Catholic Bioethics Perspectives on In Vitro Gametogenesis Technology

Abstract

In vitro gametogenesis (IVG) represents a paradigm shift in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) by offering the potential to derive human sperm and eggs from somatic cells such as skin fibroblasts. This introduces profound ethical, legal, and social challenges. This article explores Catholic bioethics perspectives on IVG, evaluating its proposed applications against foundational theological principles, including the sanctity of life, the nature of marriage, and the dignity of procreation. It examines the use of IVG for addressing primary and age-related infertility, facilitating transgender and intersex parenthood, and preventing the transmission of genetic diseases. Furthermore, it critically assesses more controversial applications, such as posthumous reproduction; mass production of donor gametes; same-sex, solo, and multiplex parenthood; and the genetic enhancement of offspring. Drawing upon Catholic moral frameworks, the analysis highlights the tension between the therapeutic desire to alleviate infertility and the ethical imperative to uphold the natural order of reproduction. The article concludes that while IVG may offer novel solutions for certain reproductive challenges, its broader applications risk commodifying human life, fracturing traditional family structures, and advancing eugenic ideologies, necessitating robust ethical reflection and regulatory oversight.

Keywords

assisted reproductive technology Catholic bioethics Christian in vitro gametogenesis IVF medical ethics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Catechism of the Catholic Church. 1997. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: United States Catholic Conference.

Aizawa

Peters

A. H. F. M.

Wutz

. 2025. “In Vitro Gametogenesis: Towards Competent Oocytes.” BioEssays 47 (1): e2400106. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202400106 .

Balistreri

2025. “Exploring Space: Ethical Dilemmas for Catholicism.” Frontiers in Space Technologies 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/frspt.2025.1539106 .

Bourne

Douglas

Savulescu

. 2012. “Procreative Beneficence and In Vitro Gametogenesis.” Monash Bioethics Review 30 (2): 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351338 .

Burbidge

M. F.

2025. “The Christian Family, In Vitro Fertilization, and Heroic Witness to True Love.” Catholic Diocese of Arlington. Accessed May 29, 2026. https://www.arlingtondiocese.org/2025/01/22/the-christian-family-in-vitro-fertilization-and-heroic-witness-to-true-love/.

Chia

2018. “In-Vitro Gametogenesis.” ETHOS Institute for Public Christianity, June 1. Accessed May 29, 2026. https://ethosinstitute.sg/in-vitro-gametogenesis/.

Chin

A. H. B.

Alon

Weerasekera

T. A.

Bosenge-Nguma

J. D.

Sun

. 2025a. “Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in Utilizing In Vitro Gametogenesis (IVG) and Stem Cell-Based Embryo Models (SCBEMs) for Human Reproduction in Singapore.” Health Care Analysis, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-025-00521-6 .

Chin

A. H. B.

Villalba

Alon

Sun

Yang

. 2025b. “Ethical Challenges in Extending Mitochondrial Replacement Therapy (MRT) for Overcoming Poor Egg Quality in Older Women Without Mitochondrial Diseases.” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 42 (12): 4131–4141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03713-0 .

Christian Medical & Dental Association (CMDA). 2025. “Position Statement on In Vitro Fertilization.” Accessed May 29, 2026. https://app.box.com/s/i0fm4d1d62lj709mav6v3wf2vsaxova5.

10.

Clark

2012. “A Balancing Act? The Rights of Donor-Conceived Children to Know Their Biological Origins.” Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 40 (3): 619–661. https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?httpsredir=1&article=1001&context=gjicl .

11.

Cohen

I. G.

Adashi

E. Y.

. 2025. “Ethical and Legal Implications of in Vitro Gametogenesis and Germline Editing—Current Status.” Fertility and Sterility 124 (1): 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.01.001 .

12.

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. 1987. Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation: Donum Vitae. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19870222_respect-for-human-life_en.html.

13.

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. 2008. Instruction Dignitas Personae on Certain Bioethical Questions. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20081208_dignitas-personae_en.html.

14.

