Experts from the field of behavioral sciences are regularly called upon in criminal prosecutions to offer an opinion as to an accused person's mental state at the time an alleged crime was committed. Within the confines of a criminal courtroom, perception often becomes reality. From a lawyer's perspective, the author attempts to reveal how the optics of a trial can become better aligned with actual fact through the adversarial process. Although written by a prosecutor, the upcoming commentary on the A,B,Cs of cross-examination should equally assist the defence counsel who must prepare his/her expert, the judge who must decide what weight to put on the testimony and the mental health expert who ultimately will be obliged to answer the questions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsK.M. (1984) Luria Left in the Lurch: Unfulfilled Promises are not Valid Tests. J. Clin. Neuropsychology6, 455–8.
2.
American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
BazelonD.L. (1975) A Jurist's View of Psychiatry. J. Psychiat. and Law3, 175–90.
BurghesP.H. (2000) Timing is Important in Selecting an Expert Witness. [On-line]. Available: http://www/expertpages.com.
6.
BursztajnH.J.ScherrA.E.BrodskyA. (1993) The Rebirth of Forensic Psychiatry in Light of Recent Historical Trends in Criminal Responsibility. [On-line]. Available: http://www.forensic-psych.com.
7.
ByrneK. (1991). Mental Health Professionals in Child Custody Disputes: Advocates or Impartial Examiners?Aust. Fam. Lawyer3, 8–12.
8.
Canadian Psychological Association (1991). Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists, (revised). Ottawa: Author.
9.
CouisellD.W.WilliamsH. (1997) Medical Malpractice.New York, Matthew Bender.
10.
DavisL.J. (1997, February) The Encyclopedia of Insanity. Harper's Magazine pp. 61–6.
11.
GudjonssonG.H. (1996) Results From the 1995 Survey: Psychological Evidence in Court. The Psychologist9, 213–37.
12.
HagenM.A. (1997) Whores of the Court.New York, Regan Books.
13.
HilgardE.R.AtkinsonR.L.AtkinsonR.C. (1979) Introduction to Psychology (7th ed.). Toronto, Harcourt Brace.
14.
KaufmanF. (1998) The Commission on Proceedings Involving Guy Paul Morin.Government of Ontario, Queen's Printer.
15.
LevittD.N.LeeC.S. (2000) Cross-Examining the Plaintiffs Psychiatric Expert. [On-line]. Available: http://www.psychinvestigator.com.
16.
LockeH.EvansJ.D. (1999) The Criminal Justice Review Committee.Government of Ontario, Queen's Printer.
17.
ManarinB. (1999a) Assessing the Expert: A Call for Reciprocal Disclosure in Canada. Med. Sci. Law39, 17–22.
18.
ManarinB. (1999b) Of Puppets and Puppeteers: The Role of the Expert Witness in a Criminal Prosecution in Canada. Med. and Law18 (1), 93–8.
19.
ManarinB. (1995) Witness for the Prosecution -Police Testimony. Royal Canadian Mounted Police Gazette57 (1), 8–12.
ShorterE. (1997) A History of Psychiatry.Toronto, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
30.
ShragerD.FrostE. (1986) The Quotable Lawyer.New York, New England Publishing Associates, Inc. (quoting Bazelon, D.L. (1973) as reported in an article in the May 13 issue of The Dallas Times Herald).
