Artificial Intelligence (AI) contributes to common goods and common harms in our everyday lives. In light of the Collingridge dilemma, information about both the actual and potential harm of AI is explored and myths about AI are dispelled. Catholic health care is then presented as being in a unique position to exert its influence to model the use of AI systems that minimizes the risk of harm and promotes human flourishing and the common good.
CouldryNickMejiasUlises A.2019a. “Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject.” Television & New Media20 (4): 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632.
7.
CouldryNickAli MejiasUlises. 2019b. The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Kindle. Culture and Economic Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
GenusAudleyStirlingAndy. 2018. “Collingridge and the Dilemma of Control: Towards Responsible and Accountable Innovation.” Research Policy47 (1): 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.012.
12.
GremmelsBecket. 2019. “Can Catholic Hospitals Still Be Catholic? A Virtue Theory Response.” Christian Bioethics25 (1): 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cby017.
13.
HimesKenneth R. 2008. “Globalization with a Human Face: Catholic Social Teaching and Globalization.” Theological Studies69 (2): 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/004056390806900202.
14.
KudinaOlyaVerbeekPeter-Paul. 2019. “Ethics from Within: Google Glass, the Collingridge Dilemma, and the Mediated Value of Privacy.” Science, Technology, & Human Values44 (2): 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918793711.
15.
MarceauPaul. 2003. “Lessons of Mission Discernment.” Health Progress84 (4): 40–42, 53.
16.
MartinSean. 2017. “Interpretation of Healing Narratives in the Bible.” In Incarnate Grace: Perspectives on the Ministry of Catholic Health Care, 57–81. USA: Catholic Health Association of the United States.
17.
MathenyMichaelIsraniS. ThadaneyAhmedMahnoorWhicherDanielle, eds. 2019. Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: The Hope, the Hype, the Promise, the Peril. NAM Special Publication, Prepublication Copy. The Learning Health System Series. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine. https://nam.edu/artificial-intelligence-special-publication/.
18.
MehrabiNinarehMorstatterFredSaxenaNripsutaLermanKristinaGalstyanAram. 2019. “A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning.” ArXiv:1908.09635 [Cs], September. http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.09635.
ObermeyerZiadPowersBrianVogeliChristineMullainathanSendhil. 2019. “Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm Used to Manage the Health of Populations.” Science366 (6464): 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342.
22.
OhmPaul. 2009. “Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1450006. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1450006.
23.
Pontifical Academy for Life. 2020. “Rome Call for AI Ethics.” www.romecall.org.
24.
Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. 2004. Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church. Publication (USCCB Publishing); No. 5-692. Cittá del Vaticano: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
TopolEric J. 2019. “High-Performance Medicine: The Convergence of Human and Artificial Intelligence.” Nature Medicine25 (1): 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7.
Van DijckJose. 2014. “Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology.” Surveillance & Society12 (2): 197–208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776.
34.
WallBarbra Mann. 2016. American Catholic Hospitals: A Century of Changing Markets and Missions. USA: Rutgers University Press.
35.
ZuboffShoshana. 2015. “Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization.” Journal of Information Technology30 (1): 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5.
