Cranio-facial reconstruction has its origins in the 19th century, initially to recreate and ‘bring back to life’ the faces of the rich and the famous. Since then, over the last 100 years, there have been various methods used to produce reconstructions for forensic identification as well as for historical or archaeological purposes. These range from the traditional sculpting methods to those based on up-to-date computer technology. When no other method of identification is available in skeletalized, badly mutilated or decomposing remains, forensic craniofacial reconstruction may be employed to produce a face which it is hoped will trigger recognition and thus lead to a positive identification.
This paper discusses the role that cranio-facial reconstruction may play in identification and its limitations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AulsebrookW.A.IscanM.Y.SlabbertJ.H.BeckerP. (1995) Superimposition and reconstruction in forensic facial identification: a survey. Forensic Sci. Int.75, 101–20.
2.
AulsebrookW.A.BeckerP.IscanM.Y. (1996) Facial soft-tissue thickness in the adult male Zulu. Forensic Sci. Int.79, 83–102.
3.
BartlettJ.C.HurreyS.ThorleyW. (1984) Typicality and familiarity of faces. Memory and Cognition12, 219–28.
BruesA.M. (1958) Identification of skeletal remains. Journal of Criminal Law Criminal Pol. Sci.48, 551–63.
6.
CaldwellP.C. (1981) The Relationship of the details of the Human Face to the Skull and its Application in Forensic Anthropology. (M.A. Thesis.) Arizona, Tempe, Arizona State University, Department of Anthropology.
7.
CaldwellP.C. (1986) New questions (and some answers) on the facial reconstruction techniques. In: Reichs (ed) Forensic osteology.Springfield, Thomas, pp. 229–54.
8.
CherryD.G.AngelJ.L. (1977) Personality Reconstruction from Unidentified Remains. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin48, 12–15.
9.
DumontE.R. (1986) Mid-Facial Tissue Depth of White Children: An Aid in Facial Feature Reconstruction. J. Forensic Sci.31 (4), 1463–9.
10.
EllisH.D.DaviesG.M.ShepherdJ.W. (1978) A Critical Examination of the Photofit System for Recalling Faces. Ergonomics21 (4), 297–307.
FarrarF. (1977) From skull to visage: a forensic technique for facial reconstruction. Police Chief44, 78–80.
13.
FedosyutkinB.A.NainysJ.V. (1993) The Relationship of Skull Morphology to Facial Features. In: IscanHelmer (eds) Forensic Analysis of the Skull.New York, Wiley-Liss, pp. 199–213.
14.
GallowayA.BirkbyW.H.KahanaT.FulginitiL. (1990) Physical Anthropology and the Law: Legal Responsibilities of Forensic Anthropologists. Yrbk. Phys. Anthropol.33, 39–57.
15.
GatliffeB.P. (1984) Facial sculpture on the skull for identification. Am. J. Forensic Med. and Pathol.5, 327–32.
16.
GatliffeB.P.SnowC.C. (1979) From skull to visage. J. Biocommunication6 (2), 27–30.
17.
GeorgeR.M. (1987) The lateral craniographic method of facial reconstruction. J. For. Sci.32, 1305–30.
18.
GeorgeR.M. (1993) Anatomical and artistic guidelines for forensic facial reconstruction. In: IscanHelmer (eds) Forensic analysis of the skull.Wiley-Liss, New York, pp. 215–27.
19.
GerasimovM.M. (1971) The face Finder.London, Hutchinson.
20.
HaglundW.D.ReayD.T. (1991) Use of Facial Approximation Techniques in Identification of Green River Serial Murder Victims. The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology12 (2), 132–42.
21.
HarveyW. (1976a) Non-dental Identification. In: Harvey (ed) Dental Identification and Forensic Odontology.London, Kimpton, pp. 7–11.
22.
HarveyW. (1976b) Identification after Fire, Drowning, Air Crashes and Other Disasters. In: Harvey (ed) Dental Identification and Forensic Odontology.London, Kimpton, pp. 67–87.
23.
HelmerR.KoschorekF.TerweyB.FrauenT. (1986) Dickenmessung der Gesichtsweichteile mit Hilfe der Kernspintomographie zum Zwecke der Identifizierung. Arch. Krim.178, 139–50.
24.
HelmerR.P.RöhrichtS.PetersenD.MöhrF. (1993) Assessement of the Reliability of Facial Reconstruction. In: IscanHelmer (eds) Forensic Analysis of the Skull.New York, Wiley-Liss, pp. 229–46.
25.
HisW. (1895) Anatomische Forschungen ueber Johann Sebastian Bach's Gebeine und Antlitz'nebst Bemerkungen ueber dessen Bilder. Abhandlungen der Saechsischen Gesellschaft und Wissenschaften zu Leipzing22, 379–420.
26.
HodsonG.LiebermanL.S.WrightP. (1985) In vivo measurements of facial thicknesses in American Caucasoid children. J. Forensic Sci.30, 1100–12.
27.
HollienH. (1990) The expert witness: Ethics and responsibilities. J. Forensic Sci.35, 1414–23.
28.
KollmanJ. (1898) Die Weichteile des Gesichts und die Persistenz der Rassen. Anatomisch Anzeiger15, 165–77.
29.
KollmanJ.BüchlyW. (1898) Die Persistenz der Rassen und die Reconstruction der Physiognomie prähistorischer Schädel. Archiv für Anthropologie25, 329–59.
