It is commonly reported that in the course of a drive, a parent or caretaker loses awareness of the presence of a child in the back seat of the car. Upon arriving at the destination, the driver exits the car and unknowingly leaves the child in the car. This incomprehensible lapse of memory exposes forgotten children to hazards, including death from heatstroke. More than 400 children in the past 20 years have suffered from heatstroke after being unknowingly forgotten in cars. How can loving and attentive parents, with no evidence of substance abuse or an organic brain disorder, have a catastrophic lapse of memory that places a child’s welfare in jeopardy? This article addresses this question at multiple levels of analysis. First, it is concluded that the loss of awareness of a child in a car is a failure of a type of memory referred to as prospective memory (PM), that is, failure to remember to execute a plan in the future. Second, factors that increase the likelihood that PM will fail are identified. Third, research on the neurobiology of PM and PM-related memory failures are reviewed, including a discussion of how competition between brain structures contributes to a failure of PM. Finally, the issue of whether a failure of PM that results in harm to a child qualifies as a criminal offence is discussed. Overall, this neuropsychological perspective on how catastrophic memory errors occur should be of value to the scientific community, the public and law-enforcement agencies.
CostaDGrundsteinA.
An analysis of children left unattended in parked motor vehicles in Brazil. Int J Environ Res Public Health2016;
13:649.
2.
FerraraPVenaFCaporaleOet al.
Children left unattended in parked vehicles: a focus on recent Italian cases and a review of literature. Ital J Pediatr2013;
39:91.
BoothJNDavisGGWaterborJet al.
Hyperthermia deaths among children in parked vehicles: an analysis of 231 fatalities in the United States, 1999–2007. Forensic Sci Med Pathol2010;
6:99–105.
6.
CrawfordJRSmithGMaylorEAet al.
The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. Memory2003;
11:261–275.
7.
JamesW. The principles of psychology.
New York:
Henry Holt and Company, 1890.
DewhurstSAHitchGJ.
Cognitive effort and recollective experience in recognition memory. Memory1999;
7:129–146.
10.
Goshen-GottsteinYMoscovitchMMeloB.
Intact implicit memory for newly formed verbal associations in amnesic patients following single study trials. Neuropsychology2000;
14:570–578.
11.
GasbarriAPompiliAPackardMGet al.
Habit learning and memory in mammals: behavioral and neural characteristics. Neurobiol Learn Mem2014;
114:198–208.
12.
BayleyPJFrascinoJCSquireLR.
Robust habit learning in the absence of awareness and independent of the medial temporal lobe. Nature2005;
436:550–553.
DismukesRK.
Prospective memory in workplace and everyday situations. Curr Dir Psychol Sc2012;
21:215–220.
15.
McDanielMLEinsteinGO. Prospective memory – An overview and synthesis of an emerging field.
Los Angeles, CA:
Sage, 2007.
16.
LismanJSternbergEJ.
Habit and nonhabit systems for unconscious and conscious behavior: implications for multitasking. J Cogn Neurosci2013;
25:273–283.
17.
WaldumERMcDanielMA.
Why are you late? Investigating the role of time management in time-based prospective memory. J Exp Psychol Gen2016;
145:1049–1061.
18.
HeringAWild-WallNGajewskiPDet al.
The role of cue detection for prospective memory development across the lifespan. Neuropsychologia2016;
93:289–300.
19.
BeckSMRugeHWalserMet al.
The functional neuroanatomy of spontaneous retrieval and strategic monitoring of delayed intentions. Neuropsychologia2014;
52:37–50.
20.
McDanielMAGuynnMJEinsteinGOet al.
Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn2004;
30:605–614.
21.
Gonen-YaacoviGBurgessPW.
Prospective memory: the future for future intentions. Psychol Belg2012;
52:173–204.
22.
KliegelMMartinM.
Prospective memory research: why is it relevant?Int J Psychol2003;
38:193–194.
23.
TerryWS.
Everyday forgetting – data from a diary study. Psychol Rep1988;
62:299–303.
24.
DismukesRK.
Understanding and analyzing human error in real-world operations. Human factors in aviation. 2nd ed.
Burlington, MA:
Elsevier, 2010, pp.335–374.
25.
GawandeAAStuddertDMOravEJet al.
Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. New Engl J Med2003;
348:229–235.
26.
FlynnEABarkerKNGibsonJTet al.
Impact of interruptions and distractions on dispensing errors in an ambulatory care pharmacy. Am J Health Syst Pharm1999;
56:1319–1325.
27.
ShorrockST.
Errors of memory in air traffic control. Safety Sci2005;
43:571–588.
HeathcoteALoftSRemingtonRW.
Slow down and remember to remember! A delay theory of prospective memory costs. Psychol Rev2015;
122:376–410.
31.
GrundgeigerTBayenUJHornSS.
Effects of sleep deprivation on prospective memory. Memory2014;
22:679–686.
32.
OhmanLNordinSBergdahlJet al.
Cognitive function in outpatients with perceived chronic stress. Scand J Work Environ Health2007;
33:223–232.
33.
EspositoMJOcchioneroMCicognaP.
Sleep deprivation and time-based prospective memory. Sleep2015;
38:1823–1826.
34.
YamanakaA.
Relations of mood states with types of typical cognitive failure in every life: a diary study. Psychol Rep2003;
92:153–160.
35.
IhleASchnitzspahnKRendellPGet al.
Age benefits in everyday prospective memory: the influence of personal task importance, use of reminders and everyday stress. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn2012;
19:84–101.
36.
KnightRGNichollsJTitovN.
The effects of old age and distraction on the assessment of prospective memory in a simulated naturalistic environment. Int Psychogeriatr2008;
20:124–134.
37.
LoftusEF.
Memory for intentions – effect of presence of a cue and interpolated activity. Psychonom Sc1971;
23:315–316.
38.
EinsteinGOMcDanielMAWillifordCLet al.
Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid. J Exp Psychol Appl2003;
9:147–162.
39.
LoftSRemingtonRW.
Prospective memory and task interference in a continuous monitoring dynamic display task. J Exp Psychol Appl2010;
16:145–157.
40.
DouskosC.
Habit and intention. Philosophia2017;
45:1129–1148.
41.
McBrideDMBecknerJKAbneyDH.
Effects of delay of prospective memory cues in an ongoing task on prospective memory task performance. Mem Cogn2011;
39:1222–31.
42.
SchacterDL.
Memory: sins and virtues. Ann N Y Acad Sci2013;
1303:56–60.
43.
ZhuBChenCSLoftusEet al.
The relationship between DRM and misinformation false memories. Mem Cogn2013;
41:832–838.
MorganCASouthwickSSteffianGet al.
Misinformation can influence memory for recently experienced, highly stressful events. Int J Law Psychiatry2013;
36:11–17.
46.
DeeseJ.
On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. J Exp Psychol1959;
58:17–22.
47.
RoedigerHLMcdermottKB.
Creating false memories – remembering words not presented in lists. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn1995;
21:803–814.
48.
Pardilla-DelgadoEPayneJD.
The Deese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM) task: a simple cognitive paradigm to investigate false memories in the laboratory. J Vis Exp2017;(119).
49.
PayneJDSchacterDLPropperREet al.
The role of sleep in false memory formation. Neurobiol Learn Mem2009;
92:327–334.
50.
ReasonJ.
Human error: models and management. BMJ2000;
320:768–770.
GlicksohnJMyslobodskyMS.
What it takes to remember the future. In: GlicksohnJMyslobodskyMS, eds. Timing the future: The case for a time-based prospective memory.
Singapore:
World Scientific Publishing, 2006, pp.263–306.
53.
EasterbrookJA.
The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychol Rev1959;
66:183–201.
54.
JanelleCMSingerRNWilliamsAM.
External distraction and attentional narrowing: visual search evidence. J Sport Exercise Psychol1999;
21:70–91.
55.
FawcettJMPeaceKAGreveA.
Looking down the barrel of a gun: what do we know about the weapon focus effect?J Appl Res Mem Cogn2016;
5:257–263.
56.
HopeLWrightDB.
Beyond unusual? Examining the role of attention in the weapon focus effect. Appl Cogn Psychol2007;
21:951–961.
57.
JonesAJohnstoneMJ.
Inattentional blindness and failures to rescue the deteriorating patient in critical care, emergency and perioperative settings: four case scenarios. Aust Crit Care2017;
30:219–223.
58.
PickelKL.
