BrownP. Unfitness to plead in England and Wales: Historical development and contemporary dilemmas. Medicine, Science and the Law2019;59(3):187–196.
3.
R v Pritchard (1836). 7 C&P 303.
4.
RogersTPBlackwoodNFarnhamFPickupGWattsM.Reformulating fitness to plead: A qualitative study.Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology2009;
20(6):815–34.
5.
ShahA.Making Fitness to Plead Fit for Purpose. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology2012;
1:176–97.
6.
Owusu-BempahA.The interpretation and application of the right to effective participation.The International Journal of Evidence & Proof2018;
22(4):321–41.
7.
Stanford v UK (ECHR, 23 February 1994) App no 16757/90
8.
T and Vv UK (2000). 30 EHRR 121.
9.
SC v United Kingdom [2005] 40 EHRR 10.
10.
BrownP.Reviewing the Age of Criminal Responsibility. Crim LR2018;
11:901–6.
11.
BevanM. Effective Participation in the Youth Court. Howard League: What is Justice? Reimagining penal policy working papers 2016.
12.
R v Orr [2016] EWCA Crim 889.
13.
Law Commission of England and Wales. Unfitness to Plead - Volume 1: Report (law com. No 364)London:
The Stationery Office; 2016.
Law Commission. Unfitness to Plead: Consultation ResponsesLondon:
The Stationery Office; 2013.
16.
Law Commission. Unfitness to Plead: An Issues PaperLondon:
The Stationery Office; 2014.
17.
Dusky v United States (1960). 362 US 402; 80 SCt, 788
18.
GrissoT.Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments (2nd Edition).
New York:
Plenum Press; 2003.
19.
MaherG.Unfitness for Trial in Scots Law. In: MackayRBrookbanksWJ, editors. Fitness to Plead: International and Comparative PerspectivesOxford:
Oxford University Press; 2018.
20.
FreckletonI.Fitness to Stand Trial under Australian Law. In: MackayRBrookbanksWJ, editors. Fitness to Plead: International and Comparative PerspectivesOxford:
Oxford University Press; 2018.
21.
WJ.BrookbanksThe Development of Unfitness to Stand Trial in New Zealand. In: MackayRBrookbanksWJ, editors. Fitness to Plead: International and Comparative PerspectivesOxford:
Oxford University Press; 2018.
22.
Attornery General v O’Driscoll (No. 2) [2003] JRC 117 (Royal Ct (Jer)).
23.
MackayR. On being insane in Jersey: Part 3- the case of Attorney General v O’Driscoll. Crim LR. 2004;April:291-6.
24.
Law Commission of England and Wales. Unfitness to Plead — Volume 2: Draft Legislation (law com. 364)London:
The Stationary Office; 2016.
25.
BrownPStahlDAppiah-KusiEBrewerRWattsMPeayJet al.
Fitness to plead: Development and validation of a standardised assessment instrument.PloS one2018;
13(4):e0194332.
26.
Commission L. Unfitness to Plead Report—Appendix B: Impact Assessment (Law Com No. 364)London:
The Stationary Office; 2016.
27.
CampbellPRixK.Fusion legislation and forensic psychiatry: the criminal justice provisions of the Mental Capacity Act (Northern Ireland) 2016.BJPsych Advances2018;
24(3):195–203.
SeriesL.Relationships, autonomy and legal capacity: Mental capacity and support paradigms.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry2015;
40:80–91.
30.
MinkowitzT.Rethinking criminal responsibility from a critical disability perspective: The abolition of insanity/incapacity acquittals and unfitness to plead, and beyond.Griffith Law Review2014;
23(3):434–66.
31.
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Concluding observations on the Initial Report of Republic of Korea, 29 October 2014, CRPD/C/KOR/CO/1. UNCRPD; 2014.
32.
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Concluding observations on the Initial Report of Ecuador, 27 October 2014, CRPD/C/ECU/CO/1. UNCRPD; 2014.
33.
KeyzerP.Fitness to Stand Trial and Disability Discrimination: An International Critique of Australia AU - Freckelton, Ian. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law2017;
24(5):770–83.
34.
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Guidelines on Article 14 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: The Right to Liberty and Security of Persons with Disabilities. UNCRPD2015.
35.
HowardH.Lack of Capacity: Reforming the Law on Unfitness to Plead. The Journal of Criminal Law2016;
80(6):428–35.
36.
DuffRA.Responsibility and Reciprocity.Ethical Theory and Moral Practice2018;
21(4):775–87.