Curlin

F. A.

Tollefsen

C. O.

. 2021. The Way of Medicine: Ethics and the Healing Profession. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

15.

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2018. “Posthumous Retrieval and Use of Gametes or Embryos: An Ethics Committee Opinion.” Fertility and Sterility 110 (1): 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.005 .

16.

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2026. “Ethical Considerations of In Vitro Gametogenesis: An Ethics Committee Opinion.” Fertility and Sterility 125 (4): 617–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2026.01.001 .

17.

Golombok

Readings

Blake

, et al. 2011. “Children Conceived by Gamete Donation: Psychological Adjustment and Mother-Child Relationships at Age 7.” Journal of Family Psychology 25 (2): 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022769 .

18.

Gordon

J. D.

2025. “Consider This Moment: The Moral Issues Raised by IVF – Let’s Be Honest with One Another.” Fertility and Sterility. https://www.fertstert.org/news-do/consider-moment-moral-issues-raised-ivf-let-s-honest-one-another .

19.

Greely

H. T.

2016. The End of Sex and the Future of Human Reproduction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

20.

Haas

J. M.

, 1998. “Begotten Not Made: A Catholic View of Reproductive Technology.” United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. https://www.usccb.org/committees/pro-life-activities/begotten-not-made-catholic-view-reproductive-technology.

21.

Hayashi

Ogushi

Kurimoto

Shimamoto

Ohta

Saitou

. 2012. “Offspring from Oocytes Derived from In Vitro Primordial Germ Cell-Like Cells in Mice.” Science 338 (6109): 971–975. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226889 .

22.

Hendriks

Dancet

E. A. F.

van Pelt

A. M. M.

Hamer

Repping

. 2015. “Artificial Gametes: A Systematic Review of Biological Progress Towards Clinical Application.” Human Reproduction Update 21 (3): 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv001 .

23.

Hikabe

Hamazaki

Nagamatsu

, et al. 2016. “Reconstitution In Vitro of the Entire Cycle of the Mouse Female Germ Line.” Nature 539 (7628): 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20104 .

24.

Ishii

Saitou

. 2017. “Promoting in Vitro Gametogenesis Research with a Social Understanding.” Trends in Molecular Medicine 23 (11): 985–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2017.09.001 .

25.

John Paul II. 1995. Evangelium Vitae. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031995_evangelium-vitae.html.

26.

Kass

L. R.

1972. “Making Babies—The New Biology and the ‘Old’ Morality.” Public Interest 26 (Winter): 18–56.

27.

Landecker

H. L.

Clark

A. T.

. 2026. “Considerations for the Future of In Vitro Gametogenesis in Fertility Care.” Nature Biotechnology 44 (4): 518–520. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-026-02604-x .

28.

Martí Gutierrez

Mikhalchenko

Shishimorova

, et al. 2025. “Induction of Experimental Cell Division to Generate Cells with Reduced Chromosome Ploidy.” Nature Communications 16 (1): 8340. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56234-x .

29.

McTavish

2022. “Why the Church Says ‘Yes’ to Life and No to IVF.” The Linacre Quarterly 89 (4): 450–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639221101838 .

30.

Meaney

2023. “Bioethics and Infertility Treatment.” National Catholic Bioethics Center. https://www.ncbcenter.org/messages-from-presidents/infertility. https://doi.org/10.35366/110245

31.

Murakami

Hamazaki

Hamada

, et al. 2023. “Generation of Functional Oocytes from Male Mice In Vitro.” Nature 615 (7954): 900–906. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05834-x .

32.

National Catholic Register. 2025. “Babies from Skin Cells: Catholics Decry Research Breakthrough over Human Egg Creation.” National Catholic Register, October 31. https://www.ncregister.com/news/babies-from-skin-cells-human-egg-creation-catholics-decry.

33.

Notini

Gyngell

Savulescu

. 2020. “Drawing the Line on In Vitro Gametogenesis.” Bioethics 34 (1): 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12606 .

34.

Pacholczyk

2024. “Poking the Hornet’s Nest of IVF.” National Catholic Bioethics Center. https://www.ncbcenter.org/making-sense-of-bioethics-cms/column-217-poking-the-hornets-nest-of-ivf.

