Positioning the skull for superimposition. In: Iścan MYHelmer RP (eds) Forensic analysis of the skull – craniofacial analysis, reconstruction and identification.
New York:
Wiley Liss, Inc., 1993, pp.105–118.
16.
ReddyKNS.Identification of dismembered part: the medicolegal aspects of the Nagaraju case. Forensic Sci1973;
2: 351–374.
17.
SivaramSWadheraC.Identity from skeleton – a case study. Int Crimin Pol Rev1977;
308: 158–160.
18.
KumariTRChandra SekharanP. Superimposition technique: locating auditory meatus in face photographs. Ind J Forensic Sci1990;
4: 141–150.
19.
JayaprakashPTSrinivasanGJAmravaneswaranMG.Cranio-facial morphanalysis: a new method for enhancing reliability while identifying skulls by photo superimposition. Forensic Sci Int2001;
117: 121–143.
GhoshAKSinhaP.An unusual case of cranial image recognition.Forensic Sci Int2005;
148: 93–100.
22.
JayaprakashPTSinghBRidzuanA AMY, et al.
Skull-photo superimposition: a remedy to the problem of unidentified dead in Malaysia. Malay J Forensic Sci2010;
1: 35–42.
IbáñezOValsecchiACavalliF, et al.
Study on the criteria for assessing skull-face correspondence in craniofacial superimposition.Leg Med (Tokyo)2016;
23: 59–70.
KomarDAPotterWE.Percentage of body recovered and its effect on identification rates and cause and manner of death determination.Forensic Sci2007;
52: 528–531.
