Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The Path of Fertile Family (FFP) is a service for couples experiencing infertility, aimed to obtain natural conception, as an alternative to assisted reproductive techniques, developed in 2018 and provided by the Counseling Centre of Centro della Famiglia Foundation, an institute of culture and pastoral care of the Diocese of Treviso, in cooperation with the local socio-health unit. FFP offers to infertile couples a specific multidisciplinary path of care, including the involvement of specific gynecological, andrological, endocrinological, and psycho-relational competences, together with fertility awareness. It represents an “experiential laboratory” for the multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment of infertility, for understanding relational processes, for the development of operational strategies and above all for the verification of the goodness of a lifestyle that is able to harmonize the couple’s project and the family’s project, couple satisfaction and parental openness. The setting of the service draws inspiration and reference from three paradigms from which significant ethical choices derive: the ecological perspective of fertility, the relational intimacy of the couple and a multidisciplinary approach. From the three founding paradigms, FFP model has been developed and progressively implemented in order to define a specific FFP Quality of Care Path (QCP) for couple infertility. Although further studies are needed to better clarify the role of each studied variable in a complex monitoring system, we identified for the first time a QCP Path based on 7 variables we present here two illustrative cases: the first one in which a natural conception has been obtained and the second one, in which the focus has been moved from natural conception to the reconstruction of relational competence. Further studies will demonstrate, on large scale, the efficacy of our protocol and of the analyzed variables.

Summary: This paper provides an overview of the conceptual and methodological process of implementing the monitoring of the path of infertile couples towards natural conception in harmony with their relational life project. A multi-professional team accompanies couples in overcoming the obstacles to fertility and in the progressive awareness that parenting is not only biological. The result is a range of goals to strive for. The reference paradigms of the service justify the ethical choices of the couple and the team. The operating protocol supports the couple commitment and guides professionals in their effective action if competent and concerted. The variables identified are the monitoring tool that gradually indicates the degree of the path progress.

Keywords

fertile family path infertile couple infertility natural conception fertility awareness relational competence multi-professional team monitoring dimensions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrao

M. S.

Muzii

Marana

2013. “Anatomical Causes of Female Infertility and Their Management.” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 123 (Suppl 2): S18-S24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.09.008.

Agresti

1990. Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.

Benazzi

2019. “A Multidisciplinary Approach to Health Care.” In Cusinato

Girotto

, (eds.). 2021. Management of human fertility and infertility. A multidisciplinary approach. Torino: C.G. Edizioni Medico Scientifiche Srl. ISBN 978-88-7110-493-5 IX-X. Taos: Op. cit.

Berardi

Sale

2018. Ambiente, plasticità e sviluppo cerebrale [Environment, plasticity and brain development]. Milano: Hachette.

Boivin

Bunting

Collins

J. A.

Nygren

K. G.

2007. “International Estimates of Infertility Prevalence and Treatment-Seeking: Potential Need and Demand For Infertility Medical Care.” Human Reproduction, 28 (6): 1506-1512. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem046.

Carson

S. A.

Kallen

A. N.

2021. “Diagnosis and Management of Infertility: A Review.” JAMA, 326: 65-76.

Cavasin

De Conto

2021. “The Paradigm of Integral Human Ecology in Fertility Management.” edited by Cusinato

Girotto

, 77-90. Taos: Op. cit.

Colesso

Cusinato

2018. “Alexithymia and The Relational Competence of Intimate Relationships in Regard to Gender and Age in A Nonclinical Population.” In Current developments in alexithymia. A cognitive and emotional deficit, edited by Texeira

R. J.

Bermond

Moormann

P. P.

, 73-106. New York: Nova Publishers.

Cusinato

2021. “Gaining awareness of the role of fertility as a resource for the marital style of relational intimacy.” edited by Cusinato

Girotto

, 91-106. Taos: Op. cit.

10.

Cusinato

Colesso

2007. “Creazione e validazione di un modello di atteggiamenti childfree [Creation and Validation of A Model of Child Free Attitudes].” Rivista di Studi Familiari, 1: 82-96. ISSN: 1972-5736.

