The Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC) manages the risk posed to public figures by fixated individuals by paying attention to their correspondence and approaches and liaising with the mental health and criminal justice agencies responsible for their management. This paper offers a narrative reflection on the clinical experience of this unusual work. The clinical population is significantly different from that seen in mainstream mental health services, with a preponderance of delusional disorders and paraphrenias. The interface with mental health and criminal justice systems around the UK and internationally also offers a unique perspective on the functioning and malfunctioning of these services, and we attempt to describe and make sense of these experiences.
JamesDVFarnhamFRWilsonSP.The Fixated Threat Assessment Center: implementing a joint policing and psychiatric approach to risk assessment and management in public figure threat cases. In: MeloyJRHoffmannJ (eds) International handbook of threat assessment.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 2013, pp.299–320.
2.
JamesDVFarnhamFRSukhwalS, et al.
Aggressive/intrusive behaviours, harassment and stalking of members of the United Kingdom parliament: a prevalence study and cross-national comparison.J Forens Psychiatry Psychol2016;
27:177–197.
3.
JamesDVSukhwalSFarnhamFR, et al.
Harassment and stalking of Members of the United Kingdom Parliament: associations and consequences.J Forens Psychiatry Psychol2016;
27:309–330.
4.
MeloyRHoffmanJGuldimannA, et al.
The role of warning behaviors in threat assessment: an exploration and suggested typology. Behav Sci Law2012;
30:257–279.
5.
BjørgoTSilkosetE.Threats and threatening approaches to politicians: a survey of Norwegian parliamentarians and cabinet ministers.
Oslo:
Politihøgskolen, 2018.
6.
WilsonSDempseyCFarnhamF, et al.
Stalking risks to celebrities and public figures.BJPsych Adv2018;
24:152–160.
7.
JamesDVMullenPEMeloyJR, et al.
The role of mental disorder in attacks on European politicians 1990–2004.Acta Psychiatr Scand2007;
116:334–344.
8.
JamesDVMullenPEPathéMT, et al.
Attacks on the British Royal Family: the role of psychotic illness. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law2008;
36:59–67.
9.
Van der MeerBBBootsmaLMeloyR.Disturbing communications and problematic approaches to the Dutch Royal Family.J Forens Psychiatry Psychol2012;
23:571–589.
10.
EkeAWMeloyJRBrooksK, et al.
Threats, approach behavior, and violent recidivism among offenders who harass Canadian justice officials.J Threat Assess Manag2014;
1:188–202.
11.
DietzPEMatthewsDBMartellDA, et al.
Threatening and otherwise inappropriate letters to members of the United States Congress. J Forensic Sci1991;
36:1445–1468.
12.
DietzPEMatthewsDBVan DuyneC, et al.
Threatening and otherwise inappropriate letters to Hollywood celebrities. J Forensic Sci1991;
36:185–209.
13.
KraepelinE.Manic-depressive insanity and paranoia.
Chicago:
Chicago Medical Book Company, 1921.
14.
MunroA.Delusional disorder: paranoia and related illnesses.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1999.
15.
ManschreckTCKhanNL.Recent advances in the treatment of delusional disorder.Can J Psychiatry2006;
51:114–119.
16.
KraepelinE.Dementia praecox and paraphrenia.
Chicago:
Chicago Medical Book Company, 1919.
17.
LeonhardK.The classification of endogenous psychoses. 5th ed.
New York:
John Wiley, 1979.
18.
WilsonSFarnhamFHenleyS.Opt-in letters. The Psychiatrist2013;
37:340.
19.
ForresterAOwensDGCJohnstoneEC.Diagnostic stability in subjects with multiple admissions for psychotic illness.Psychol Med2001;
31:151–158.
20.
HM Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services. Policing and mental health: picking up the pieces.
London:
HMICFRS, 2018.
21.
AngioliniE.Report of the independent review of deaths and serious incidents in police custody.
London:
Home Office, 2017.
22.
WilsonSMurrayKHarrisM, et al.Psychiatric in-patients, violence, and the criminal justice system.Psychiatrist2012;
36:41–44.
23.
House of Commons Justice Committee. Transforming rehabilitation, ninth report of session 2017–2019. HC482.
London:
House of Commons, 2018.
24.
TaylorRYakeleyJ.Working with MAPPA: ethics and pragmaticsBJPsych Adv2019;
25:157–165.
MunetzMRGriffinPA.Use of the sequential intercept model as an approach to decriminalization of people with serious mental illness.Psychiatr Serv2006;
57:544–549.
27.
BionWR.Learning from experience.
London:
Karnac, 1991.
28.
SprongMSchothorstPVosE, et al.
Theory of mind in schizophrenia: meta-analysis.Br J Psychiatry2007;
191:5–13.
29.
MenziesIEP.A case-study in the functioning of social systems as a defence against anxiety: a report on a study of the nursing service of a general hospital.Br Psychoanal Soc1960;
13:95–121.
30.
GelsthorpeL.Criminal justice: the policy landscape. In: HucklesbyAWahidinA (eds) Criminal justice.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 2013.
31.
ColmanW.Symbolic conceptions: the idea of the third.J Anal Psychol2007;
52:565–583.
32.
FonagyPTargetM.Playing with reality: I. Theory of mind and the normal development of psychic reality. Int J of Psychoanal1996;
77:217–233.