30.
KrogmanW.M. (1943) Role of the physical anthropologist in the identification of human skeletal remains. Part II. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin12 (5), 12–28.
31.
KrogmanW.M. (1946) The reconstruction of the living head from the skull. FBI Law Enforcement Bull.15 (7), 11–18.
32.
KrogmanW.M.IşcanM.Y. (1986) The human skeleton in forensic medicine. (2e). Springfield, Thomas.
33.
LebedinskayaG.V.BaluevaT.S.VeselovskayaE.V. (1993) Principles of Facial Reconstruction. In: IşcanHelmer (eds) Forensic analysis of the Skull.New York, Wiley-Liss, pp. 183–98.
34.
MachoG.A. (1986) An appraisal of the plastic reconstruction of the external nose. J. Forensic Sci.31 (4), 1391–403.
MontaguM.F.A. (1947) A study of man embracing error. Technical Review49, 345–7.
37.
NeaveR.A.H. (1980) Facial reconstruction of skeletal remains: Three Egyptian examples. MASCA J.1 (6), 175–7.
38.
NeaveR.A.H. (1989) Reconstruction of the skull and the soft tissues of the head and face of ‘Lindow Man’. Can. Soc. Forens. Sci. J.22 (1), 43–53.
39.
PerperJ.A.PattersonG.T.BacknerJ.S. (1988) Face Imaging Reconstructive Morphography. Am. J. Forensic. Med. Pathol.9 (2), 126–38.
40.
PhillipsV.M.SmutsN.A. (1996) Facial reconstruction: utilization of computerized tomography to measure facial tissue thickness in a mixed racial population. Forensic Sci. Int.83, 51–9.
41.
PragJ.NeaveR. (1997) Making Faces.London, British Museum Press.
42.
QuatrehommeG.CotinS.SubsolG.DelingetteH.GaridelY.GrévinG.FidrichM.BailetP.OllierA. (1997) A fully three-dimensional method for facial reconstruction based on deformable models. J. Forensic Sci.42 (4), 649–52.
43.
RathbunT.A. (1984) Personal identification: facial reproductions. In: RathbunBuikstra (eds) Human Identification: Case Studies in Forensic Anthropology.Springfield, Thomas, pp. 347–56.
44.
ReichsK.J.CraigE. (1998) Facial approximation: procedures and pitfalls. In: Reichs (ed) Forensic Osteology: Advances in the Identification of Human Remains. (2e). Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, pp. 491–513.
45.
RhineJ.S. (1984) Facial reproduction in court. In: RathbunBuikstra (eds) Human identification: Case studies in Forensic Anthropology.Springfield, Thomas, pp. 356–62.
46.
RhineJ.S. (1990) Coming to Terms with Facial Reproduction. J. Forensic Sci.35 (4), 960–3.
47.
RhineJ.S.CampbellH.R. (1980) Thickness of facial tissues in the American Negro. J. Forensic Sci.25, 847–58.
48.
RhineJ.S.MooreC.E. (1982) Facial reproduction tables of facial tissue thickness of American Caucasoid in forensic anthropology. Maxwell Museum Technical Series No. 1.New Mexico, Albuquerque.
49.
SassouniV. (1971) Orthodontics in dental practice.St Louis, CV Mosby.
50.
SnowC.C.GatliffeB.P.McWilliamsK.R. (1970) Reconstruction of facial features from the skull: An evaluation of its usefulness in forensic anthropology. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.33, 221–8.
51.
StewartT.D. (1979) Reconstruction of facial soft parts. In: StewartStewart (ed) Essentials of Forensic Anthropology.Springfield, Thomas, pp. 255–74.
52.
StewartT.D. (1983) The points of attachment of the palpebral ligaments: their use in facial reconstructions on the skull. J. Forensic Sci.28, 858–63.
53.
SukV. (1935) Fallacies of anthropological identifications and reconstructions: a critique based on anatomical dissections. Publications of the Faculty of Science, University of Masaryk22, 337–72.
54.
SuzukiT. (1973) Reconstruction of a skull. International Criminal Police Review28, 76–80.
55.
TaylorR.G.AngelC. (1998) Facial reconstruction and approximation. In: ClementRanson (eds) Craniofacial Identification in Forensic Medicine.London, Arnold, pp. 177–85.
56.
TyrellA.J.EvisonM.P.ChamberlainA.T.GreenM.A. (1997) Forensic three-dimensional facial reconstruction: Historical review and contemporary developments. J. Forensic Sci.42 (4), 653–61.
57.
UbelakerD.H. (1989) Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, Interpretation. Manuals of Archaeology. (2e). Washington DC, Smithsonian Institute.
58.
UbelakerD.H.O'DonnellG. (1992) Computer-assisted facial reproduction. J. Forensic Sci.37, 155–62.
59.
UbelakerD.H.BubniakE.O'DonnellG. (1992) Computer-Assisted Photographic Superimposition. J. Forensic Sci.37 (3), 750–62.
60.
ValentineT.BruceV. (1986) The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. Acta Psychologica61, 259–73.
61.
VanezisP.BlowesR.W.LinneyA.D.TanA.C.RichardsR.NeaveR. (1989) Application of 3-D computer graphics for facial reconstruction and comparison with sculpting techniques. Forensic Sci. Int.42, 69–84.
