It might be expected that follow-up telephone communication with next of kin relating to coronial autopsies would be distressing, particularly when made months or even years after the death. However, our experience has indicated that this is not the case in the majority of calls.
WulffBHeinemannAMeinsS. A retrospective evaluation of informed consent for tissue donation within a year of the donor’s death. Forensic Sci Int2013; 231: 240–243.
2.
HughesVKLangloisNEI. Visual and spectrophotometric observations related to histology in a small sample of bruises from cadavers. Forensic Sci Med Pathol2011; 7: 253–256.
3.
LangloisNHerbstJMasonK. Using the Excess Heat Factor (EHF) to predict the risk of heat related deaths. J Forensic Leg Med2013; 20: 408–411.
4.
McPheeSJBottlesKLoB. To redeem them from death. Reactions of family members to autopsy. Am J Med1986; 80: 665–671.
5.
BrownHG. Perceptions of the autopsy: Views From the lay public and program proposals. Hum Pathol1990; 21: 154–158.
6.
Forbe-SmithLHaireMDoneleyM. Social work practice in the donation of human tissue for transplantation. Soc Work Health Care2002; 35: 377–389.
7.
DraytonJEllisPSJPurcellT. Next of kin clinics. J Clin Pathol2000; 53: 646–646.
8.
BerryRSAureliusMBBarickmanN. Utility of a grief services program for medical examiners’ offices. J Forensic Sci2013; 58: 380–384.