35.

Pacholczyk

2025. “The Trump Executive Order on IVF.” National Catholic Bioethics Center. https://www.ncbcenter.org/making-sense-of-bioethics-cms/column-223the-trump-executive-order-on-ivf.

36.

Paglia

, ed. 2022. Etica Teologica Della Vita: Scrittura, Tradizione, Sfide Pratiche. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

37.

Palacios-González

Harris

Testa

. 2014. “Multiplex Parenting: IVG and the Generations to Come.” Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (11): 752–758. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2013-101810 .

38.

Paul VI. 1968. Humanae Vitae. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. https://www.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae.html.

39.

Pugeda

T. G. S.

2022. “A Catholic Moral Appraisal of In Vitro Gametogenesis.” The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 22 (1): 57–67. https://doi.org/10.5840/ncbq20222217 .

40.

Saitou

Miyauchi

. 2016. “Gametogenesis from Pluripotent Stem Cells.” Cell Stem Cell 18 (6): 721–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2016.05.001 .

41.

Sasaki

Yokobayashi

Nakamura

, et al. 2015. “Robust In Vitro Induction of Human Germ Cell Fate from Pluripotent Stem Cells.” Cell Stem Cell 17 (2): 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2015.06.014 .

42.

Savulescu

2007. “In Defence of Procreative Beneficence.” J Med Ethics 33 (5): 284–288. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.018184 .

43.

Second Vatican Council. 1965. Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World: Gaudium et Spes. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. Available at: https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_cons_19651207_gaudium-et-spes_en.html.

44.

Šeman

E. I.

Mathieson

E. M.

Villa

U. P.

, et al. 2024. “An Evaluation of Controversial Statements in Etica Teologica Della Vita.” The Linacre Quarterly 91 (4): 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639241245316 .

45.

Sgreccia

2022. Personalist Bioethics: Foundations and Applications. Translated by J.A. DiCamillo and M.J. Miller. Philadelphia, PA: National Catholic Bioethics Center.

46.

Southern Baptist Convention. 2024. “Resolution on the Ethical Realities of Reproductive Technologies and the Dignity of the Human Embryo.” Accessed May 29, 2026. https://www.sbc.net/resource-library/resolutions/on-the-ethical-realities-of-reproductive-technologies-and-the-dignity-of-the-human-embryo/.

47.

Suter

S. M.

2015. “In Vitro Gametogenesis: Just Another Way to Have a Baby?” Journal of Law and the Biosciences 3 (1): 87–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsv054 .

48.

Taylor

H. S.

Apelian

Adashi

E. Y.

. 2025. “In-Vitro Gametogenesis: Redefining Reproduction.” The Lancet Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Women’s Health 1 (2): e90–e91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S3050-5038(25)00052-4 .

49.

Turner

A. J.

Coyle

. 2000. “What Does It Mean to Be a Donor Offspring? The Identity Experiences of Adults Conceived by Donor Insemination and the Implications for Counselling and Therapy.” Human Reproduction 15 (9): 2041–2051. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.9.2041 .

50.

United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). 2025. “Parish Leader Kit: IVF & Other Assisted Reproductive Technologies.” Accessed May 29, 2026. https://www.usccb.org/resources/parish-leaders-kit-ivf-other-assisted-reproductive-technologies.

51.

World Health Organization. 2023. Infertility Prevalence Estimates, 1990–2021. Accessed May 29, 2026. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/a22ced65-46b1-4482-bf85-058719fec649/content.

52.

Yamashiro

Sasaki

Yabuta

, et al. 2018. “Generation of Human Oogonia from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells In Vitro.” Science 362 (6412): 356–360. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat1674 .

53.

Young

C. D.

Shaw

R. M.

Fehoko

E. S.

. 2026. “Exploring the Interface of Religion, Infertility and Assisted Reproduction Experiences of Pacific Christian Adults in Aotearoa New Zealand.” Culture, Health & Sexuality 28 (2): 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2025.2456789 .