11.

Cusinato

Colesso

Busato

Gava

2021. “Monitoring the Tuning of The «Fertile Family Path» Service For Overcoming Gaps Between Desire, Decision and Conception.” Interdepartmental Journal of Family Studies, 26 (1): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.14658/IJFS-26-1.

12.

Cusinato

Girotto

, eds. 2021. Management of human fertility and infertility. A multidisciplinary approach. Torino: C.G. Edizioni Medico Scientifiche Srl. ISBN 978-88-7110-493-5.

13.

D’Ippolito

Di Nicuolo

Pontecorvi

Gratta

Scambia

Di Simone

2018. “Endometrial Microbes and Microbiome: Recent Insights on The Inflammatory and Immune “Players” of The Human Endometrium.” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 80 (6): e13065. https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.13065.

14.

Dal Pozzo

2021. “The relationship makes the difference: reflections on a 40-year experience as a hospital gynecologist.” edited by Cusinato

Girotto

, 53-64. Taos: Op. cit.

15.

Deshpande

P. S.

Gupta

A. S.

2019. “Causes and Prevalence of Factors Causing Infertility in A Public Health Facility.” Journal of Human Reproduction Science, 12: 287-293.

16.

Doi

S. C.

Thelen

M. H.

1993. “The Fear-of-Intimacy Scale: Replication and Extension.” Psychological Assessment, 5 (3): 377-383. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.3.377.

17.

Donati

2015. L’enigma della relazione [The enigma of the relationship]. Milano: Mimesis.

18.

Forcolin

2021. “Sexuality and affectivity in the multidisciplinary approach to the couple fertility problems.” edited by Cusinato

Girotto

, 123-136. Taos: Op. cit.

19.

Grande

2021. “Diagnostic ow-chart and therapeutic perspectives for male factor infertility”. edited by Cusinato

Girotto

, 11-22. Taos: Op. cit.

20.

Grande

Milardi

Vincenzoni

Pompa

Biscione

Astorri

A. L.

Fruscella

De Luca

Messana

Castagnola

Marana

2015. “Proteomic Characterization of The Qualitative and Quantitative Differences in Cervical Mucus Composition During the Menstrual Cycle.” Molecular Biosystem, 11 (6): 1717-1725. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5mb00071h.

21.

Grande

Vincenzoni

Milardi

Pompa

Ricciardi

Fruscella

Mancini

Pontecorvi

Castagnola

Marana

2017. “Cervical Mucus Proteome in Endometriosis.” Clinical Proteomics, 14: 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-017-9142-4.

22.

L’Abate

2013. Beyond the systems paradigm emerging constructs in family and personality psychology. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7444-9.

23.

L’Abate

Cusinato

Maino

Colesso

Scilletta

2010. Relational competence theory: Research and mental health applications. New York: Springer. ISBN: 978-1-4419-5665-1.

24.

Masoumi

S. Z.

Parsa

Darvish

Mokhtari

Yavangi

Roshanaei

2015. “An Epidemiologic Survey on The Causes of Infertility in Patients Referred To Infertility Center in Fatemieh Hospital in Hamadan.” Iran Journal of Reproductive Medicin, 13: 513-516.

25.

Meuleman

Vandenabeele

Fieuws

Spiessens

Timmerman

D’Hooghe

2008. “High Prevalence of Endometriosis in Infertile Women with Normal Ovulation and Normospermic Partners.” Fertility and Sterility, 92 (1): 68-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.056.

26.

Milardi

2021. Male fertility and lifestyle. edited by Cusinato

Girotto

, 171-178. Taos: Op. cit.

27.

Morse

J. L.

Steger

2019. “Giving Birth to Meaning: Understanding Parenthood though the Psychology of Meaning in Life.” In Pathways and barriers to parenthood, edited by Ben-Ari

O. Taubman

, 1-17. Cham (Swiss): Springer Nature Switzerland.

28.

Moscatelli

2013. La valutazione della qualità relazionale. Come cambiano le organizzazioni che investono sulle relazioni [The assessment of relational quality. How organizations that invest in relationships change]. Milano: V&P.