Unusualness and threat as possible causes of ‘weapon focus’. Memory1998;
6:277–295.
59.
SimonsDJ.
Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends Cogn Sci2000;
4:147–155.
60.
SimonsDJChabrisCF.
Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception1999;
28:1059–1074.
61.
GrundsteinADuzinskiSNullJ.
Impact of dangerous microclimate conditions within an enclosed vehicle on pediatric thermoregulation. Theor Appl Climatol2017;
127:103–110.
62.
McLarenCNullJQuinnJ.
Heat stress from enclosed vehicles: moderate ambient temperatures cause significant temperature rise in enclosed vehicles. Pediatrics2005;
116:E109–E112.
63.
McDanielMAUmanathSEinsteinGOet al.
Dual pathways to prospective remembering. Front Hum Neurosci2015;
9:392.
64.
ConaGScarpazzaCSartoriGet al.
Neural bases of prospective memory: a meta-analysis and the ‘Attention to Delayed Intention’ (AtoDI) model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev2015;
52:21–37.
65.
ConaGBisiacchiPSMoscovitchM.
The effects of focal and nonfocal cues on the neural correlates of prospective memory: insights from ERPs. Cereb Cortex2014;
24:2630–2646.
KesnerRPHopkinsRO.
Mnemonic functions of the hippocampus: a comparison between animals and humans. Biol Psychol2006;
73:3–18.
79.
SquireLR.
Declarative and nondeclarative memory – multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. J Cogn Neurosci1992;
4:232–243.
80.
PackardMG.
Role of basal ganglia in habit learning and memory: rats, monkeys, and humans. In: SteinerHTsengKY, eds. Handbook of basal ganglia structure and function.
Vol. 20.
London:
Academic Press, 2010, pp.561–569.
81.
YinHHKnowltonBJ.
The role of the basal ganglia in habit formation. Nat Rev Neurosci2006;
7:464–476.
82.
SteinvorthSCorkinSHalgrenE.
Ecphory of autobiographical memories: an fMRI study of recent and remote memory retrieval. Neuroimage2006;
30:285–298.
83.
PoldrackRAClarkJParé-BlagoevEJet al.
Interactive memory systems in the human brain. Nature2001;
414:546–550.
84.
PoldrackRAFoerdeK.
Category learning and the memory systems debate. Neurosci Biobehav Rev2008;
32:197–205.
85.
PoldrackRAPackardMG.
Competition among multiple memory systems: converging evidence from animal and human brain studies. Neuropsychologia2003;
41:245–251.
86.
SchwabeL.
Stress-induced shift from ‘cognitive’ towards ‘habit’ memory: role of the mineralocorticoid receptor. J Neural Transm2017;
124:1293–1294.
87.
SchwabeL.
Stress and the engagement of multiple memory systems: integration of animal and human studies. Hippocampus2013;
23:1035–1043.
88.
WhiteNMPackardMGMcDonaldRJ.
Dissociation of memory systems: the story unfolds. Behav Neurosci2013;
127:813–834.
89.
Arnsten AFT. Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2009; 10(6): 410–22.
90.
KimJJDiamondDM.
The stressed hippocampus, synaptic plasticity and lost memories. Nat Rev Neurosci2002;
3:453–462.
91.
GoodmanJLeongKCPackardMG.
Emotional modulation of multiple memory systems: implications for the neurobiology of post-traumatic stress disorder. Rev Neurosci2012;
23:627–643.
92.
HeideKMSolomonEP.
Biology, childhood trauma, and murder: rethinking justice. Int J Law Psychiatry2006;
29:220–233.
93.
HeideKMSolomonEP.
Female juvenile murderers: biological and psychological dynamics leading to homicide. Int J Law Psychiatry2009;
32:244–252.
94.
RaineABuchsbaumMLaCasseL.
Brain abnormalities in murderers indicated by positron emission tomography. Biol Psychiatry1997;
42:495–508.
95.
GieddJN.
Structural magnetic resonance imaging of the adolescent brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci2004;
1021:77–85.
96.
WarrickC.
Not in our right minds: the implications of reason and passion in the law. Polit Gender2011;
7:166–192.
97.
DennoDW.
Crime and consciousness: science and involuntary acts. Minn Law Rev2002;
87:269–399.