29.

Obelenienė

Narbekovas

Juškevičius

2021. “Anthropological and Methodological Differences of Natural Family Planning and Fertility Awareness-Based Methods.” Linacre Quaterly, 88 (1): 14-23. Doi: 10.1177/0024363919886517.

30.

Oishi

Diener

Lucas

R. E.

2014. Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.

31.

Peterson

Place

J. M. S.

2019, “The Experience of Infertility: An Unexpected Barrier in the Transition to Parenthood.” In Pathways and barriers to parenthood, edited by Taubman Ben-Ari

, 19-37. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. http//doi.org/10.1007978-3-030-24864-2_2.

32.

Pope Francis

2021. Address at opening of the general states of birth. Friday, Accessed 14 May 2021. Auditorium Conciliazione, Rome. http://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/speeches/2021/may/documents/papa-francesco_20210514_statigenerali-natalita.html (18/05/2021).

33.

Ragusa

2016-2021. Linee guida/Raccomandazioni [Guidelines/Recommendations]. AOGOI. https://www.aogoi.it/fondazione-confalonieri-ragonese/linee-guida/

34.

Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group

2004. “Revised 2003 Consensus on Diagnostic Criteria and Long-Term Health Risks Related to Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.” Fertility and Sterility, 81: 19-25.

35.

Ryff

C. D.

Singer

B. H.

2008. “Know Thyself and Become What You Are: A Eudaimonic Approach to Psychological Well-Being.” Journal of Happiness Studies, 9: 13-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0.

36.

Rumbold

A.R.

Sevoyan

Oswald

T.K.

Fernandez

R.C.

Davies

M.J.

Moore

V.M.

2019. Impact of Male Factor Infertility on Offspring Health and Development. Fert Steril. 111 (6): 1047-1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.05.006.

37.

Sermeus

van den Heede

Lichielis

Delesi

Thonon

Van Boven

Codognotto

Gillet

2005. “Revising The Belgian Nursing Minimum Dataset: From Concept to Implementation.” International Journal of Medicine Informatics, 74 (11–12): 946-951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.005.

38.

Sesta

2021. “Human procreation between nature and technique. Cultural and ethical profiles.” edited by Cusinato

Girotto

, 65-76. Taos: Op. cit.

39.

Stanford

JB.

(2021). “Comparing restorative reproductive medicine and conventional reproductive medicine for infertility.” edited by Cusinato

Girotto

, 43-52. Taos: Op. cit.

40.

United Nations

2017. “Key Trends in Family Planning.” In Word family planning 2017. Highlights, 1. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/family/WFP2017_Highlights.pdf.

41.

Vigna

Zanardo

2005. La regola d’oro come etica universale [The golden rule as a universal ethics]. Milano: V&P.

42.

World Health Organization “WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Sixth edition. WHO, Geneve, Switzerland. ISBN: 9789240030787.

43.

Woody

J. D.

D’Souza

H. J.

Crain

D. D.

1994. “Sexual Functioning in Clinical Couples: Discriminant Validity of The Sexual Interaction System Scale.” American Journal of Family Therapy, 22(4): 291-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926189408251323.

44.

Wyrostkiewicz

2013.Human ecology. An outline of the concept and the relationship between man and nature. Lublin, Poland: Wydawnictwo KUL.

45.

Zamagni

Sacco

(2006). Teoria economica e relazioni interpersonali [Economic theory and interpersonal relationships]. Bologna: il Mulino.

46.

Zegers-Hochschild

Adamson

C. D.

Dyer

Racowsky

de Mouzon

Sokol

Rienzi

Sunde

Schmidt

Cooke

I. D.

Leigh Simpson

J. L.

van der Poel

2017. “The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care.” Fertility and Sterility, 108 (3): 393-406. https//doi.org/10.1016/i.fertnstert.2017.06.00510.1093/humrep/dex234.

A Multidisciplinary Quality of Care Path For Couple Infertility: Development of An Integrated Approach Founded on A Multidisciplinary,Personalistic,and Ecological Model For Couple Fertility

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References